Evaluation of Bio-Based Earth Engineered Mortars for Low Energy and Carbon Buildings in Tropical and Subtropical Climates

Abstract:

Improving the thermal performance of low-income housing in developing countries, located in tropical and subtropical regions, is one of the main challenges of the building sector. The use of mortars as building cladding is a current practice in many developing countries. Bio-based (such as bamboo particles) and earth materials have shown interesting potential for improving some thermal properties of covering mortars. In addition, bio-based earth mortars can have a lower carbon footprint than conventional mortars (typically made of cement or cement with lime) used in the building sector. The aim of this study is the evaluation of the life cycle GHG emissions of different mixtures of an engineered bio-based earth mortar mixed with bamboo particles, earth, and different cementitious materials (Portland cement, hydrated lime, metakaolin, and fly ash) and water. Four mixtures are evaluated: without bamboo particles, with 3%, 6%, and 9% of bamboo particles in volume. The thermal energy performance and carbon footprint of these mortars are evaluated. From physical tests carried out in the laboratory, thermal energy simulations are carried out in DesignBuilder software considering a case study of a social housing project in Brazil, evaluating tropical and subtropical climates. Finally, the carbon footprint was performed, using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology considering a cradle-to-gate scope. When compared with two conventional mortars (made of cement and hydrated lime), the bio-based earth mortar presents better thermal energy performance and a lower carbon footprint. We can conclude that there is a potential to improve the thermal energy performance in low-income housing and, at the same time, to reduce the mortar carbon footprint. This mortar can be produced where bamboo and cementitious materials are available, which is the case in several developing countries that are expected to have a substantial housing demand for new buildings in the coming years.

• Periodical: Construction Technologies and Architecture (Volume 1)
• Pages: 203-210
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/CTA.1.203
• Online since: January 2022
• Authors: Rayane de Lima Moura Paiva*, Lucas Rosse Caldas, Patrícia Brandão Souza, Giulia Fea Oliveira, Romildo Dias Toledo Filho
• Keywords: Bamboo, Carbon Footprint, Earth, LCA, Thermal-Energy Simulation

References

[1] Amziane, S., Sonebi, M., 2016. Overview on bio-based building material made with plant aggregate Overview on bio-based building material made with plant aggregate 31–38.

DOI: 10.21809/rilemtechlett.2016.9

[2] Arrigoni, A., Pelosato, R., Melià, P., Ruggieri, G., Sabbadini, S., Dotelli, G., 2017. Life cycle assessment of natural building materials: the role of carbonation, mixture components and transport in the environmental impacts of hempcrete blocks. J. Clean. Prod. 149, 1051–1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.161.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.161

[3] Brazilian Association of Technical Standards, 2005. Mortars applied on walls and ceilings - Determination of the specific gravity in the hardened stage: NBR 13280. Rio de Janeiro.

[4] Caldas, L.R., Carvalho, M.T.M., Toledo Filho, R.D., 2020a. Avaliação de estratégias para a mitigação dos impactos ambientais de revestimentos argamassados no Brasil 20, 343–362.

DOI: 10.1590/s1678-86212020000300433

[5] Caldas, L.R., Da Gloria, M.Y.R., Pittau, F., Andreola, V.M., Habert, G., Toledo Filho, R.D., 2020b. Environmental impact assessment of wood bio-concretes: Evaluation of the influence of different supplementary cementitious materials. Constr. Build. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121146.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121146

[6] Caldas, L.R., Paiva, R. de L.M., Martins, A.P. de S., Toledo Filho, R.D., 2020c. Argamassas de terra versus convencionais: avaliação do desempenho ambiental considerando o ciclo de vida. Mix Sustentável 6, 115–128.

DOI: 10.29183/2447-3073.mix2020.v6.n4.115-128

[7] Caldas, L.R., Saraiva, A.B., Andreola, V.M., Dias, R., Filho, T., 2020d. Bamboo bio-concrete as an alternative for buildings ' climate change mitigation and adaptation. Constr. Build. Mater. 263, 120652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120652.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120652

[8] Dolezal, F., Hill, C.A.S., Escamilla, E.Z., 2017. i Forest. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2386-010.

