Life Cycle Assessment of Circular Bio-Based Construction

Abstract:

The construction sector is a large consumer of non-renewable resources and it is responsible of 44% of global energy related CO₂ emissions. Circular economy is an emerging strategy that has potential to make significant improvements in the construction industry, by taking efficient and sustainable actions against climate change. The principles of circular economy are to minimise the waste of resources, by maximizing materials' performances, whilst in use, and recycle and regenerate them at the end of their service life. Natural materials can potentially be suitable in this strategy, due to the use of renewable resources, carbon sequestration potential, and high suitability for reuse and recycling. The development of bio-based wall panel is a first step into the integration of a circular economy approach in the construction sector. In this study, vapour responsive bio-based panel prototypes with low thermal transmittance (U<0.20 W/m²K) are being designed, taking into consideration the burdens and benefits of natural materials over their entire life cycle. The challenge is to assess the environmental impact of the panels during their design and production, maximise performance and life span, when in use, and regenerate and recycle panel components at the end of the service life. In this paper, a life cycle assessment of a prototype bio-based panel designed with circular economy principles is investigated. The environmental impact of the panel is analysed to investigate limitation in assessing emissions and use of resources in a circular prospective. The objective of the research is to integrate environmental impact analysis during the early stage of panel design. This will put the basis for the development of a sustainable and circular building industry and for identifying area of improvements for the development of sustainable circular panels with expected hygrothermal benefits conferred using bio-based materials.

• Periodical: Construction Technologies and Architecture (Volume 1)
• Pages: 124-134
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/CTA.1.124
• Online since: January 2022
• Authors: Valeria Cascione*, Matt Roberts, Stephen Allen, Barrie Dams, Daniel Maskell, Andrew Shea
• Keywords: Bio-Based Materials, Circular Economy, Environmental Impact, Life Cycle Assessment

References

[1] Akanbi, L.A., Oyedele, L.O., Omoteso, K., Bilal, M., Akinade, O.O., Ajayi, A.O., Delgado, and Owolabi, H.A., 2019. Disassembly and deconstruction analytics system (D-DAS) for construction in a circular economy. Journal of cleaner production, 223, p.386.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.172

[2] Böttger, W., van Olphen, W., Sluis, J. and Lepelaar, M., 2019. Development of interactive facade elements on base of waste materials of water companies. Academic Journal of Civil Engineering, 37(2), pp.672-677.

[3] BSI, BS EN 15804:2012+A2:2019. Sustainability of construction works — Environmental product declarations — Core rules for the product category of construction products, (2019).

DOI: 10.3403/30259256

[4] BSI, BS EN ISO 6946:2007. Building components and building elements-thermal resistance and thermal resistance-calculation method, (2007).

DOI: 10.3403/00942964u

[5] da Silva, C.F.F., Rana, C., Maskell, D., Dengel, A., Ansell, M.P. and Ball, R.J.,2016. Influence of eco-materials on indoor air quality. Strategies for applying the circular economy to prefabricated buildings. Green Materials, 4(2), pp.72-80.

DOI: 10.1680/jgrma.16.00002

[6] Cancer Council 2017 Causes of cancer, Cancer Council, viewed 21 May 2018, <https://www.cancer.org.au/about-cancer/causes-of-cancer/>.

[7] Esposito, M., TT (March 13, 2018). The development of the circular economy shapes new managerial and policy implications. California Management Review, 60, pp.5-19.

[8] EuGeos, (2020). EuGeos' 1584_A2-IA Database V4.1: method. https://nexus.openlca.org/ database/EuGeos'%2015804-IA.

[9] EU, 2020. 2030 climate and energy framework. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/ 2030_en.

[10] Fouquet, M., Levasseur, A., Margni, M., Lebert, A., Lasvaux, S., Souyri, B., Buhé, C. and Woloszyn, M., 2015. Methodological challenges and developments in LCA of low energy buildings: Application to biogenic carbon and global warming assessment. Building and Environment, 90, pp.51-59.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.03.022

[11] Geldermans, B. and Jacobson, L. R., 2015. Circular material and product flows in buildings. Statewide Agricultural Land Use Baseline 2015 1(October), 1–23.

