Numerical Study on the Effects of Coefficient of Friction to the Dynamic Sliding Contact between Bearing and Talar Components of Metal on Polymer Total Ankle Replacement Implants

Article Preview

Abstract:

Coefficient of friction (cof) is an important variable when dealing with con-tact between mechanical parts. It depends on various tribological variables and the value can be determined only by experiments. Cof correlates with the wear of material and this is a severe problem in biomedical engineering. This research numerically studied the effects of cof between talar and bear-ing in the total ankle replacement (TAR) implants. The aim is to evaluate the contact situations affected by cof. The TAR models consist of cobalt chrome (CoCr) alloy and ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) bio-materials. Five cof values of the dry, lubricated and frictionless TAR me-chanical contacts under ankle gait load were examined. The models use a fixed 1 mm element size for UHMWPE bearing component and four element sizes for the talar component, range from 1 mm to 0.4 mm. Results show that, 1) higher cof induces higher contact pressure, 2) contact stress is not af-fected by cof, 3) proper talar element size is 0.4 mm and 4) frictionless model can be used for the TAR contact mechanic computation. Frictionless model calculates equal contact stress and lower contact pressures with an error of 2.68 % compared to the smooth model.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

19-27

Citation:

Online since:

March 2023

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2023 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] K. Imado, A. Miura, M. Nagatoshi, H. Miyagawa and H. Higaki, H., A Study of Coefficient of Friction of UHMWPE in Various Contact Conditions and Measurement of Contact Temperature, Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Part A 69 677 (2003), 121–127.

DOI: 10.1299/kikaia.69.121

Google Scholar

[2] V.N. Malyshev, Tribological aspects in friction stir welding and processing, in M.K.B. Givi, and P. Asadi (Eds), Advances in Friction-Stir Welding and Processing, Woodhead Publishing, (2014).

DOI: 10.1533/9780857094551.329

Google Scholar

[3] O. Kahyaoglu, H. Unal, Friction and wear behaviours of medical grade UHMWPE at dry and lubricated conditions, International Journal of Physical Sciences 7 16 (2012), 2478–2485.

Google Scholar

[4] N. Martinelli, S. Baretta, J. Pagano, A. Bianchi, T. Villa, G. Casaroli and F. Galbusera, Contact stresses, pressure and area in a fixed-bearing total ankle replacement: a finite element analysis, BMC musculoskeletal disorders, BioMed. Central 18 (2017), 493–493.

DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1848-y

Google Scholar

[5] A.P.B. Saad, A. Syahrom, M.N. Harun and M.R.A. Kadir, Wear Prediction on Total Ankle Replacement Effect of Design Parameters, Springer, (2016).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-21723-9_3

Google Scholar

[6] B.J. Elliot, D. Gundapaneni and T. Goswami, Finite element analysis of stress and wear characterization in total ankle replacements, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 34 (2014), 134–145.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.01.020

Google Scholar

[7] S.C. Tadepalli, A. Erdemir and P.R. Cavanagh, A Comparison of the Performance of Hexahedral and Tetrahedral Elements in Finite Element Models of the Foot, ASME 2010 Summer Bioeng. Conf. (2010).

DOI: 10.1115/sbc2010-19427

Google Scholar

[8] S.C. Tadepalli, A. Erdemir and P.R. Cavanagh, Comparison of hexahedral and tetrahedral elements in finite element analysis of the foot and footwear, J. Biomechanics 44 12 (2011), 2337–2343.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.05.006

Google Scholar

[9] D. Gundapaneni, J.T. Tsatalis, R.T. Laughlin and T. Goswami, Wear characteristics of WSU total ankle replacement devices under shear and torsion loads, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 44 (2015), 202–223.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.12.010

Google Scholar

[10] S.M. Scott, M.L. Linden, J.E. Hooper, P. Cowan and T.H. Mercer, Quantification of gait kinematics and walking ability of people with multiple sclerosis who are new users of functional electrical stimulation, J. rehabilitation medicine 45 (2013), 364–369.

DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1109

Google Scholar

[11] D.M. Tetreault and F.E., Kennedy, Friction and wear behavior of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene on Co-Cr and titanium alloys in dry and lubricated environments, Wear 133 (1989), 295–307.

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(89)90043-4

Google Scholar

[12] M. Guezmil, W. Bensalah and S. Mezlini, Tribological behavior of UHMWPE against TiAl6V4 and CoCr28Mo alloys under dry and lubricated conditions, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 63 (2016), 375–385.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.07.002

Google Scholar

[13] D. Nečas, Y. Sawae, T. Fujisawa, K. Nakashima, T. Morita, T. Yamaguchi, M. Vrbka, I. Křupka, and M. Hartl, The Influence of Proteins and Speed on Friction and Adsorption of Metal/UHMWPE Contact Pair, Biotribology 11 (2017), 51–59.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biotri.2017.03.003

Google Scholar

[14] A. Wang, D.C. Sun, S.-S. Yau, B. Edwards, M. Sokol, A. Essner, V.K. Polineni, C. Stark, and J.H. Dumbleton, Orientation softening in the deformation and wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, Wear 203–204 (1997), 230–241.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(96)07362-0

Google Scholar

[15] R. Lee, L. Korduba and A. Wang, An improved theoretical model of orientation softening and cross-shear wear of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene, Wear 271 (2011), 2230–2233.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2010.12.054

Google Scholar

[16] V. Saikko, Effect of contact pressure on wear and friction of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene in multidirectional sliding, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part H: J. Eng. in Medicine 220 (2006), 723–731.

DOI: 10.1243/09544119jeim146

Google Scholar

[17] N. Martinelli, S. Baretta, J. Pagano, A. Bianchi, T. Villa, G. Casaroli and F. Galbusera, Contact stresses, pressure and area in a fixed-bearing total ankle replacement: a finite element analysis, BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18 (2017), 493.

DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1848-y

Google Scholar

[18] S.V. Panin, D.G. Buslovich, L.A. Kornienko, Y.V. Dontsov, V.O. Alexenko and B.B. Ovechkin, Comparison of Structure and Tribotechnical Properties of Extrudable UHMWPE Composites Fabricated by HIP and FDM Techniques, AIP Conf. Proc. 2051 (2018), 020229-1–020229-5.

DOI: 10.1063/1.5083472

Google Scholar

[19] I. Khosravipour, Contact stress analysis of Surface guided knee implant using finite element modeling, Thesis, University of Manitoba, (2015).

Google Scholar

[20] M.T. Makola, and T. Goswami, Hip implant stem interfacial motion, a finite element analysis. International Journal on Experimental and Computational Biomechanics 1 4 (2011), 343–358.

DOI: 10.1504/ijecb.2011.039946

Google Scholar

[21] B. Elliott and T. Goswami, Implant material properties and their role in micromotion and failure in total hip arthroplasty, Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des. 8 1 (2012), 1–7.

DOI: 10.1007/s10999-011-9172-4

Google Scholar