Experimental Assessment of Structural Control Devices Used to Protect Civil Buildings

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents the latest developments realized at the European Laboratory for Structural Assessment (ELSA) of the Joint Research Centre (JRC) to extend the 'on-line testing method with substructuring' to the experimental verification of civil buildings protected by semiactive devices. Recent works have indicated that semiactive control systems can achieve significantly better results than passive control systems and demonstrate significant potential for controlling structural responses to a wide variety of dynamic loading conditions. These factors explain the considerable interest in the practical implementation of these systems for protection of civil infrastructures against earthquake and wind loading or, more generally, for vibration mitigation. Commonly, cyclic tests are initially performed to characterize the semiactive device behavior but a complete validation requires the simulation of realistic dynamic loads including the effects of the protected structure and the evaluation in real world of the performance and robustness of different control laws and related instrumentation before the final hardware implementation. Experimental verifications satisfying such requirements can be achieved by using the novel extension of the on-line testing procedure presented here.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

271-276

Citation:

Online since:

September 2008

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2008 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] P. Pegon, G. Magonette, 2002: Continuous PSD Testing with Non-linear Substructuring: presentation of a stable parallel inter-field procedure, JRC Special Publication no SPI.02.167, IPSC, Joint Research Centre, 21027 Ispra (VA), Italy.

Google Scholar

[2] P. Pegon, G. Magonette, 2005: Continuous PSD Testing with Non-linear Substructuring: using the operator Splitting technique to avoid iterative procedurse, JRC Special Publication no SPI.05.30, IPSC, Joint Research Centre, 21027 Ispra (VA), Italy.

Google Scholar

[3] R. Bairrao, R. Severn, 2007: Experiences under Ecoleader - European Consortium of Laboratories for Earthquake and Dynamic Experimental, Report No. 8, pp.128-132, LNEC Avenida do Brasil 101, 1700-066 Lisboa, Portugal, ISBN: 972-49-1972-2

DOI: 10.3808/jei.202100450

Google Scholar

[4] J. Rodellar, N. Luo, R. Villamizar, J. Vehi, 2003: Robust Control Law for a Friction-based semiactive controller of a two-span bridge, The International Society for Optical Engineering, Vol. 5057, Smart Systems and NDE for Civil Infrastructures [28], 2-6 March (2003)

DOI: 10.1117/12.482706

Google Scholar

[5] A. Bossi, 2003: Isolamento sismico: Prove di Dispositivi con il Metodo Pseudo-dinamico Continuo con Sottostrutturazione, Tesi di Laurea, Universita degli studi di Perugia, Italy

Google Scholar

[6] European Commission, Seventh Framework Programme, Capacities, Research Infrastructure, Project E-FAST-Design Study of a European Facility for Advanced Seismic Testing, Grant Agreement 212109, December 2007.

Google Scholar