Fashion Design and Production through the Social Economy Lens: Contributions and Challenges for a Holistic Approach

Article Preview

Abstract:

The growing environmental crisis and the proliferation of social inequality, with affective ties to the movements of predatory neoliberal globalization, desperately claim for the constitution of a truly sustainable future. To this end, it is essential to implement ethical, empathic, and cooperative behaviors and the reorientation of the market to consider the coexistence of human beings with nature in harmony. In this context, the global fashion system, characterized by mass production, low cost, and promoting excessive disposable consumption, devalues the natural diversity of the biosphere - from the extraction of raw materials to waste produced in the post-consumption - and contributes, directly and exponentially, to aggravate social inequalities and fracture, increasingly, the imbalance of ecosystems. The concept and practices of the Circular Economy have often been addressed to implement a sustainable production chain; however, it still neglects the social and cultural dimensions. Founded on the fashion production chain processes and their impacts on the lives of those who manufacture garments, on the community and environment in which we live, the purpose of this article is to present a sustainable model for designing and manufacturing fashion products. Social Economy values such as the social development of the people and communities involved, holistic development of the human being, diffusion of feelings of cooperation, respect, solidarity, and commitment, and, above all, ethical behaviors are the groundwork of this study. This framework absorbs characteristics of the Social Economy in the fashion industry and values sustainable human development supported by educational programs for workers, socially responsible sewing workshops, collaborative design, recognition of local knowledge, and social entrepreneurship. Furthermore, this model will empower the wage-earner community that produces fashion by participating in the design and development of apparel products. The methodology used included a literature review and analysis of reports; after identifying critical points of Social Economy theories, this study aims to provide a fairer model for developing products oriented towards the humanization of productive relations, transparency, and sustainability. Despite including SE's humanistic components to fulfill the CE's social gaps, this plan for Social Circularity can only overcome a few of the recurrent problems in fashion production. Standing as an in-progress framework requires both validation and deepening of socio-ecological aspects in implementing a holistic economy in its total multidimensionality.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

139-148

Citation:

Online since:

July 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Minney, S. (2017). Slave to Fashion. London: New Internationalist.

Google Scholar

[2] Hoskins, T. E. (2014). Stitched up. The Anti-Capitalist Book of Fashion. London: Pluto Press.

Google Scholar

[3] Organisation For Economic Co-Operation And Development. (2008). Eco-Efficiency. OECD Publishing: Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264040304-en.

Google Scholar

[4] Melo, B. & Broega, A. (2018). A perspective towards a circular fashion design system,. In Cunha, J., Broega, A.C., Carvalho, H., Blanco, M., García-Badell, G., & Goméz-Chacón, D. (Eds.), Reverse Design: A Current Scientific Vision From the International Fashion and Design Congress (1st ed., pp.675-682). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429428210.

DOI: 10.1201/9780429428210

Google Scholar

[5] Clean Clothes Campaign (n.d.). When I buy a garment, what portion of the cost goes to the workers?,. Retrieved from https://cleanclothes.org/faq/price.

Google Scholar

[6] UNESCO-IHE. (2005). The Water Footprint of Cotton Consumption.

Google Scholar

[7] Clean Clothes Campaign. (2020). The Europe Floor Wage Benchmark: A Living Wage in Central, East and South-East Europe.

Google Scholar

[8] Ditty, S. (2015). Fashion Revolution: It's Time for Revolution [white paper]. Fashion Revolution CIC.

Google Scholar

[9] ILO. (2018). Gender Based Violence in the H&M Garment Supply Chain: Workers Voices From The Global Supply Chain.

Google Scholar

[10] UN General Assembly. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights, (217 [III] A). Paris. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/.

DOI: 10.4337/9781845428297.00024

Google Scholar

[11] Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Vision of a Circular Economy for Fashion, (2020, https://emf.thirdlight.com/link/nbwff6ugh01m-y15u3p/@/preview/1?).

Google Scholar

[12] Moreno, M., Rios, C., Rowe, Z. & Charnley, F. (2016). A Conceptual Framework for Circular Design. Sustainability. 8, 937.

DOI: 10.3390/su8090937

Google Scholar

[13] Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Towards a Circular Economy, (2013, http://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications).

Google Scholar

[14] Ellen MacArthur Foundation, A new textiles economy: Redesigning fashion's future, (2017, http://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications).

Google Scholar

[15] IPCC. (2021). Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S. L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M. I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T. K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press. In Press.

DOI: 10.3410/f.740620545.793587812

Google Scholar

[16] Gismondi, M; Connelly, S; Beckie, N; Markey, S & Roseland, M. (2016). Scaling Up: The Convergence of Social Economy and Sustainability. Edmonton: AU Press.

DOI: 10.15215/aupress/9781771990219.01

Google Scholar

[17] EESC/CIRIEC (2012). The Social Economy in the European Union. European Economic and Social Committee: Brussels.

Google Scholar

[18] Gueslin, A. (1998). L'invention de L'Économie Sociale: Idées, pratiques et imaginaires coopératifs et mutualistes dans la France du XIX siècle, Paris: Economica.

Google Scholar

[19] Coraggio, J. (2011). Economía social y solidaria: el trabajo antes que el capital, Quito: Alberto Acosta y Esperanza Martínez Editores.

Google Scholar

[20] Quarter, J.; Mook, L. & Armstrong, A. (2017). Understanding The Social Economy: A Canadian Perspective. 2ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Google Scholar

[21] Caeiro, J. (2008). Economia social: conceitos, fundamentos e tipologia. Revista Katálysis. Vol. 11, No. 1, p.61–72.

DOI: 10.1590/s1414-49802008000100006

Google Scholar

[22] Barea, J. & Monzón,L. (1992). Libro blanco de la economía social en España, Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo y Seguridad Social.

Google Scholar

[23] EESC (2016). Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on "The Economy for the Common Good: a sustainable economic model geared towards social cohesion (2016/C 013/16 of 17/09/2015).

Google Scholar

[24] Padilla-Rivera, A., Russo-Garrido, S., & Merveille, N. (2020). Addressing the Social Aspects of a Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 12(19), 7912.

DOI: 10.3390/su12197912

Google Scholar

[25] Organisation For Economic Co-Operation And Development (2007). The Social Economy: Building Inclusive Economies. OECD.

Google Scholar

[26] Oliveira, L. (2002). A Economia Social e Solidária Como Alternativa de Enfrentamento a Pobreza. Retrieved from http://www.joinpp.ufma.br/jornadas/joinppIII/html/Trabalhos2/Luciana_Vargas_Netto_Oliveira294.pdf.

Google Scholar

[27] Monzon, J.L. & Chaves, R. (2008), The European Social Economy: Concept And Dimensions Of The Third Sector. Annals Of Public And Cooperative Economics, 79: 549-577.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8292.2008.00370.x

Google Scholar