The Critical Load on Quadrilateral and Circular Hollow Pipes under Pure Bending and Pure Torsion

Article Preview

Abstract:

Instability is one of the factors causing damage and injury that results in permanent disability. To increase the stable load-carrying capacity, a simplified and efficient computational method for determining the first critical load is necessary for the structure's structural design, application and safety. This study aims to determine the characteristics of the critical bending moment Mbcr and the critical torsion moment MTcr due to geometric size variations in the square, diamond, and circle cross-sectional hollow pipes so that consideration of the selection of hollow pipe size and cross-sectional shape is obtained under pure bending and pure torsion to minimize the occurrence of instability of the structure. The geometric size variation is carried out by changing the value of a/t in the quadrilateral pipe, the value of D/t in the circular pipe, and the length of the pipe L in each cross-sectional shape. This research was conducted using Finite Element Analysis-based software with linear and nonlinear buckling analyses. The moment load is given at the centre point of the model end, and the boundary conditions are set to see the deformation on the mid-span section of the pipe. The results showed that Mbcr and MTcr were inversely proportional to the values of a/t, D/t, and . The largest value of Mbcr belongs to the circular pipe. The value of Mbcr in the diamond pipe is greater than the square pipe but getting closer to the same as the value of L increases the MTcr value of both cross-sections is the same. The MTcr curve in the cross-section of the circle has a higher degree of steepness than the square and diamond cross-section. At the same value, the more the value of a/t and D/t increases thickness change has more compared to the circular pipe. At the same L, the greater the value of a/t and D/t, the difference in the Mbcr between the cross-section of the circle and the quadrilateral is smaller, but the difference in MTcr tends to be the same. At the same value of a/t and D/t, the oval deformation value and angle of twist will get bigger, but the Mbcr and MTcr values are getting smaller and will be constant at a given pipe length.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

21-35

Citation:

Online since:

June 2023

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2023 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Alansari, T.-H. Nguyen, Preliminary Study of Risk Factors in Marine Construction Projects in Saudi Arabia, International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research. 47 (2019) 99–116.

Google Scholar

[2] S. Chandrasekaran and A. K. Jain, Ocean structures : construction, materials, and operations., FL: CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2017.

Google Scholar

[3] G. Vukelić, and G. Vizentin, Common Case Studies of Marine Structural Failures, in Failure Analysis and Prevention, IntechOpen, London. (2017)

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.72789

Google Scholar

[4] Z. Qi, X. Kong, and G. Wang, Identifying Critical Loads of Frame Structures with Equilibrium Equations in Rate Form, Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2015 (2015) 1–17.

DOI: 10.1155/2015/325969

Google Scholar

[5] J. Wardenier, Hollow Sections in Structural Applications 2nd ed. Geneva Zoetermeer, CIDECT, Bouwen met Staal, 2010.

Google Scholar

[6] Y.-L. Li, X.-L. Zhao, Experimental study on stainless steel blind bolted T-stub to square hollow section connections, Thin-Walled Structures. 167 (2021) 108259.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2021.108259

Google Scholar

[7] H. Yudo, W. Amiruddin, and S. Jokosisworo, Analysis of the buckling moment on rectangular hollow pipe under pure bending load, MATEC Web of Conferences.177 (2018) 1012.

DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201817701012

Google Scholar

[8] H. Yudo and T. Yoshikawa, Buckling phenomenon for straight and curved pipe under pure bending, Journal of Marine Science and Technology. 20 (2015) 94–103.

DOI: 10.1007/s00773-014-0254-5

Google Scholar

[9] A. K. Ary, Y. Sanjaya, A. R. Prabowo, F. Imaduddin, N. A. B. Nordin, I. Istanto, and J. H. Cho, Numerical estimation of the torsional stiffness characteristics on urban Shell Eco-Marathon (SEM) vehicle design, Curved Layer Structure. 8 (2021) 167–180.

DOI: 10.1515/cls-2021-0016

Google Scholar

[10] D. J. Ridley-Ellis, J. S. Owen, and G. Davies, Torsional behaviour of rectangular hollow sections, J. Constr. Steel Res., 59 (2003) 641–663.

DOI: 10.1016/s0143-974x(02)00060-3

Google Scholar

[11] A. S. Tais and M. B. Abdulrahman, The effect of a circular hollow core on the torsional response of reinforced concrete beams subjected to repeated loading, Eurasian Journal of Engineering and Technology. 11 (2022) 86-101.

Google Scholar

[12] J. Ardianto, Eigenvalue Linear Buckling Optimization Of Modified Open Web Steel Joist, Jurnal Teknik Sipil. 14 (2019) 203–207.

DOI: 10.24002/jts.v14i4.1995

Google Scholar

[13] A. M. Baru, An Investigation of Buckling Phenomenon in Steel Elements, B.Eng. (Hons) thesis Civil Eng., Heriot Watt Univ., Dubai, 2017.

Google Scholar

[14] M. Mohsen, A. Abbas, and A. Saadoon, Effect of Loading Level and Span Length on Critical Buckling Load, Basrah Journal for Engineering Sciences. 16 (2016) 15–21.

DOI: 10.33971/bjes.16.1.3

Google Scholar

[15] S. Novoselac, T. Ergić, and P. Baličević, Linear and Nonlinear Buckling and Post Buckling Analysis of a Bar With the Influence of Imperfections. Teh. Vjesn., 19 (2012) 695–701.

Google Scholar

[16] F. P. Beer, E. R. Johnston, and J. T. Dewolf, Mechanics Of Materials, fourth ed., McGraw-Hill publication, Singapore, 2006.

Google Scholar