Mechanical Properties of Rammed Earth Stabilized with Local Waste and Recycled Materials

Abstract:

Traditional techniques of construction using natural and locally available materials are nowadays raising the interest of architects and engineers. Clayey soil is widely present in all continents and regions, and where available it is obtained directly from the excavation of foundations, avoiding transportation costs and emissions due to the production of the binder. Moreover, raw earth is recyclable and reusable after the demolition, thanks to the absence of the firing process. The rammed earth technique is based on earth compressed into vertical formworks layer by layer to create a wall. This material owes its strength to the compaction effort and due to its manufacture procedure exhibits layers resembling the geological strata and possessing high architectural value. The hygroscopic properties of rammed earth allow natural control of the indoor humidity, keeping it in the optimal range for human health. Stabilization with lime or cement is the most common procedure to enhance the mechanical and weather resistance at once. This practice compromises the recyclability of the earth and reduces the hygroscopic properties of the material. The use of different natural stabilizers, fibers, and natural polymers by-products of the agriculture and food industry, can offer an alternative that fits the circular economy requirements. The present study analyses the mechanical strength of an Italian earth stabilized with different local waste and recycled materials that do not impair the final recyclability of the rammed earth.

• Periodical: Construction Technologies and Architecture (Volume 1)
• Pages: 113-123
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/CTA.1.113
• Online since: January 2022
• Authors: Alessia Emanuela Losini*, Liudmila Lavrik, Marco Caruso, Monika Woloszyn, Anne Cecile Grillet, Giovanni Dotelli, Paola Gallo Stampino
• Keywords: Circular Economy, Eco-Friendly Binders, Mechanical Properties, Rammed Earth, Sustainable Materials

References

[1] Arrigoni, A., Grillet, A.C., Pelosato, R., Dotelli, G., Beckett, C.T.S., Woloszyn, M., Ciancio, D., 2017. Reduction of rammed earth's hygroscopic performance under stabilisation: an experimental investigation. Build. Environ. 115, 358–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.01.034.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.01.034

[2] ASTM D1557, 2007. ASTM D1557-07 Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort. Annu. B. ASTM Stand. 3, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1520/D1557-07.1.

[3] ASTM D2166/D2166M, 2016. Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil, in: ASTM International.

[4] Aubert, J.E., Fabbri, A., Morel, J.C., Maillard, P., 2013. An earth block with a compressive strength higher than 45 MPa! Constr. Build. Mater. 47, 366–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.068.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.068

[5] Avrami, E., Guillaud, H., Hardy, M., 2008. Terra Literature Review An Overview of Research in Earthen Architecture Conservation undefined-undefined.

[6] Aymerich, F., Fenu, L., Meloni, P., 2012. Effect of reinforcing wool fibres on fracture and energy absorption properties of an earthen material. Constr. Build. Mater. 27, 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.008.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.008

[7] Bruno, A.W., Gallipoli, D., Perlot, C., Mendes, J., 2017. Mechanical behaviour of hypercompacted earth for building construction. Mater. Struct. Constr. 50. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-017-1027-5.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-017-1027-5

[8] Burroughs, S., 2010. Recommendations for the Selection, Stabilization, and Compaction of Soil for Rammed Earth Wall Construction. J. Green Build. 5, 101–114. https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.5.1.101.

DOI: 10.3992/jgb.5.1.101

[9] Champiré, F., Fabbri, A., Morel, J.-C., Wong, H., McGregor, F., 2016. Impact of relative humidity on the mechanical behavior of compacted earth as a building material. Constr. Build. Mater. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.027.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.027

[10] Chauhan, P., El Hajjar, A., Prime, N., Plé, O., 2019. Unsaturated behavior of rammed earth: Experimentation towards numerical modelling. Constr. Build. Mater. 227, 116646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.08.027.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.08.027

[11] Choi, I.S., Lee, Y.G., Khanal, S.K., Park, B.J., Bae, H.J., 2015. A low-energy, cost-effective approach to fruit and citrus peel waste processing for bioethanol production. Appl. Energy 140, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.11.070.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.11.070

[12] Danso, H., Martinson, D.B., Ali, M., Williams, J.B., 2015. Physical, mechanical and durability properties of soil building blocks reinforced with natural fibres. Constr. Build. Mater. 101, 797–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.069.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.069

[13] Fantilli, A.P., Sicardi, S., Dotti, F., 2017. The use of wool as fiber-reinforcement in cement-based mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 139, 562–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat. 2016.10.096.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.096

[14] Galán-Marín, C., Rivera-Gómez, C., Petric, J., 2010. Clay-based composite stabilized with natural polymer and fibre. Constr. Build. Mater. 24, 1462–1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.conbuildmat.2010.01.008.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.01.008

[15] GlobalABC, UNEP, IEA, 2018. 2018 Global Status Report: towards a zero‐emission, efficient and resilient buildings and construction sector 73. https://doi.org/978-3-9818911-3-3.

[16] Houben, H. and Guillaud, H., 1994. Earth construction: a comprehensive guide, Habitat International.

[17] Keita, I., Sorgho, B., Dembele, C., Plea, M., Zerbo, L., Guel, B., Ouedraogo, R., Gomina, M., Blanchart, P., 2014. Ageing of clay and clay-tannin geomaterials for building. Constr. Build. Mater. 61, 114–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.005.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.005

[18] Losini, A.E., Stampino, P.G., Dotelli, G., Bellotto, M., Grillet, A.C., Caruso, M., Sabbadini, S., Outin, J., 2019. Evaluation of different raw earthen plasters stabilized with lime for bio-building exploitation, Academic Journal of Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.26168/icbbm2019.25.

[19] Maniatidis, V., Walker, P., 2003. A review of rammed earth construction. Dev. rammed earth UK Hous. 109.

[20] Minke, G., 2012. Building with earth. Walter de Gruyter.

[21] Moevus, M., Anger, R., Fontaine, L., 2012. Hygro-Thermo-Mechanical Properties of Earthen Materials for Construction : a Literature Review. Terra 2012 1–10.

[22] Moody, V., Needles, H.L., 2004. Major Fibers and Their Properties, in: Tufted Carpet. Elsevier, p.35–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-188420799-0.50004-x.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-188420799-0.50004-x

[23] Morel, J.C., Mesbah, A., Oggero, M., Walker, P., 2001. Building houses with local materials: means to drastically reduce the environmental impact of construction. Build. Environ. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(00)00054-8.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-1323(00)00054-8

[24] Petek, B., Logar, R.M., 1234. Management of waste sheep wool as valuable organic substrate in European Union countries. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 23, 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-01121-3.

DOI: 10.1007/s10163-020-01121-3

[25] Rahman, I.A., 2019. Investigation of suction and shrinkage properties of earth-based materials for sustainable buildings.

[26] Statuto, D., Sica, C., Picuno, P., 2018. Experimental development of clay bricks reinforced with agricultural by-products. Actual Tasks Agric. Eng.

[27] Villoria Sáez, P., Osmani, M., 2019. A diagnosis of construction and demolition waste generation and recovery practice in the European Union. J. Clean. Prod. 241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118400.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118400

[28] Vissac, A., Bourgès, A., Gandreau, D., Anger, R., Fontaine, L., 2017. Argiles & Biopolymères.