A Proposed User Interface Design as a Stimulus for Personality Types Confirmation

Abstract:

Determining the stimulus is the first step in experimental research to classify personality types based on electroencephalography (EEG), which is stimulated by a visual form known as visual evoked potential (VEP). Matching the personality type of workers to work activities is an organizational concern. The organization demands the concentration of workers to achieve work standards. Information system user interface is a visual form commonly seen by individuals working to carry out job descriptions. Interviews and observations were carried out on several workers as participants. The user interface design of the information systems used by them is the focus of this exploration stage. All participants involved are at the operational level. Their work activities are closely related to the processing of corporate data transactions. Activities of viewing, searching, entering, editing, and deleting data are their daily activities. Of these various activities, all agreed that the data entry process was an activity that required the highest concentration because the validity of the data was essential. Several data entry form designs come in a variety of forms. They were observed to see similarities to one another. The proposed stimulus is the general form of the overall observed data entry form design.

• Periodical: Advances in Science and Technology (Volume 112)
• Pages: 145-152
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-l7si7j
• Online since: April 2022
• Authors: Ilham Perdana*, Paulus Insap Santosa, Noor Akhmad Setiawan, Supra Wimbarti
• Keywords: Electroencephalography, Personality Type, Stimulus, User Interface Design, Visual Evoked Potential

References

[1] T. N. Q. Tram, C. G. T. Tai, and D. T. B. Thuy, User interface design pattern Management System Support for Building Information System,, 2006 1st Int. Conf. Digit. Inf. Manag., p.96–101, 2007,.

DOI: 10.1109/icdim.2007.369336

[2] M. D. Lytras, F. Garcia-Peñalvo, and P. Ordóñez De Pablos, Advanced human-computer interaction,, Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 29, no. 2, p.305–306, (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.018

[3] R. Miñón, L. Moreno, P. Martínez, and J. Abascal, An approach to the integration of accessibility requirements into a user interface development method,, Sci. Comput. Program., vol. 86, p.58–73, 2014,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scico.2013.04.005

[4] Å. Granlund, D. Lafrenière, and D. A. Carr, A Pattern-Supported Approach to the User Interface Design Process,, Proc. HCI Int. 2001 9th Int. Conf. Human-Computer Interact., vol. 9, p.1–5, 2001, [Online]. Available: http://www.sm.luth.se/csee/csn/publications/ HCIInt2001Final.pdf.

[5] J. O. Borchers, A pattern approach to interaction design,, AI Soc., vol. 15, no. 4, p.359–376, 2001,.

[6] N. Capuano, G. D'Aniello, A. Gaeta, and S. Miranda, A personality based adaptive approach for information systems,, Comput. Human Behav., vol. 44, p.156–165, 2015,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.058

[7] R. Yan, Icon design study in computer interface,, in Procedia Engineering, 2011, vol. 15, p.3134–3138,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.08.588

[8] N. Hollender, C. Hofmann, M. Deneke, and B. Schmitz, Integrating cognitive load theory and concepts of human-computer interaction,, Comput. Human Behav., vol. 26, no. 6, p.1278–1288, 2010,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.031

[9] A. González-Torres, F. J. García-Peñalvo, and R. Therón, Human–computer interaction in evolutionary visual software analytics,, Comput. Human Behav., vol. 29, no. 2, p.486–495, Mar. 2013,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.013

[10] O. A. Alsos, A. Das, and D. Svanæs, Mobile health IT: The effect of user interface and form factor on doctor-patient communication,, Int. J. Med. Inform., vol. 81, no. 1, p.12–28, 2012,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.09.004

[11] J. Kim, A. Lee, and H. Ryu, Personality and its effects on learning performance: Design guidelines for an adaptive e-learning system based on a user model,, Int. J. Ind. Ergon., vol. 43, no. 5, p.450–461, 2013,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2013.03.001

[12] S. V Pantazi, A. Kushniruk, and J. R. Moehr, The usability axiom of medical information systems,, Int. J. Med. Inform., vol. 75, no. 12, p.829–839, 2006,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.05.039

[13] K. Sousa, H. Mendonça, and J. Vanderdonckt, User Interface Development Life Cycle for Business-Driven Enterprise Applications,, 2009, p.23–34.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84882-206-1_3

[14] R. Mahanti, The Application of Quality Function Deployment to User Interface Design,, Qual. Manag. J., vol. 16, no. 1, p.29, (2009).

