Development of a Performance-Based Specification Model of Combat Clothing for the Procurement Process in Estonia

Article Preview

Abstract:

The topic of the research article is the development of an evaluation method of an ergonomic-based test battery to evaluate the ease of use, cutting solution and materials of the combat clothing uniform of defence forces, which can be added to the procurement sample evaluation system. Evaluation of the ergonomics of the new combat clothing uniform was performed using military recruits who completed a Military Pentathlon test battery in outdoor conditions with eight different obstacles. The comfort and fit of the tested clothes were evaluated using observation and questionnaire. This process was carried out using 47 military personnel of the Estonia Defence Force battalions. Each soldier was measured manually with a tape measure to clarify clothing size and to characterize the test population. From the measurement results, test persons 14, whose measurements corresponded to the size number and height of the two sample combat clothing, were selected. With selected 14 test persons was performed testing of combat clothing outside, which were carried out on the test battery of ergonomic. Their performance evaluated by two external observers with relevant education. After completing the test battery, both, test subjects and observers individually filled the closed-ended questionnaire with a 3-point attitude scale with emoticons about the ergonomic aspects of the combat clothing. The analysis of the answers to the questionnaire showed that the opinions of both the subjects and the observers agreed. Among the 14 subjects, 11 were conscripts. This shows that if a corresponding test track has been prepared for testing the ergonomics of clothing, then giving an assessment to the clothing is understandable to the respondent. The method also facilitates the verification of clothing criteria as performance-based procurement assessment. Not a separate test battery was prepared during this study. This helps to save costs, as it does not require the construction of a specific test battery and is available to many military recruits.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

53-63

Citation:

Online since:

November 2023

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2023 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Public Procurement Act. (2017). RT I, 01.07.2017, information on https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/ee/Riigikogu/act/528022023001/consolide

Google Scholar

[2] O. Kofoworola, A. Konstantas, O. Wolf, D. Wilde, R. Garcia, C. Hidalgo, EU Green Public Procurement (GPP) criteria for textile products and services – Guidance Document, European Commission, JRC120265 (2020).

Google Scholar

[3] G. Bartowiak, A. Greszta, Determaination of a comfort class for protective clothing based on ergonomic tests, Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe. 27(5(137)) (2019) pp.65-74.

DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0013.2904

Google Scholar

[4] S.Y. Son, I. Bakri, S. Muraki, Y. Tochihara, Comparison of firefighters and non-firefighters and the test methods used regarding the effects of personal protective equipment on individual mobility, Applied Ergonomics. 45 (2014)

DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.12.006

Google Scholar

[5] Multiple Authors, 3D Scanning for Clothing Fit and Logistics, STO-TR-HFM-266 (2020).

Google Scholar

[6] I. Daboliņa, E. Lapkovska, 3d digital anthropometry in case of fit and ergonomics of army uniform, Proceedings of 3DBODY.TECH, Switzerland. (2018) pp.106-112

DOI: 10.15221/18.106

Google Scholar

[7] Standing Committee on National Defence (NDDN), Evidence, February 8, 2007, p.3. Information on https://www.ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer/en/39-2/NDDN/report-2/page-18#_ftnref1

Google Scholar

[8] A.E. Kelly, Canadian Forces Load Effects Assessment Program (CAN LEAP) Operation Manual, Humansystems Inc., Canada (2012).

Google Scholar

[9] Ministerie van Defensie. Viewed 13.07.2023 https://www.defensie.nl/organisatie/commit

Google Scholar

[10] Regulations. Military Pentathlon, Part A. Edition (2020).

Google Scholar

[11] D. Heinrich, Marine Corps Load Effects Assessment Program (MC-LEAP) – a standardized test methodology for dismounted soldier systems applicable for Norway?, FFI-rapport 15/01601, Norway (2016).

Google Scholar

[12] EN 17558:2023, Ergonomics - Ergonomics of PPE ensembles. Information on https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/8353e7d3-d731-442a-91bf-eb88c600bf68/en-17558-2023.

Google Scholar

[13] F Interreg BSR Project SWW, Smart and Safety Workwear, 2014 – 2020. Viewed 23.05.2023 https://interreg-baltic.eu/project/sww/#output-0

Google Scholar

[14] D. Gupta ja N. Zakaria, Anthropometry, apparel sizing and design, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2014.

Google Scholar

[15] F.J. Fowler, Survey Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage (2012).

Google Scholar