The Progressive Collapse Behavior of Precast Floor-to-Floor Connections Using Longitudinal and Transverse Ties

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper involves a fundamental study of a numerical method for progressive collapse resistance design of floor-to-floor joints in precast cross-wall structures. It presents a 3D numerical study of a floor-to-floor system with longitudinal and transverse ties. The model is also used to derive the post-bond behavior and the mechanism of forming catenary action concerning the bond behavior in precast cross-wall structures. The obtained results indicated the adequacy and applicability of the code specifications in British Standard, Euro Codes, and DoD 2013. Discrepancies in the tie-force between the numerical results and codified specifications have suggested an inappropriate use of the current TF method, hence, an improved model based on the numerical results has been proposed to address this concern. To the authors’ best knowledge, this is the first numerical study to investigate the behavior of floor-to-floor joints following the removal of wall support in typical precast cross-wall structures when considering bar fracture and pull-out failure mode..

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

113-134

Citation:

Online since:

March 2024

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2024 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Portland Cement Association (PCA) (1975). "Loading Conditionsˮ. Design and Construction of Large-Panel Concrete Structures, report 1.

Google Scholar

[2] Portland Cement Association (PCA) (1976). "Philosophy of Structural Response to Normal and Abnormal Loadsˮ. Design and Construction of Large-Panel Concrete Structures, report 2.

Google Scholar

[3] Portland Cement Association (PCA) (1976). "Wall Panels: Analysis and Design Criteriaˮ. Design and Construction of Large-Panel Concrete Structures, report 3.

Google Scholar

[4] Portland Cement Association (PCA) (1977). "A Design Approach to General StructuralIntegrityˮ. Design and Construction of Large-Panel Concrete Structures, report 4.

Google Scholar

[5] Portland Cement Association (PCA) (1979). "Special Topics ˮ. Design and Construction of Large-Panel Concrete Structures, report 5.

Google Scholar

[6] Portland Cement Association (PCA) (1979). "Design Methodology. Design and Construction of Large-Panel Concrete Structures, report 6.

Google Scholar

[7] Portland Cement Association (PCA). (1978)."Wall Cantilever and Slab Suspension Testsˮ. Design and Construction of Large-Panel Concrete Structures, report A.

Google Scholar

[8] Portland Cement Association (PCA) (1978). "Horizontal Joint Testsˮ. Design and Construction of Large- Panel Concrete Structures, supplemental report B.

Google Scholar

[9] Portland Cement Association (PCA) (1979). "Seismic Tests of Horizontal Jointsˮ. Design and Construction of Large Panel Concrete Structures, Supplementary report C.

Google Scholar

[10] Burnet, E.F.P and Hanson, N.W. (1977). "Experimental Slab Suspension Testsˮ, Design and Construction of Large Panel Concrete Structure, prepared for Office of Policy Development and Concrete Department of Housing and Urban Development, by Portland Cement Association, (PCA).

Google Scholar

[11] Ellingwood, B. R, Smilowit R, Donald O. D, Duthinh D, Nicholas J. C (2007). "Best Practices for Reducing the Potential for Progressive Collapse in Buildingsˮ. U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Google Scholar

[12] Ned M.Cleland, Ph.D.,P.E., President, Blue Ridge Design Inc, Winchester, Va. (2007). Containing Progressive Collapse In Precast Concrete Systems. ASCENT, SUMMER: PP. 26-29.

Google Scholar

[13] British Standard BS 8110-11(1997). The structural use of concrete in building — Part 1: Code of practice for design and construction. London, U.K.

Google Scholar

[14] Merola R. (2009). Ductility and robustness of concrete structures under accident and malicious load cases. PhD. Thesis. School of Civil Engineering, University of Birmingham, U.K.

Google Scholar

[15] Department of Defense (DoD) Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC-04-023-03) (2005). Design Building to Resist Progressive Collapse. Washington, D.C.

Google Scholar

[16] Department of Defense (DoD) Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC-04-023-03) (2013). Design Building to Resist Progressive Collapse. Washington, D.C

Google Scholar

[17] General Service Administration (GSA,2003.)."Progressive Collapse Guidelines ˮ. Washington D.C.

Google Scholar

[18] American Concrete Institute (ACI) Committee.318. (1995). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-95) and Commentary (ACI318R-95). Detroit, MI: ACI

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1076-0431(1996)2:3(120.3)

Google Scholar

[19] BS EN1991-1-7 (2006). Action on Structures - Part 1-7: General Actions- Accidental Action. London, UK.

Google Scholar

[20] Izzuddin BA, Vlassis AG, Elghazouli AY. Nethercot DA. (2008). Progressive collapse of multi-storey buildings due to sudden column loss - Part I: Simplified assessment framework. Eng Struct;30:1308-18

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.011

Google Scholar

[21] Mann A P et al. (2010). "Practical guide to structural robustness and disproportionate collapse in buildings ˮ. Published by the Institution of Structural Engineers, UK

Google Scholar

[22] Dusenberry D. (2002) Review of existing guidelines and provisions related to progressive collapse. Workshop on prevention of progressive collapse. National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington (DC).

Google Scholar

[23] Moore D.B. (2002). The UK and European regulations for accidental actions. In: Proc. workshop on prevention of progressive collapse. National Institute of Building Sciences. Washington (DC).

