Application of Topological Optimization Methods on an Automatic Tool Changer Mechanism

Abstract:

The article introduces the possibility and process of the development of a tool changer mechanism. The component in this article is the most important one of the automated tool supply system of modern machine tools. The development direction of newly designed machine tools is mainly determined by the increase in operating speed and efficiency, which is required by industrial expectations. In the complex kinematics of the tool supply system, mass reduction can result in a large decrease in case of energy requirements. In addition to economical operation, harmful dynamic effects can also be diminished. During technical design and development, the choice of design approach and design tool system is important, as the optimal solution can only be considered successful if its technical and economic implications meet the expectations. Thanks to modern computer technology tools, various design-aiding procedures have been created that complement classical design methodologies and help the work of design engineers. Optimization methods (CAE) common in computer-aided design systems (iCAD), such as topology optimization (TO) and the new generative design process (GD), provide effective solutions for design engineers in an increasing number of industrial application areas. Based on the experience gained in product development, it can be observed that simulation-driven design methods can be applied in various areas of industry. The case study of the article presents the computer-aided design process and its characteristics and details the tasks to be performed in each step and also summarizes its effectiveness.

• Periodical: Advances in Science and Technology (Volume 181)
• Pages: 107-115
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-PtGN1P
• Online since: August 2026
• Authors: Kristóf Szabó*
• Keywords: Generative Design, Machine Tools, Product Design, Product Development, Tool Supply System, Topological Optimization

References

[1] Brandenberger, M., Kehl, G. (2004): Coupled Simulation using FEM, MBS and Control Simulation Tools using the Example of a Machine Tool. In: Proceedings of the NAFEMS Seminar Mechatronics in Structural Analysis, Wiesbaden.

[2] Keller, K., Kehl, G. (2006): Coupled FE Analysis of Structure and Control of High Dynamic Machine Tools considering the Machining Centre HELLER MCH 250 as an Example. In: Proceedings of the PERMAS Users Conference, Strasbourg.

[3] Nyhuis, P., Wiendahl, H.-P. (2009): Fundamentals of Production Logistics Theory, Tools and Applications. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

[4] Wiendahl, H.-P. (2010): Betriebsorganisation für Ingenieure. Hanser-Verlag München.

[5] Takács Gy., Zsiga Z., Szabóné M. I., Hegedűs Gy. (2011): Gyártóeszközök módszeres tervezése, Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó, Miskolc.

[6] Némethné Erdődi, K. (2009): Terméktervezési módszerek minőségügyi fejlesztése. PhD értekezés. NymE – CJDI. pp.20-29.

[7] Bercsey, T.; Döbröczöni, Á.; Dupcsák, ZS.; Horák, P.; Kamondi, L.; Kelemen. T.; Péter, J.; Tóth, J. (1997): Terméktervezés és fejlesztés, PHARE TDQM, Budapest.

[8] Bercsey, T.; Horváth, I.: A korszerű géptervezés feltételei, módszerei és eszközrendszere, GÉP, Vol. 37., No 11., 1985.

[9] Kamondi, L.; Döbröczöni, Á.; Takács, Á. (2006): Objektum semleges géptervezés (Szakmérnöki jegyzet), Készült: "A felsőoktatás szerkezeti és tartalmi fejlesztése" CAD/CAM/FEM kompetencia kurzusok projekt keretében (HEFOP-3.8-P-2004-06-0012). Miskolc.

[10] Takács, GY.: Szerszámgépek strukturális tervezése grafikus adatbázisokkal, egyetemi doktori értekezés, Miskolc, 1996.

[11] All3DP (2022): The best generative design software of 2022. https:// all3dp. com/1/ the- best- gener ative- design- softw are- of-2022/. Accessed 17 Nov 2022.

[12] Autodesk Inc (2022): Product documentation. https:// help. autod esk. com/ view/ fusio n360/ ENU/? guid= GUID- 4EB16 696- 8951-47BC- 8F15- 10E61 4D899 4F.

[13] Zhang Y., Wang Z., Zhang Y., Gomes S., Bernard A. (2020): Bioinspired generative design for support structure generation and optimization in additive manufacturing (AM). CIRP Ann 69(1):117–120. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. cirp. 2020. 04. 091.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2020.04.091

[14] Bagassi S., Lucchi F., De Crescenzio F., Persiani F. (2016): Generative design: advanced design optimization processes for aeronautical applications. In: 30th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, ICAS 2016.

[15] Shea K., Aish R., Gourtovaia M. (2005): Towards integrated performance-driven generative design tools. Autom Constr 14(2):253–264. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. autcon. 2004. 07. 002.

DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2004.07.002

[16] Rubaiat, H. K., Grossman, T., Cheong, H., Hashemi, A., Fitzmaurice, G., DreamSketch (2017): Early stage 3D design explorations with sketching and generative design., UIST 2017 - Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. Association for Computing Machinery 401–414. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1145/ 31265 94. 31266 62.

DOI: 10.1145/3126594.3126662

[17] Karlberg, M., Löfstrand, M., Sandberg, S., Lundin, M. (2013): State of the art in simulation-driven design. Int J of Product Development 18:68–87. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1504/ IJPD. 2013. 052166.

DOI: 10.1504/ijpd.2013.052166