Application of the Electrokinetic-Fenton Process for the Treatment of Lubricant-Contaminated Railroad Soil

Article Preview

Abstract:

Soil pollution around railroad sites is mainly caused by heavy oils such as diesel and lubricants. In particular, the majority of contamination in soil around railroad turnouts is caused by oil that drips off of railcars and lubricants that leak during vehicle maintenance. Generally, removing lubricants from contaminated soil is more difficult than removing diesel, due to the properties of the respective oils. This study aims to investigate alternative remediation method of lubricant-contaminated soils around railroad turnouts. The EK-Fenton process was used to clean up the lubricant-contaminated railroad soil. Several operating conditions were tested, including the concentration of hydrogen peroxide, and electrolyte types and concentrations. We determined that the removal efficiency was affected by the amount of EOF in the soil and its oxidizing capacity. The TPH removal efficiency was greatest at 0.1 M of NaCl electrolyte and 5 % (v/v) of hydrogen peroxide. This shows that the in-situ EK-Fenton process is a promising remediation technique for decontaminating railroad soil polluted with lubricant oil.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 955-959)

Pages:

2248-2253

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Park, S. -W., Lee, J. -Y., Yang, J. -S., Kim, K. -J. and Baek, K., Electrokinetic remediation of contaminated soil with waste-lubricant oils and zinc, J. Haz. Mat., Vol. 169 (2009), pp.1168-1172.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.04.039

Google Scholar

[2] Virkutyte, J., Sillanpaa M. and Latostenmaa P., Electrokinetic soil remediation-critical overview, Sci. Tot Envir., Vol. 289 (2002), pp.97-121.

DOI: 10.1016/s0048-9697(01)01027-0

Google Scholar

[3] Kim, S. -S., Kim, J. -H., and Han, S. -J., Application of the electrokinetic-Fenton process for the remediation of kaolinite contaminated with phenanthrene, J. Haz. Mat., Vol. B118 (2005), pp.121-131.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.10.005

Google Scholar

[4] Yang G.C. and Liu C-Y, Remediation of TCE contaminated soils by in situ EK-Fenton process, J. Haz. Mat., Vol. 85 (2001), pp.317-331.

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3894(01)00288-6

Google Scholar

[5] Park, J. -Y., Kim, S. -J., Lee, Y. -J., Baek, K. and Yang, J. -W., EK-Fenton process for removal of phenanthrene in a two-dimensional soil system, Eng. Geo., Vol. 77 (2005), pp.217-224.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.07.012

Google Scholar

[6] Oonnittan A., Shrestha R.A. and Sillanpaa M., Removal of hexachlorobenzene from soil by electrokinetically enhanced chemical oxidation, J. Haz. Mat., Vol. 162 (2009), pp.989-993.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.132

Google Scholar

[7] Alkan M., Demirbas O. and Dogan M., Electrokinetic properties of kaolinite in mono- and multivalent electrolyte solutions, Microporous and Mesoporous Mat., Vol. 83 (2005), pp.51-59.

DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.03.011

Google Scholar

[8] Tsai T. -T., Sah Jygau and Kao C. -M., Application of iron electrode corrosion enhanced electrokinetic-Fenton oxidation to remediate diesel contaminated soils: A laboratory feasibility study, J. Hydro., Vol. 380 (2010), pp.4-13.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.09.010

Google Scholar

[9] Peters S. M., Wong T. T. and Agar J. G., A laboratory study on the degradation of gasoline contamination using Fenton's reagent, Proceedings 54th Canadian Geotechnical Conference, Calgary (2001), pp.1170-1177.

Google Scholar

[10] Watts R.J. and Stanon P.C., Mineralization of sorbed and NAPL-Phase hexadecane by catalyzed hydrogen peroxide, Water Res., Vol. 33(6) (1999), pp.1405-1414.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(98)00343-1

Google Scholar

[11] Prosperini N. and Petugini D., Particle size distributions of some soils from the Umbria Region (Italy): Fractal analysis and numerical modeling, Geoderma, Vol. 145 (2008), pp.185-195.

DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.03.004

Google Scholar