[15] Y. Lee, Y. H. Chao, and S. Lin, Structural approach to design user interface,, Comput. Ind., vol. 61, no. 7, p.613–623, 2010,.

[16] A. Seffah and M. Taleb, Tracing the evolution of HCI patterns as an interaction design tool,, Innov. Syst. Softw. Eng., vol. 8, no. 2, p.93–109, 2012,.

DOI: 10.1007/s11334-011-0178-8

[17] J. W. Bang, E. C. Lee, and K. R. Park, New computer interface combining gaze tracking and brainwave measurements,, IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron., vol. 57, no. 4, p.1646–1651, 2011,.

DOI: 10.1109/tce.2011.6131137

[18] C. Zickler, S. Halder, S. C. Kleih, C. Herbert, and A. Kübler, Brain painting: Usability testing according to the user-centered design in end users with severe motor paralysis,, Artif. Intell. Med., vol. 59, no. 2, p.99–110, 2013,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2013.08.003

[19] E. M. Holz, J. Höhne, P. Staiger-Sälzer, M. Tangermann, and A. Kübler, Brain-computer interface controlled gaming: Evaluation of usability by severely motor restricted end-users,, Artif. Intell. Med., vol. 59, no. 2, p.111–120, 2013,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2013.08.001

[20] C. Ziemkiewicz et al., How visualization layout relates to locus of control and other personality factors,, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., vol. 19, no. 7, p.1109–1121, 2013,.

DOI: 10.1109/tvcg.2012.180

[21] S. N. Abbas, M. Abo-Zahhad, and S. M. Ahmed, State-of-the-art methods and future perspectives for personal recognition based on electroencephalogram signals,, IET Biometrics, vol. 4, no. 3, p.179–190, 2015,.

DOI: 10.1049/iet-bmt.2014.0040

[22] K. Das, S. Z. S. Zhang, B. Giesbrecht, and M. P. P. M. P. Eckstein, Using rapid visually evoked EEG activity for person identification,, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, vol. 2009, p.2490–2493, 2009,.

DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2009.5334858

[23] C. N. Gupta, R. Palaniappan, and R. Paramesran, Exploiting the P300 paradigm for cognitive biometrics,, Int. J. Cogn. Biometrics, vol. 1, no. 1, p.26, 2012,.

DOI: 10.1504/ijcb.2012.046513

[24] R. Palaniappan, Method of identifying individuals using VEP signals and neural network,, IEE Proc.-Sci. Meas. Technol, vol. 151, no. 5, p.16–20, 2004,.

DOI: 10.1049/ip-smt:20040003

[25] H. Touyama, EEG-Based Personal Identification,, Intech, (2009).

[26] S. K. Yeom, H. Il Suk, and S. W. Lee, Person authentication from neural activity of face-specific visual self-representation,, Pattern Recognit., vol. 46, no. 4, p.1159–1169, 2013,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2012.10.023

[27] B. C. Armstrong, M. V. Ruiz-Blondet, N. Khalifian, K. J. Kurtz, Z. Jin, and S. Laszlo, Brainprint: Assessing the uniqueness, collectability, and permanence of a novel method for ERP biometrics,, Neurocomputing, vol. 166, p.59–67, 2014,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.04.025

[28] R. Das, E. Maiorana, and P. Campisi, EEG Biometrics Using Visual Stimuli: A Longitudinal Study,, IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 23, no. 3, p.341–345, 2016,.

DOI: 10.1109/lsp.2016.2516043

[29] R. Das, E. Piciucco, E. Maiorana, and P. Campisi, Visually Evoked Potentials for EEG Biometric Recognition,, (2016).

DOI: 10.1109/splim.2016.7528407

[30] I. Perdana, P. Insap, N. Akhmad, and S. Wimbarti, Confirmation of Personality Types Using Visual Evoked Potential with User Interface Design Stimulus – A Research Plan,, Turkish Online J. Qual. Inq., vol. 12, no. 9, p.4130–4138, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://www.tojqi.net/index.php/journal/article/view/6428.

DOI: 10.3844/jcssp.2021.1138.1146