Status Analysis of Quality Prediction for Automotive Injection Molded Parts

Article Preview

Abstract:

Injection molding is a very complex multi-factor coupling effect and a nonlinear dynamic process. Therefore, under the influence of nonlinear and multi-factor, injection molding goal is to effectively predict and guarantee the quality of injection molded parts. In this paper, the common methods used to predict the quality of injection molded parts are introduced, including: Taguchi method, artificial neural network, response surface method, radial basis function method and Kriging model method. Research progresses as well as application examples of forecasting methods at home and abroad is summarized. Besides, the development trend of the injection molding quality prediction is discussed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 998-999)

Pages:

534-537

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] C.T. Liu and C.Y. Sheng: Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, Vol. 21 (2004) No. 5, p.68.

Google Scholar

[2] K.M. Tsai, C.Y. Hsieh and W.C. Lo: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 209(2009) No. 7, p.3469.

Google Scholar

[3] H. Oktem, T. Erzurumlu and I. Uzman: Materials & Design, Vol. 28 (2007) No. 4, p.1271.

Google Scholar

[4] G.C. Xing and T.W. Qiang: Technology Wind, Vol. 15 (2012), p.65.

Google Scholar

[5] S. Kenig, A. Ben-David, M. Omer and A. Sadeh: Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 14 (2001) No. 6, p.819.

DOI: 10.1016/s0952-1976(02)00006-4

Google Scholar

[6] M. Altan: Materials & Design, Vol. 31 (2010) No. 1, p.599.

Google Scholar

[7] X.F. Sheng, F. Huang and Z. Luo: Plastic, Vol. 39 (2010) No. 6, p.11.

Google Scholar

[8] W.C. Chen, P.H. Tai, M.W. Wang and W. J. Den: Expert systems with Applications, Vol. 35 (2008) No. 3, p.843.

Google Scholar

[9] R.H. Myers and C.M. Anderson-Cook: Response surface methodology (John Wiley & Sons, America 2009).

Google Scholar

[10] D. Mathivanan and N.S. Parthasarathy: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 43 (2009) No. 7-8, p.654.

Google Scholar

[11] C.C. Chen, P.L. Su and Y.C. Lin: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 45 (2009) No. 11-12, p.1087.

Google Scholar

[12] H. Kurtaran and T. Erzurumlu: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 27 (2010) No. 5-6, p.468.

Google Scholar

[13] B. Ozcelik and T. Erzurumlu: International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 32 (2005) No. 8, p.1085.

Google Scholar

[14] X.F. Mu, W.X. Yao, X.Q. Yu and K.L. Liu: Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, Vol. 22 (2005) No. 5, p.608.

Google Scholar

[15] C. Li, F.L. Wang, Y.Q. Chang and Y. Liu: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 48 (2010) No. 5-8, p.505.

Google Scholar

[16] S. Su, X.Z. Duan, W.L. Chan and Z.H. Li: International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Vol. 31 (2009) No. 7, p.351.

Google Scholar

[17] J.R. Shie: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 36 (2009) No. 11-12, p.1091.

Google Scholar

[18] Y.C. Dang, H.B. Liu and X.Y. Zhai: Plastic, Vol. 42 (2013) No. 003, p.79.

Google Scholar

[19] X.P. Dang: Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, Vol. 41 (2014), p.15.

Google Scholar

[20] Y. Gao and X. Wang: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 209 (2009) No. 3, p.1302.

Google Scholar

[21] E. Li, L. Jia and J. Yu: Computers & Chemical Engineering, Vol. 26 (2002) No. 9, p.1253.

Google Scholar

[22] J. Lin and R. J. Lian: Mechatronics, Vol. 20 (2010) No. 6, p.698.

Google Scholar