Interpretive Structural Model of the Evolution of Urban Economic Space

Abstract:

An urban economic space system consists of an interactional economic system and its carrier. Characterized by numerous elements, complex relations, and structural levels, this system is also composed of the following: industrialization, urbanization and its cooperative system, environmental restrictions, and other subsystems. Structural principle and interpretive structural modeling are employed to build an interpretive structural model of 36 elements distributed across 12 levels. The following relation, i.e., industrialization → urbanization → environmental restrictions, constitutes a core substructure that affects the cooperative degree of urbanization and industrialization.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 962-965)
• Pages: 2479-2484
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.962-965.2479
• Online since: June 2014
• Authors: Qi Wang, Yuan Yuan Jiao, Xiao Li Guo*
• Keywords: Cooperative Degree, Industrialization, Interpretive Structure Mode, Urban Economic Space, Urbanization

References

[1] Li Shenghui, Economic Agglomeration and Regional Economic Growth, Theoretical Discussion and Empirical Study, Thesis for doctorate degree, Ji'nan University (2008), p.5.

[2] X.H. Yuan, Xi Ji, H. Chen, B. Chen and G.Q. Chen, Urban dynamics and multiple-objective programming, A case study of Beijing, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation (2008), p.1998–(2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2007.03.014

[3] Stephen Blanchette Jr, A hydrogen, economy and its impact on the world as we know it, Energy Policy (2008), p.522–530.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.029

[4] Hou Xueying, Grey relational analysis between urbanization level and urban temperature change in China, Ecological Economy (2009), p.57–60.

[5] Zheng Chen and Liu Chunbin, Cost analysis and opportunity selection for green transformation of cities with resource-based economies, Ecological Economy (2009), p.31–34.

[6] Wang Rushong, Hu Dan and Li Feng, Complex ecological management of regional urban development , Beijing, Meteorology Publishing House (2010).

[7] Moriah J. Bellenger and Alan T. Herlihy, An economic approach to environmental indices, Ecological Economics (2009), p.2216–2223.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.04.004

[8] Li Dongxu, Urban comprehensive carrying capacity theory and empirical study, Wuhan University of Technology (2008), p.39–40.

[9] Zhang Yan and Xu Jianhua, An Analysis on Space Relationship Between Regional Development Potential and Resource Environment Carrying Capacity of China, Resource Science (2009) p.1328–1334.

[10] Sarah Prout and Richard Howitt, Frontier imaginings and subversive indigenous spatialities, Journal of Rural Studies (2009), P. 396–403.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.05.006

[11] L.X. Zhang, B. Chen, Z.F. Yang, G.Q. Chen, M.M. Jiang and G.Y. Liu, Comparison of typical mega cities in China using energy synthesis, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation (2009), P. 2827–2836.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2008.03.018

[12] Masahisa Fujita, Paul Krugman and Antony J. Venables, The Spatial Economy—Cities, Regions and International Trade, Beijing: China Renmin University (2007), in press.

DOI: 10.12681/rp.18541

[13] Guo Junhua, Cai Wen and Yang Changyu, Study on Countermeasures of city of industrialization-Guanzhong area in Shaanxi as an example, Cultural Geography (2009), p.59–62.

[14] Z.F. Cai, L.X. Zhang, B. Zhang and Z.M. Chen, Energy based analysis of Beijing–Tianjin–Tangshan region in China, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation (2009), p.4319–4331.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.03.009

[15] Wang Qi and Chen Chai, An Analysis on Coupling Degree of Industry Cluster and Regional Economy Space, Geographical Science (2008), p.145–149.