Investigating Characteristics of Solar Panels as Visible Light Communication (VLC) Receivers

Article Preview

Abstract:

Visible light communication has advantages over acoustic and radio wave transmissions in free-space and underwater. The optical transmitters are usually light emitting diodes or laser diodes, and the optical receivers are usually photodiodes or its variants. Solar panels are used for solar energy harvesting to electricity, but the panels are also available in small sizes, and hence, are finding increasing use in optical communications due to larger aperture compared to photodiodes. This work investigated by experiments the characteristics of solar panels as receivers in visible light communication (VLC). In the work, four solar panels of different physical sizes were selected for experiments and measurement. Two characteristics important to communication were investigated. First is the internal resistance at different low illumination levels of white light. Second is response to sinusoidally varying intensity of white light at varying frequencies. For the first study, two of the four panels were investigated; and for the second study, the four solar panels were investigated. An array of seven white LEDs was used as the light source. Also, underwater data communication in saline water was performed for one of the solar panels, and a photodiode in comparison. Results showed that under steady illumination, the internal resistance is both illumination level-dependent and surface area-dependent. It decreases with increase in illumination level, and surface area. Also, the rate of decrease of the internal resistance with illumination increases with surface area. For the frequency response, the cut-off frequency of the solar panel is surface area-dependent, and load-dependent. It decreases with increase in surface area, and increases with decrease in load resistance values (increased loading). For data communication, the maximum data rate obtainable with the solar panel is less to that of the photodiode. The frequency response is important in considering the bandwidth of the solar panels, which also varies with the load, while the internal resistance is important in maximum power point tracking and impedance matching with front end circuits in optical communication receivers.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

161-179

Citation:

Online since:

July 2024

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2024 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] U.M. Qureshi, F.K. Shaikh, Z. Aziz, S.M.Z.S. Shah, A.A. Sheikh, E. Felemban, and S.B. Qaisar, RF path and absorption loss estimation for underwater wireless sensor networks in different water environments, Sensors, 16(890): 1-15, (2016).

DOI: 10.3390/s16060890

Google Scholar

[2] L. Matthew, Y.P. Singh, and S. Sharma, An extensive study on under-water communication using LED/LASER enabled Li-Fi modules, International Journal of Innovative Research in Science Engineering and Technology, 5(11): 19435-19440, (2016).

Google Scholar

[3] T.S. Asha, and K. Drisya, Visible light communication (VLC) and its applications, International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology, 6(2): 72 – 90, (2019).

Google Scholar

[4] B. Soner and S.C. Ergen, Vehicular visible light positioning with a single receiver, IEEE 30th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), pp.1-6, (2019).

DOI: 10.1109/pimrc.2019.8904408

Google Scholar

[5] W. Zhao, M. Kamezaki, K. Yamaguchi, M. Konno, A. Onuki, and S. Sugano, Investigation on image signal receiving performance of photodiodes and solar panel detectors in an underground facility visible light communication system, Optics Express, 29(2): 692-705, (2021).

DOI: 10.1364/oe.413026

Google Scholar

[6] J. Moritz, Audio-to-optical conversion and transmission, Electrical Engineering Department, California Polytechnic State University, USA, (2011).

Google Scholar

[7] L.C. Png, A fully integrated audio, video, and data VLC transceiver system for smartphones and tablets, IEEE 17th International Symposium on Consumer Electronics (ISCE), 249-250, (2013).

DOI: 10.1109/isce.2013.6570210

Google Scholar

[8] Y. He, L. Ding, Y. Gong, and Y. Wang, Real-time audio and video transmission system based on visible light communication, Optics and Photonics Journal, 3(2): 153-157, (2013).

DOI: 10.4236/opj.2013.32b037

Google Scholar

[9] L.C. Png, S.X. Lim, A. Rajamohan, B. Chen, and F.A. Hazman, Design of VLC transceiver circuits for reading light transmission of high-quality audio signals on commercial airliners interaction, IEEE International Symposium on Consumer Electronics, Taiwan, 97 – 98, (2014).

DOI: 10.1109/icce-tw.2014.6904119

Google Scholar

[10] First Sensor Pin PD Data Sheet, 1-3, (2013).

Google Scholar

[11] V. Ramalingam, Thermal efficiency improvement of solar PV module by spectral absorption using water, National Conference on Green Energy-NGE 2013: 1-6, (2013).

Google Scholar

[12] Z. Wang, D. Tsonev, S. Videv, and H. Haas, On the design of a solar-panel receiver for optical wireless communications with simultaneous energy harvesting, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication., 33(8): 1612 – 1623, (2015).

