Laboratory Testing and Numerical Analysis on Reinforced Concrete Frames with Prefabricated Cellular Lightweight Concrete (CLC)

Article Preview

Abstract:

In general, buildings can be classified into Engineering buildings and Non-engineering buildings. Non-engineering building is a simple building such as a residential house that does not carry out structural calculations. Non-engineering buildings are very susceptible to lateral loads such as earthquakes which can cause collapse. Therefore, research is carried out in the form of laboratory tests and numerical tests for reinforced concrete frames filled with prefabricated cellular lightweight concrete (CLC). In this study, two specimens were used, namely an empty frame and a reinforced concrete frame filled with prefabricated CLC. In the laboratory test, it was analyzed by means of a cyclic load test, while in the numerical test the first specimen was made an open frame model and the second infill wall was made as an equivalent diagonal strut. Both of these models were analyzed using the SAP 2000 application version 22 by applying pushovers. The results showed that there were differences in laboratory tests and numerical tests. Therefore, a correction value for the numerical test results is needed to approach the value of the numerical test results.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

37-43

Citation:

Online since:

June 2023

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2023 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Mansur, M., Tjaronge, M.W., Irmawaty, R., & Amiruddin, A.A. (2022). Performance of prefabricated foam concrete as infilled wall under cyclic lateral loading. International Journal of Engineering Transactions B: Applications, 25(2), 337-343

DOI: 10.5829/ije.2022.35.02b.09

Google Scholar

[2] Tumpu, M., Parung, H., Tjaronge, M.W., & Amiruddin, A.A. (2021). Failure Pattern of Prefabricated Foam Concrete as Infill Wall Under In-Plane Lateral Loading.

Google Scholar

[3] Boen, T. (2010). Retrofitting simple buildings damaged by earthquakes. World Seismic Safety Initiative, Singapore.

Google Scholar

[4] Bhosale, A., Zade, N. P., Sarkar, P., & Davis, R. (2020). Mechanical and physical properties of cellular lightweight concrete block masonry. Construction and Building Materials, 248, 118621.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118621

Google Scholar

[5] Sunarno, Y., Tjaronge, M. W., & Irmawaty, R. (2020). Preliminary study on early compressive strength of foam concrete using Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) and Portland Composite Cement (PCC). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 419(1), 12033.

DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/419/1/012033

Google Scholar

[6] ASTM E2126-11. Standard Test Methods for Cyclic (Reversed) Load Test for Shear Resistance of Vertical Elements of the Lateral Force Resisting Systems for Buildings. ASTM International, Philadelphia, PE.

DOI: 10.1520/e2126-09

Google Scholar

[7] SNI 1726:2019. Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung dan Non gedung (in Indonesian).

DOI: 10.25139/jprs.v1i1.799

Google Scholar

[8] Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA-356. Prestandard and commentary for seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington (DC); 2000.

Google Scholar