Ergonomic Design and Evaluation of Laparoscopic Instrument Handle Based on Anthropometry

Article Preview

Abstract:

The laparoscopic instruments cause pain, numbness and damages to surgeons during the operation due to poor ergonomic design. Anthropometry is one of the most important factors in ergonomic design. Six hand dimensions have been measured in gripping position of fourteen subjects. A prototype handle was designed based on those anthropometric data and finally manufactured. In this study, surface EMG and angels of wrist during a simulated laparoscopic task were collected to evaluate the usability of the new designed and an available handle. After the task, a questionnaire was used to assess the comfort level of those handles subjectively. The compare of those physiological signals showed that the prototype was superior in ergonomic design. Regarding to the questionnaire, the prototype handle scored 58.08, and the current handle scored 52.22. The results showed that the prototype handle is more ergonomic designed than the current handle.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

109-113

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Minghua Zheng: Progress and Development Trend of Minimally Invasive Surgery [J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery, 22, (1). (2002).

Google Scholar

[2] Guoli Liu: Laparoscopic Surgery Minimally Invasive Significance [C]. Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery, (2). (2002).

Google Scholar

[3] R. Berguer, D.L. Forkey: Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery [J]. Surg Endosc, 13, 466–468. (1999).

DOI: 10.1007/pl00009635

Google Scholar

[4] Ramon Berguer M.D., Warren Smith, Ph.D.: An Ergonomic Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Technique: The Influence of Surgeon Experience and Task Complexity. Journal of Surgical Research. July, (134), 87-92. (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2005.10.003

Google Scholar

[5] Danielle M. Adams, Stephen J. Fenton, Bruce D. Schirmer: One size does not fit all: current disposable laparoscopic devices do not fit the needs of female laparoscopic surgeons [J]. Surg Endosc, 22, 2310-2313. (2008).

DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-9986-9

Google Scholar

[6] Allison DiMartino, Kathryn Doné, Timothy Judkins, Jonathan Morse, Jennifer Melander, Lincoln, M. Susan Hallbeck, Dmitry Oleynikov: Ergonomic Laparoscopic Tool Handle Design. The Human Factors And Ergonomics Society, (48), 1354-1358. (2004).

DOI: 10.1177/154193120404801218

Google Scholar

[7] D.K.H. Lam and W. Huang: Development of an Ergonomic Handle for Laparoscopic Surgery, WCB 2010, IMFBE Proceedings, (31), 99-102. (2010).

Google Scholar

[8] Wang Shu-yi, Qian Xing-shan: Study on Human factors Engineering Design in Mechnical Instrument[A]. Chinese Journal of Medical Device, (6). (2005).

Google Scholar

[9] M.A. van Veelen, M. Sc., D.W. Meijer, M.D., M. Sc., Ph.D., R.H.M. Goossens, M. Sc., Ph.D., and C.J. Snijder, M. Sc., Ph.D.: New Ergonomic Design Criteria for Handles of Laparoscopic Dissection Forceps. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, (11), 17-26. (2001).

DOI: 10.1089/10926420150502896

Google Scholar