Google Scholar

[24] Nair R.S. (2004). Progressive collapse basics. Modern steel construction 44(3); 37-44.

Google Scholar

[25] Abruzzo J, Matta A, Panariello G. (2006). Study of mitigation strategies for progressive collapse of a reinforced concrete commercial building. Performance of Constructed Facilities. ASCE 2006: 20(4); 384-390.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0887-3828(2006)20:4(384)

Google Scholar

[26] Li Y, Lu X, Guan H, Ye L. (2011) An improved tie force method for progressive collapse resistance design of reinforced concrete frame structures. Engineering Structure; 33:2931-2942.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.06.017

Google Scholar

[27] Ettouney M, Smilowitz R, Tang M, Hapij A. (2006). Global system considerations for progressive collapse with extensions to other natural and man-made hazards. ASCE J Perform Constr Facil 403–17.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0887-3828(2006)20:4(403)

Google Scholar

[28] Yi W, He Q, Xiao Y, Kunnath S. (2008) Experimental study on progressive collapse resistant behaviour of reinforced concrete frame structures. ACI Structural 105(4): 433–439.

DOI: 10.14359/19857

Google Scholar

[29] Su Y. P, Tian Y, Song X.S.(2009). Progressive collapse resistance of axially-restrained frame beams. ACI Structural Journal; 106(5):600-607.

DOI: 10.14359/51663100

Google Scholar

[30] Yan Y, Gerasimidis S, Deodatis G, Ettouney M. (2013) A study on the global loss of stability progressive collapse mechanisms of steel moment frames. In: Ellingwood, Frangopol, editors. Safety, reliability, risk and life-cycle performance of structure & infrastructures – Deodatis. London: Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN 978-1-138-00086-5.

DOI: 10.1201/b16387-736

Google Scholar

[31] Spyridaki A, Gerasimidis S, Deodatis G, Ettouney M. (2013) A new analytical method on the comparison of progressive collapse mechanism of steel frames under corner column removal. In: Ellingwood, Frangopol (Eds). Safety, reliability, risk and life-cycle performance of structure & infrastructures – Deodatis. London: Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN 978-1-138-00086-5.

DOI: 10.1201/b16387-734

Google Scholar

[32] Tohidi, M., Jang, J., Banipotolos C. (2014). Numerical Evaluation of Codified Design Methods for Progressive Collapse Resistance of Precast Concrete Cross Wall Structures. Engineering Structures 76 (2014) 177–186.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.034

Google Scholar

[33] Tohidi M, Baniotopoulos C. (2017). Use of tie bars to prevent progressive collapse of precast cross wall structures, Engineering Structures 152, 274–288

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.034

Google Scholar

[34] H. Xiao, B. Hedegaard Flexural. (2017). compressive arch, and catenary mechanisms in pseudostatic progressive collapse analysis J Perform Constr Facil, 32 (1) (2017), Article 04017115

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0001110

Google Scholar

[35] Y. Xiao, et al. (2015) Collapse test of three-story half-scale reinforced concrete frame building. ACI Struct J, 112 (4)

DOI: 10.14359/51687746

Google Scholar

[36] 64 X. Lu, et al.(2017). Experimental investigation of RC beam-slab substructures against progressive collapse subject to an edge-column-removal scenario Eng Struct, 149 , pp.91-103

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.07.039

Google Scholar

[37] F. Ma, et al.(2019). Experimental study on the progressive collapse behaviour of RC flat plate substructures subjected to corner column removal scenarios. Eng Struct, 180 (2019), pp.728-741

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.043

Google Scholar

[38] Y.A. Al-Salloum, et al. (2018). Strengthening of precast RC beam-column connections for progressive collapse mitigation using bolted steel plates Eng Struct, 161 (2018), pp.146-160

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.009

Google Scholar

[39] D.D. Joshi, P.V. Patel. (2019). Experimental study of precast dry connections constructed away from beam–column junction under progressive collapse scenario Asian J Civil Eng, 20 (2), pp.209-222

DOI: 10.1007/s42107-018-0099-z

Google Scholar

[40] K. Qian, B. Li. (2018). Performance of precast concrete substructures with dry connections to resist progressive collapse J Perform Constr Facil, 32 (2), Article 04018005

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0001147

Google Scholar

[41] M.H. Alshaikh a, B.H. Abu Bakar a, Emad A.H. Alwesabi a, Hazizan Md Akil b. (2020). Experimental investigation of the progressive collapse of reinforced concrete structures: An overview. Structures, Volume 25, June , Pages 881-900

DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.03.018

Google Scholar

[42] Ibrahim M.H. Alshaikha Aref A. Abadelb Mohammed Alrubaidic. (2022). Precast RC structures' progressive collapse resistance: Current knowledge and future requirements. Engineering Structures. 37, 338-352.

DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.12.086

Google Scholar

[43] Tohidi, M, Jnabey A. (2020). Finite element modeling of progressive failure for floor-to-floor assembly in the precast cross wall structures. J. Struct. Eng, 146(6): 04020087

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002588

Google Scholar

[44] Hibbit K. Sorensen. (2007). ABAQUS: User's Manual, Version 6.7.

Google Scholar