Research on Renewable Resources Industrial Synergy Policy System in China

Abstract:

With the guidance of sustainable development strategy, countries around the world poured to carry out the conception of circular economy into the strategy of protecting ecological environment. As an important mode of circular economy, Renewable Resource Industry increasingly draw every parts of worlds attention. However, the Renewable Resource Industry is a typical Institutional Economy, which needs the role of government as well as the market mechanism. However, Renewable Resources Industry is in the primary stage of development, whose policy system is not thorough and guiding concept is not clear. In this background, guided by the full life cycle theory and collaborative theory, starting from the features and realistic demand of Renewable Resources Industry, the authors structure an industrial synergy policy framework for Renewable Resources Industry, which including design policy, manufacturing policy, consumption policy, recycle policy, demands policy and government policy. The research findings provide us with systematic ideas and methods to make the Renewable Resources Industry policy.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 933)
• Pages: 813-818
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.933.813
• Online since: May 2014
• Authors: Guang Fu Liu, Shi Bin Zhang*, Lei Zhang
• Keywords: Industrial Policy, Product Life Cycle Theory, Renewable Resources, Synergetics

References

[1] Hausmann R, D Rodrik. Doomed to choose: industrial policy as predicament [C]. School of Government, Harvard University. Mimeo, (2006).

[2] Cheng Liu, Qiang Gu, Ruiqing Dong. The Effect of Industrial Policy in Strategic Emerging Industry [J]. Comparative Economic & Social Systems, 2011(1): 196-203.

[3] Yanhau Lian. Pondering over the Policy System of technological innovation [J]. 1999, 20(4): 12-14.

[4] Chhibber, A., 1997: The state in changing world,. Finance and development. 34(3): 11-33.

[5] Amsden, Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrializaton, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989: 55.

[6] Wade R．, Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization, PrincetonUniversity Press, 1990: 231-266.

DOI: 10.1515/9780691187181

[7] Brander, J. A, Spencer, B.J.: Strategic Commitment with R&D: The Symmetric Case". The Bell Journal of Economics, 1983: Vol. 14, No. 1: 225-235.

DOI: 10.2307/3003549

[8] Brander, J. A, Spencer, B.J.: Export subsidies and international market share rivalry,. Journal of International Economics, 1985: Vol. 18 (1-2): 83-100.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-1996(85)90006-6

[9] DEAN J. Pricing policies for new products [J]. Harvard Business Review, 1950, 28(6): 45-53.

[10] LEVIRT T. Exploit the products life cycle [J]. Harvard Business Review, 1965, 43(6): 81-94.

[11] RINK D R, SWAN J E. Product life cycle research: a literature review [J]. Journal of Business Research, 1979, 7(3): 219-242.

DOI: 10.1016/0148-2963(79)90030-4

[12] CIMData Inc. Coiiaborative product definition management (cPDm): an overview[R]. Michigan: CIMData Inc. (2002).

[13] Miao Guo, Xiaoling Wu. Explore on the evaluation method of product life cycle in textile clothing [J]. CHINA TEXTILE LEADER, 2003(1): 70-73.

[14] CHEN Jianwei, WANG Jue. Research on Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Garment [J]. Journal of Qingdao University (E & T), 2006, 21(1): 71-76.

[15] WANG Laili, DING Xue, mei, WU Xiongying. The application of life cycle assessment in textile industry [J]. Journal of Xi'an Polytechnic University, 2009, 23(2): 617-620.

[16] Cheng Huiqiang. Ponder over the policy of Resource Recovery Industry in China [J]. Forum on Recycling Economy in China, 2006: 355-386.