Atom Probe Tomography: Studying Reactions on Top of the Tip

Abstract:

Down-scaling is a major principle of modern technology. As a consequence, the stability of many technical devices is controlled by solid state reactions that proceed on the range of a few nanometres only. On such a short length scale even basic aspects of reaction physics as fundamental as e.g. the Ficks laws of diffusion, need to be reconsidered. Only very few dedicated techniques are suitable to study atomic transport and reactions with sufficient accuracy. Among them, the atom probe tomography is exceptional, as it allows the detection and localization of individual atoms with an accuracy of a lattice constant. An almost complete reconstruction of the 3D atomic arrangement of different atomic species gets possible. This article provides an overview on recent atom probe studies of reactive diffusion. After an introduction into the principles of the analysis method, physical mechanisms of solid state reactions are discussed in view of recent experiments at metallic thin film interfaces. How does nucleation of an interfacial product take place In which way do grain boundaries influence the reaction As a technical example, the stability of Cu/NiFe GMR sensor layers is discussed.

• Periodical: Advances in Science and Technology (Volume 46)
• Pages: 126-135
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AST.46.126
• Online since: October 2006
• Authors: Guido Schmitz, Constantin Ene, Ch. Lang, Vitaliy Vovk
• Keywords: Atom Probe Tomography (APT), GMR Sensors, Nucleation, Triple Junction Diffusion

References

[1] M. K. Miller, Atom Probe Tomography, Kluwer Academic, New York (2000).

[2] T. Al-Kassab, H. Wollenberger, G. Schmitz, R. Kirchheim in: High Resolution Imaging and Spectrometry of Materials, Ernst, T. and Rühle, M. (Eds. ), Springer, Berlin 2003, p.290.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-07766-5_6

[3] D. J. Larson at al., Microsc. Microanal. 7 (2001) p.24.

[4] J. Schleiwies and G. Schmitz, Mat. Sci. Eng. A327 (2002) p.94.

[5] C. Michaelsen, K. Barmak, and T. P. Weihs, J. Phys. D, 30 (1997) p.3167.

[6] R. Roy and S. K. Sen, J. Mat. Sci., 27 (1992) p.6098.

[7] C. Bergmann, E. Emeric, G. Clugnet, and P. Gas, Def. Diff. Forum, 194-199 (2001) p.1533.

[8] K. R. Coffey et al., Appl. Phys. Lett., 55 (1989) p.852.

[9] A.M. Gusak, Ukr. Phys. J., 35 (1990) p.725.

[10] P. J. Desré and R. Yavari, Phys. Rev. Lett, 64 (1990) p.1533.

[11] F. Hodaj and P. J. Desré, Acta Mater., 44 (1996) 4485.

[12] V. Vovk, G. Schmitz, R. Kirchheim, Phys. Rev. B 69 (2004) 104102.

[13] M. O. Pasichnyy, G. Schmitz, A. M. Gusak and V. Vovk, Phys. Rev. B 72 (2005) 014118.

[14] Gust book.

[15] B. Bockstein et al. , Mat. Sci. Eng. A302 (2001) p.151.

[16] C. Lang and G. Schmitz, Mat. Sci. Eng. A 353 (2003) pp.119-125.

[17] L. M. Klinger, L. A. Levin, and A. L. Petelin, Def. Diff. Forum 143-147 (1997) p.1523.

[18] M. Hecker et al., J. Magn Magn. Mater. 247 (2002) p.62.

[19] L. van Loyen, et al. , J. Appl. Phys. 87 (2000) p.4852.

[20] C. B. Ene, G. Schmitz, R. Kirchheim, and A. Hütten, Acta mat. 53 (2005) p.3383.