DOI: 10.1109/jsac.2015.2391811

Google Scholar

[13] R. Sarwar, B. Sun, M. Kong, T. Ali, C. Yu, B. Cong, and J. Xu, Visible light communication using a solar panel receiver, 16th International Conference on Optical Communications and Networks (ICOCN): 1-3, (2017).

DOI: 10.1109/icocn.2017.8121577

Google Scholar

[14] X. Chen, C. Min, and J. Guo, Visible light communication system using silicon photocell for energy gathering and data receiving, International Journal of Optics, Vol. 2017, Article ID 6207123, 1-5, (2017).

DOI: 10.1155/2017/6207123

Google Scholar

[15] S.A. Kumar, L. Akash, and J. Deenadyalan, Visible light communication, International Journal of Science and Research, 7(5): 715-720, (2018).

Google Scholar

[16] M. Kong, B. Sun, R. Sarwar, J. Shen, Y. Chen, F. Qu, J. Han, J. Chen, H. Qin, and J. Xu, Underwater wireless optical communication using a lens-free solar panel receiver, Optics Communications, 426: 94 -98, (2018).

DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2018.05.019

Google Scholar

[17] A.M. Humada, S.Y. Darweesh, K.G. Mohammed, M. Kamile, S.F. Mohammed, N.K. Kasim, T.A. Tahseen, O.I. Awad, and S. Mekhile, Modeling of PV system and parameter extraction based on experimental data: Review and investigation, Solar Energy, 199: 742-760, (2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.02.068

Google Scholar

[18] A.M. Zaiton, H.R. Muhammad, and F. Jasman, Solar panel receiver characterisation for indoor visible light communication system, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1502: 1-6, (2020).

DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1502/1/012016

Google Scholar

[19] Z. Tong, X. Yang, H. Zhang, Y. Dai, X. Chen, J. Xu, "Series-connected solar array for high-speed underwater wireless optical links," Optics Letters, 47(5): 1013-1016, (2022).

DOI: 10.1364/ol.449466

Google Scholar

[20] S. Biswas, and H. Kim, Solar cells for indoor applications, progress and development, polymers, 12(1338): 1-23, (2020).

Google Scholar

[21] D. Ma, G. Lan, M. Hassan, W. Hu, and S.K. Das, Sensing, computing, and communications for energy harvesting IoTs: A survey. IEEE Communication Survey Tutorial, 22(4): 1222–1250, (2020).

DOI: 10.1109/comst.2019.2962526

Google Scholar

[22] J. Fakidis, H. Helmers, and H. Haas, Simultaneous wireless data and power transfer for a 1-Gb/s GaAs VCSEL and photovoltaic link. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 32(19): 1277–1280, (2020).

DOI: 10.1109/lpt.2020.3018960

Google Scholar

[23] M. Kong, C. H. Kang, O. Alkhazragi, X. Sun, Y. Guo, M. Sait, J. A. Holguin-Lerma, T. K. Ng, and B. S. Ooi, Survey of energy-autonomous solar cell receivers for satellite–air–ground–ocean optical wireless communication, Progress in Quantum Electronics, 74, (2020), 100300.

DOI: 10.1016/j.pquantelec.2020.100300

Google Scholar

[24] T. Sanislav, G.D. Mois, S. Zeadally, and S.C. Folea, Energy harvesting techniques for internet of things (IoT). IEEE Access, 9: 39530–39549, (2021).

DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3064066

Google Scholar

[25] W. Lei, Z. Chen, Y. Xu, C. Jiang, J. Lin, and J. Fang, Negatively biased solar cell optical receiver for underwater wireless optical communication system with low peak average power ratio. IEEE Photonics Journal, 14(4): 1-9, (2022).

DOI: 10.1109/jphot.2022.3186702

Google Scholar

[26] O. Alamu, T.O. Olwal, and K. Djouani, Simultaneous lightwave information and power transfer in optical wireless communication networks: An overview and outlook. Optik- International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, 266(169590): 1-27, (2022).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.169590

Google Scholar

[27] M. Rosa-Clot, and G.M. Tina, Submerged and floating photovoltaic systems (modeling, design and case studies), 1st Edition, Academic Press, 33-64, USA, (2017).

Google Scholar

[28] J.H. Scofield, Effects of series resistance and inductance on solar cell admittance measurements, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 37(2): 217 – 233, (1995).

DOI: 10.1016/0927-0248(95)00016-x

Google Scholar