Mechanics Design of Connecting Frame in Aircraft Composite Cabin

Article Preview

Abstract:

The mechanics behaviour of connecting frame in aircraft composite cabin under static load can be expatiated through its dangerous key components. Initial damage and ultimate strength of the key component are studied using progressive damage method. Based on the strength prediction technique, the effects of composites ply angle and the structural layout on structural initial damage and ultimate failure are discussed to exploit the potential composite structural load carry ability. The numerical results show the ply angle modification can provide 26.3% increase on initial failure stress and 14.1% on ultimate strength. Farther structural layout adjustment can significantly increase the ultimate strength whereas go against the initial failure strength. The design scheme with concave boxes to cope with assembly demands is verified to be practical in joint structures by comparing with a connecting frame without concave boxes.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 97-101)

Pages:

3362-3365

Citation:

Online since:

March 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B. Butler: 41th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference and Exhibit, USA (2000).

DOI: 10.2514/msdm98

Google Scholar

[2] L.B. Zhao, F.R. Liu, J.Y. Zhang: Advanced Materials Research, Vols. 79-82(2009), p.1959-(1962).

Google Scholar

[3] G.S. Padhi, R.A. Shenoi, S.S.J. Moy, G.L. Hawkins: Composite structures, Vol. 40(1998), pp.277-291.

Google Scholar

[4] P.P. Camanho , F.L. Matthews: Journal of composite materials, Vol. 33 (1999), pp.2248-2280.

Google Scholar

[5] S. Feih, H.R. Shercliff: Composites part A, Vol. 36(2005), pp.381-395.

Google Scholar

[6] K.I. Tserpes, G. Labeas, P. Papanikos, T.H. Kermanidis: Composites part B, Vol. 33(2002), pp.521-529.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-8368(02)00033-1

Google Scholar