Ballistic Penetration Resistance of Reinforced and Non-Reinforced Concrete under High-Velocity Gas-Gun Impact

Article Preview

Abstract:

Concrete is a widely used material for construction, playing a crucial role in infrastructural design. Recently, with the increase in threats and protection requirements, developments and investigations are continually needed in concrete for impact-resistant applications. This study investigates the ballistic performance of sixteen concrete formulations subjected to high-velocity impact using a 12.7×99 mm armour-piercing projectile fired from a single-stage gas gun at an impact velocity of 850 m/s. The experimental campaign evaluated depth of penetration (DOP), mass loss, and failure across different concrete formulations under the same test conditions. Concrete types included ordinary concrete (OC), steel- and basalt-fibre-reinforced mixes, ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC), basalt fibre reinforced concrete (BFRC), rubber aggregate concretes (RSC), and cement-modified variants. Qualitative analysis, high-speed camera sequences, and three-dimensional (3D) scanning were employed to assess the penetration response of each configuration. Results show that UHPC formulations exhibited the best ballistic resistance, with DOP values reduced by nearly 50% compared to ordinary concrete. Steel-fibre-reinforced concretes showed a fibre-dosage-dependent improvement in DOP and material retention, with SF160 emerging as the most balanced solution. In contrast, rubber-modified mixes demonstrated higher DOP but effectively limited surface scabbing. These findings highlight the importance of material composition in optimising ballistic performance and guide the selection of concrete systems for infrastructure protection applications.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

155-164

Citation:

Online since:

December 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A.N. Dancygier, D.Z. Yankelevsky, High strength concrete response to hard projectile impact, Int J Impact Eng 18 (1996) 583–599.

DOI: 10.1016/0734-743X(95)00063-G

Google Scholar

[2] C.W.R. Ong, M.-H. Zhang, H. Du, S.D. Pang, Cellular cement composites against projectile impact, Int J Impact Eng 86 (2015) 13–26.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.06.020

Google Scholar

[3] M. Kristoffersen, O.L. Toreskås, S. Dey, T. Børvik, Ballistic perforation resistance of thin concrete slabs impacted by ogive-nose steel projectiles, Int J Impact Eng 156 (2021) 103957.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.103957

Google Scholar

[4] S. Jamnam, B. Maho, A. Techaphatthanakon, Y. Sonoda, D.-Y. Yoo, P. Sukontasukkul, Steel fiber reinforced concrete panels subjected to impact projectiles with different caliber sizes and muzzle energies, Case Studies in Construction Materials 13 (2020) e00360.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00360

Google Scholar

[5] Ø.E.K. Jacobsen, M. Kristoffersen, S. Dey, T. Børvik, Sustainable shielding: Ballistic performance of low-carbon concrete, Constr Build Mater 415 (2024) 135103.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135103

Google Scholar

[6] N. Das, P. Nanthagopalan, Ballistic impact resistance of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC): A comprehensive experimental investigation and parametric analysis, Int J Impact Eng 187 (2024) 104912.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.104912

Google Scholar

[7] N. Das, P. Nanthagopalan, State-of-the-art review on ultra high performance concrete - Ballistic and blast perspective, Cem Concr Compos 127 (2022) 104383.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104383

Google Scholar

[8] J. Liu, J. Wei, J. Li, Y. Su, C. Wu, A comprehensive review of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) behaviour under blast loads, Cem Concr Compos 148 (2024) 105449.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2024.105449

Google Scholar

[9] P. Shadan, P. Sharafi, N. Saeed, Blast response and protection level of concrete composite wall panels made with recycled tyre fibres in a cement matrix, Constr Build Mater 451 (2024) 138866.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138866

Google Scholar

[10] M. Esaker, G.E. Thermou, L. Neves, Impact resistance of concrete and fibre-reinforced concrete: A review, Int J Impact Eng 180 (2023) 104722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng. 2023.104722.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104722

Google Scholar

[11] W. Sun, W. Zhang, J. Yuan, X. Gao, Y. Wu, W. Ni, J. Feng, Multi-scale study on penetration performance of steel fiber reinforced ultra-high performance concrete, Constr Build Mater 422 (2024) 135846.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135846

Google Scholar

[12] Y. Wang, A.-H. Kang, Z.-G. Wu, P. Xiao, Y.-F. Gong, H.-F. Sun, Investigation of the basalt fiber type and content on performances of cement mortar and concrete, Constr Build Mater 408 (2023) 133720.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133720

Google Scholar

[13] I.A. Ja'e, R.A.N. bin Raja Sazrin, A. Syamsir, N. Bheel, C.V. Amaechi, T.H. Min, V. Anggraini, Optimisation of mechanical properties and impact resistance of basalt fibre reinforced concrete containing silica fume: Experimental and response surface assessment, Developments in the Built Environment 17 (2024) 100368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe. 2024.100368.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dibe.2024.100368

Google Scholar

[14] L.A. Qureshi, B. Ali, A. Ali, Combined effects of supplementary cementitious materials (silica fume, GGBS, fly ash and rice husk ash) and steel fiber on the hardened properties of recycled aggregate concrete, Constr Build Mater 263 (2020) 120636.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120636

Google Scholar

[15] P. Sukontasukkul, S. Jamnam, K. Rodsin, N. Banthia, Use of rubberized concrete as a cushion layer in bulletproof fiber reinforced concrete panels, Constr Build Mater 41 (2013) 801–811.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.12.068

Google Scholar