Utilizing Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Evaluate Data Sharing Facility of Spatial Data Infrastructures (SDIs) at the Local Government Level in Indonesia

Abstract:

Indonesia was part of the first Spatial Data Infrastructures (SDIs) adopter since 1993 [8]. The motivation of SDIs development is to connect thematics spatial data among governments agencies in Local and Central Governments. Data sharing able to reduce data redundancy and allows spatial data to be used multiple times for various purposes [21, 12]. Since the issuance of Presidential Regulation No. 27 of 2014 concerning the National Geospatial Information Network, Central and Local Government develop their geoportal or web gis. This research aims to evaluate the web gis or geoportal at local level based on Perceived Ease of Use (PEU), Perceived Usefulness (PU), Attitude Toward Using (ATU), and Actual Usage (AU). The data source of this research is correspondent’s questionnaire answer. The questionnaire filled up by Development Planning Agency at Sub-National Level (Bappeda) in Indonesia. To obtain research results, the step of study is developing questionnaire, sending questionnaire, questionnaire recapitulation, hypothesis formulation, Strucured Equation Model (SEM) modeling, and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) calculations. the questions in the questionnaire must refer to the four basic SEM models so that there is no blank value in any of the models. The benefits of this research can predict the adoption of SDIs at the local level and evaluate user respond about ease, convenience, and consistency in using geoportals at districts/cities level for sharing data. As a result of this research, TAM can evaluate the acceptance of geoportal at Local Government. In this research, TAM was able to assess the hypotheses used in this study. Among the 5 hypotheses, 3 hypotheses were accepted because they had a t-value greater than 0.05. Based on the hypothesis test results, it can be obtained that local governments can receive the convenience and benefits of geoportals or web GIS as a service for sharing spatial data.

• Periodical: Advances in Science and Technology (Volume 112)
• Pages: 137-144
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-4y9477
• Online since: April 2022
• Authors: Annisa Farida Hayuningsih*, Heri Sutanta
• Keywords: Geoportal, Indonesia SDIs, Local SDIs, Spatial Data Infrastructure, Technology Acceptance Model

References

[1] I. Masser, All Shapes and Sizes: The First Generation of National Spatial Data Infrastructure. Paper presented at the Selected Conference Papers of the Third Global Spatial Data Infrastructure Conference, Canberra, (1998).

DOI: 10.1201/9780429505904-11

[2] R.W. Matindas, Puntodewo, & B. Purnawan, Development of National Spatial Data Infrastructure in Indonesia. FIG Working Week, Athens, Greece, (2004).

[3] J. Ogunbiyi, Reviewing the status of National Spatial Data Infrastructure: A case study in Southern African Countries [Diploma Thesis, Technische Universität Wien], 2021, https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2021.89045.

[4] Y. Guigoz, G. Giuliani, A. Nonguierma, A. Lehmann, A. Mlisa, N. Ray, Spatial Data Infrastructures in Africa: A Gap Analysis. Journal of Environmental Informatics, September 2017, Vol. 30 Issue 1, pp.53-62. 10p.

[5] A. Farida, Evaluasi Kesiapan Infrastruktur Data Spasial Di Pemerintah Kabupaten/Kota Menggunakan Kuesioner Evaluasi Diri Dan Technology Acceptance Model, Thesis of Master Program, Geomatics Engineering Master Study Program, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta, (2014).

DOI: 10.29408/geodika.v6i1.4480

[6] M.R. Gamez, A.V. Perez, V.A.M. Falcones, J.J.B Bazurto, The Geoportal as Strategy for Sustainable Development International Journal of Physical Sciences and Engineering. Vol. 3 No. 1, April 2019, pages: 10~21 e-ISSN : 2550-6943, p-ISSN : 2550-6951.

DOI: 10.29332/ijpse.v3n1.239

[7] Geospatial Information Agency of the Republic of Indonesia, Kinerja Simpul Jaringan Indonesia 2018, Bogor, Indonesia, 1st print – October (2019).

[8] Information on https://jdih.big.go.id/media/resources/law/keputusan-deputi-bidang-infrastruktur-informasi-geospasial-badan-informasi-geospasial-nomor-11-tahun-2019-tentang-rencana-strategis-deputi-bidang-infrastruktur-informasi-geospasial-badan-informasi-geospasial-tahun-2016-2019/.

DOI: 10.21063/spi3.1017.228-242

[9] J. Smith, L. Ting, & I. Williamson, Developing a common spatial data infrastructure between state and local government: An Australian case study. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 16(4), 305-322, (2002).

DOI: 10.1080/13658810110096001

[10] M. Barbero, et. al., The Role of Spatial Data Infrastructures in the Digital Government Transformation of Public Administration, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019, ISBN 978-92-76-09679-5.

[11] TYD. Putra, Y. Sekimoto, R. Shibasaki, Toward the Evolution of National Spatial Data Infrastructure Development in Indonesia, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2019 ( 8, 263),.

DOI: 10.3390/ijgi8060263

[12] G.S. Hubona & P.H. Cheney, System effectiveness of knowledge-based technology: the relationship of user performance and attitudinal measures. Paper presented at the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference, Wailea, HI, USA, (1994).

DOI: 10.1109/hicss.1994.323465

[13] I. Yuadi, Analisis Technology Acceptance Model terhadap Perpustakaan Digital dengan Structural Equation Modeling. Departemen Ilmu Informasi dan Perpustakaan, (2009).

DOI: 10.29240/tik.v6i2.4438

[14] P. A. M. W. Wida, et. al., Aplikasi Model TAM (Technology Acceptance Model) pada Perilaku Pengguna Instagram." Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Mahasaraswati, 2016, vol. 6, no. 2.

[15] S. Naspetti, S. Mandolesi, J. Buysse, T. Latvala, P. Nicholas, S. Padel, E.J. Van Loo, R. Zanoli, Determinants of the Acceptance of Sustainable Production Strategies among Dairy Farmers: Development and Testing of a Modified Technology Acceptance Model. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1805. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101805.

DOI: 10.3390/su9101805

[16] A. Granić, N. Maragunić, Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review, British Journal of Education Technology, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/ bjet.12864.

[17] F.D. Davis, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, 1993, Vol.13, No.3, pp.319-340.

DOI: 10.2307/249008

[18] S. Y. Wang, Y.M. Wang., H. Lin., dan T.I. Tang. Determinants of User Acceptance of Internet Banking: An Empirical Study, International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp.501-519, (2003).

DOI: 10.1108/09564230310500192

[19] A. Wibowo, Kajian Tentang Perilaku Pengguna Sistem Informasi Dengan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Jakarta Selatan : Program Studi Sistem Informasi, Fakultas Teknologi Informasi Universitas Budi Luhur, (2006).

DOI: 10.29408/edumatic.v4i1.2130