[12] Henry, B., Ledgard, S., Nebel, B. and Wiedemann, T., 2017. Guidelines for conducting a life cycle assessment of the environmental performance of wool textiles. Brussels: International Wool Textile Organisation–Wool LCA Technical Advisory Group. Last accessed, 29.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100169-1.00010-1

[13] IEA (International Energy Agency), 2018. 2018 Global Status Report, Towards a Zero-emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector. report for the Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction (GlobalABC).

[14] Ilic, D.D., Eriksson, O., Ödlund, L. and Åberg, M., 2018. No zero-burden assumption in a circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, pp.352-362.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.031

[15] Ip, K. and Miller, A., 2012. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of hemp–lime wall constructions in the UK. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, n 69, pp.1-9.

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.09.001

[16] Jansen, B.W., van Stijn, A., Gruis, V. and van Bortel, G., 2020. A circular economy life cycle costing model (CE-LCC) for building components. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161, p.104857.

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104857

[17] Kallakas, H., Liblik, J., Alao, P.F., Poltimäe, T., Just, A. and Kers, J., 2019, June. Fire and Mechanical Properties of Hemp and Clay Boards for Timber Structures. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 290, No. 1, p.012019). IOP Publishing.

DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/290/1/012019

[18] Lawrence, M., Shea, A., Walker, P. and De Wilde, P., 2013. Hygrothermal performance of bio-based insulation materials. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Construction Materials, 166(4), pp.257-263.

DOI: 10.1680/coma.12.00031

[19] LETI London Energy Transformation Initiative, 2020. Climate Emergency Design Guide. LETI: London, UK.

[20] Maskell, D., Thomson, A. and Walker, P., 2018. Multi-criteria selection of building materials. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers–Construction Materials, 171(2), pp.49-58.

DOI: 10.1680/jcoma.16.00064

[21] Mesa, J., Esparragoza, I. and Maury, H., 2018. Developing a set of sustainability indicators for product families based on the circular economy model. Journal of cleaner production, 196, pp.1429-1442.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.131

[22] Minunno, R., O'Grady, T., Morrison, G.M., Gruner, R.L. and Colling, M., 2018. Strategies for applying the circular economy to prefabricated buildings. Buildings, 8(9), p.125.

DOI: 10.3390/buildings8090125

[23] Mirzaie, S., Thuring, M. and Allacker, K., 2020. End-of-life modelling of buildings to support more informed decisions towards achieving circular economy targets. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, pp.1-18.

DOI: 10.1007/s11367-020-01807-8

[24] NFU, 2018. The Value of the Sheep Industry: North East, South West and North West Region. [Online]. Accessed 9 November 2020. https://www.nfuonline.com/assets/106083.

[25] Niero, M. and Olsen, S.I., 2016. Circular economy: to be or not to be in a closed product loop? A Life cycle assessment of aluminium cans with inclusion of alloying elements. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 114, pp.18-31.

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.06.023

[26] Nijgh, M.P. and Veljkovic, M., 2019, February. Design of composite flooring systems for reuse. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 225, No. 012026, pp.1755-1315.

DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/225/1/012026

[27] Palumbo, M., Lacasta, A.M., Holcroft, N., Shea, A. and Walker, P., 2016. Determination of hygrothermal parameters of experimental and commercial bio-based insulation materials. Construction and Building Materials, 124, pp.269-275.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.106

[28] Pittau, F., Amato, C., Cuffari, S., Iannaccone, G. and Malighetti, L.E., 2019, July. Environmental consequences of refurbishment vs. demolition and reconstruction: a comparative life cycle assessment of an Italian case study. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 296, No. 1, p.012037). IOP Publishing.

DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/296/1/012037

[29] Ranta, V., Aarikka-Stenroos, L. and Mäkinen, S.J., 2018. Creating value in the circular economy: A structured multiple-case analysis of business models. Journal of cleaner production, 201, pp.988-1000.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.072

[30] Roberts, M., Allen, S. and Coley, D., 2020. Life cycle assessment in the building design process–A systematic literature review. Building and Environment, p.107274.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107274

[31] Sariatli, F., 2017. Linear Economy versus Circular Economy: A comparative and analyzer study for Optimization of Economy for Sustainability. Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development, 6(1), pp.31-34.

DOI: 10.1515/vjbsd-2017-0005

[32] WGBC World Green Building Council, 2019. Bringing embodied carbon upfront: Coordinated action for the building and construction sector to tackle embodied carbon.