Corrosion Resistance of CrSiN Coatings by Cathodic Arc Deposition with Different Arc Currents

Article Preview

Abstract:

Bipolar plate with multiple functions is one of the essential components of the PEMFC (Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells) stacks. Recently, metallic bipolar plates, particularly different grades of stainless steels, have been increasingly considered due to relatively low cost, good corrosion resistance, sufficient stiffness and excellent flexibility in thin forms, and easy manufacturability [1-3]. However, the major concerns with the use of stainless steel alloys as bipolar plates are their corrosion resistance and interfacial electrical resistance under long operation conditions. Development of advanced ternary nitride coatings such as chromium silicon nitride (CrSiN) has attracted significant industrial interest in recent years [4-11]. Si addition of CrN to form CrSiN films were prepared by cathode arc ion deposition technique and magnetron sputter technique, in order to improve the characterizations of the coatings from structure to corrosion behaviors. It is reported that with the additional element of Si, the hardness and corrosion resistance of the CrSiN coatings can be greatly improved compared to that of the CrN coating. A direct link between the microstructure and mechanical properties of CrSiN coatings with varying Si contents was established [8]. With increasing Si content, the structure of CrSiN coating exhibited the transformation from a columnar-grained structure to a nanocomposite structure, consisting of CrN nanocrystallites embedded in an amorphous matrix. A maximum hardness of 26.6 GPa was found for CrSiN coating with Si content of about 6.7 at.%, while that of pure CrN was 19.4 GPa [6]. Up to now, the CrSiN is yet thoroughly investigated.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 960-961)

Pages:

152-156

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D.P. Davies, P.L. Adcock, M. Turpin, S.J. Rowen, J Power Sources 86 (2000) 237.

Google Scholar

[2] Dongming Zhang, Liangtao Duan, Lu Guo, Zaiyi Wang, Jun Zhao, Wei-Hsing Tuan, Koichi Niihar, Int. J Hydrogen Energy, 36 (2011) 9155.

Google Scholar

[3] Cabir Turan, Ömer Necati Cora, Muammer Koc, Int. J Hydrogen Energy, 36 (2011) 12370.

Google Scholar

[4] Y.H. Yoo, J.H. Hong, J.G. Kim, H.Y. Lee, J.G. Han, Surf. Coat. Technol. 201 (2007) 9518.

Google Scholar

[5] Sang-Yul Lee, Yeh-Sun Hong, Surf. Coat. Technol. 202 (2007) 1129.

Google Scholar

[6] E. Bousser, M. Benkahoul, L. Martinu, J.E. Klemberg-Sapieha, Surf. Coat. Technol. 203 (2008) 776.

Google Scholar

[7] M. Azzi, M. Benkahoul, J.A. Szpunar, J.E. Klemberg-Sapieha, L. Martinu, Wear 267 (2009) 882.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2009.01.027

Google Scholar

[8] P.C. Wo, P.R. Munroe, Z. Li, Z. -T. Jiang, Z.H. Xie, Z.F. Zhou, K.Y. Li, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 534 (2012) 297.

Google Scholar

[9] Hetal N. Shah, R. Jayaganthan, Avinash C. Pandey, Materi. Design 32 (2011) 2628.

Google Scholar

[10] Jianliang Lin, Bo Wang, Yixiang Ou, William D. Sproul, Isaac Dahan, John J. Moore, Surf. Coat. Technol. 216 (2013) 251.

Google Scholar

[11] Shaojian Yan, Tongcheng Fu, Ruyi Wang, Canxin Tian, Zesong Wang, Zhihong Huang, Bing Yang, Dejun Fu, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 307 (2013) 143.

Google Scholar

[12] Min-Hang Weng, Cheng-Tang Pan, Ru-Yuan Yang, Chun-Chih Huang, Ceramics International 37 (2011) 3077.

Google Scholar

[13] Antunes R, Oliveira M, Ett G, Ett V., Int J Hydrogen Energy 35 (2010)3632.

Google Scholar