[9] EN, 2012. EN 15804:2012 + A2:2019 - Sustainability of construction works — Environmental product declarations — Core rules for the product category of construction products. Int. Stand.

DOI: 10.3403/30259256

[10] Faria, P., Dias, I., Jamú, N., Silva, V., 2014. Air lime-earth blended mortars-assessment on fresh state and workability. Earthen Archit. Past, Present Futur. 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17392.

DOI: 10.1201/b17392-26

[11] Gomes, M.I., Faria, P., Gonçalves, T.D., 2018. Earth-based mortars for repair and protection of rammed earth walls. Stabilization with mineral binders and fibers. J. Clean. Prod. 172, 2401–2414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.170.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.170

[12] González Mahecha, R.E., Caldas, L.R., Garaffa, R., Lucena, A.F.P., Szklo, A., Toledo Filho, R.D., 2020. Constructive systems for social housing deployment in developing countries: a case study using dynamic life cycle carbon assessment and cost analysis in Brazil. Energy Build. 227, 110395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110395.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110395

[13] Guest, G., Cherubini, F., Strømman, A.H., 2012. Global Warming Potential of Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Biomass Stored in the Anthroposphere and Used for Bioenergy at End of Life 17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00507.x.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00507.x

[14] Hamard, E., Cazacliu, B., Razakamanantsoa, A., Morel, J.C., 2016. Cob, a vernacular earth construction process in the context of modern sustainable building. Build. Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.06.009.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.06.009

[15] ISO, 2006. 14040: Environmental management–life cycle assessment—Principles and framework. Int. Organ. Stand.

[16] Lagerblad, B., 2005. Carbon dioxide uptake during concrete life cycle: state of the art.

[17] PBMC, 2018. Role of Bio-based Building Materials in Climate Change Mitigation: Special Report of the Brazilian Panel on Climate Change. Rio de Janeiro.

[18] Pittau, F., Krause, F., Lumia, G., Habert, G., 2018. Fast-growing bio-based materials as an opportunity for storing carbon in exterior walls. Build. Environ. 129, 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.12.006.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.12.006

[19] Publication, B.S.I.S., 2014. PD CEN ISO / TS 14067 : 2014 BSI Standards Publication Greenhouse gases — Carbon footprint of products — Requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication ( ISO / TS.

DOI: 10.3403/30244913

[20] Röck, M., Saade, M.R.M., Balouktsi, M., Rasmussen, F.N., Birgisdottir, H., Frischknecht, R., Habert, G., Lützkendorf, T., Passer, A., 2020. Embodied GHG emissions of buildings – The hidden challenge for effective climate change mitigation. Appl. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114107.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114107

[21] Röhlen, U., Ziegert, C., 2011. Earth Building Practice, 1st ed. Bauwerk-Beuth Verlag, Berlin.

[22] Santos, T., Nunes, L., Faria, P., 2018. Production of eco-efficient earth-based plasters: Influence of composition on physical performance and bio-susceptibility. J. Clean. Prod. 167, 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.131.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.131

[23] Satola, D., Houlihan-wiberg, A., Gustavsen, A., 2021. Life Cycle GHG Emissions of Residential Buildings in Humid Subtropical and Tropical Climates : Systematic Review and Analysis.

DOI: 10.3390/buildings11010006

[24] UNEP, 2019. Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction. Towards a zero-emissions, effi cient and resilient buildings and constructi on sector.

[25] Viel, M., Collet, F., Lanos, C., 2018. Chemical and multi-physical characterization of agro-resources' by-product as a possible raw building material. Ind. Crops Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.04.025.

DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.04.025

[26] Zea Escamilla, E., Habert, G., 2014. Environmental impacts of bamboo-based construction materials representing global production diversity. J. Clean. Prod. 69, 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.067.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.067