Study of the Properties of CR-39 Polymer Irradiated with Alpha Particles with Different Energies at Different Etching Times

Article Preview

Abstract:

The track etch detector, CR-39, in common use is the most sensitive to recording charged particles. The CR-39 polymer samples were irradiated with alpha particle at different energies (2.17 MeV and 3.95 MeV) and fixed fluence followed by chemical etching with different times (1.50, 3.00 and 6.00 hrs). The formed tracks in CR-39 due to irradiations were visualized by using etching technique. The optical properties of CR-39 polymer after etching processes were studied with ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectroscopy. Moreover, the optical band gap energy was calculated for the different etching times (1.50, 3.00 and 6.00 hrs). The average value of the track diameter of irradiation at 2.17 MeV and etching time 1.5 hr is fairly large compared with its value at 3.95 MeV. This is due to the production of defect levels in the band gap of polymer at the 2.17 MeV. The virgin and 2.17 MeV samples at 3.00 and 6.00 hrs have the same optical behavior resulted in the etching solution at those etching times has reached the end of the alpha particle path and progress in all the directions in the bulk of CR-39 with the same rate.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

95-105

Citation:

Online since:

October 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Fleischer, R.L., Price, P. B. and Walker, R. M. (1975). Nuclear Tracks in Solids, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp.159-590.

Google Scholar

[2] Atul Kulkarni, A., Vyas, C. K., Kim, H., Kalsi, P. C., Kim, T., Manchanda, V. (2012) Sensors and Actuators, B161, 697.

Google Scholar

[3] Michael F. L'Annunziata, (2012). Handbook of radioactivity analysis, third edition, Elsevier Inc, pp.241-248.

Google Scholar

[4] El-Farrash, A. H., Yousef, H. A. and Hafez A.F. (2012). Radiation Measurements 47, 644.

Google Scholar

[5] Ismail, A. H. (2009). Nucl. Instrm. and Methods in Physics Research B 267, 3209.

Google Scholar

[6] Brahimi, S., Lounis-Mokrani, Z., Imatoukene, D., Badreddine, A., Abdelaziz, F.Z. and Allab, M. (2008). Radiation Measurements 43, S56.

DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2008.03.075

Google Scholar

[7] Eissa, M. F. (2008). International Journal of polymeric materials 57, 288.

Google Scholar

[8] Singh, S. and Neerja, (2007). Radiation Measurements 42, 1507.

Google Scholar

[9] Yamauchi, T. (2003). Radiation Measurements 36, 73.

Google Scholar

[10] Lounis, Z., Djeffal, S., Morsli, K. and Allab, M. (2001). Nucl. Instrm. and Methods in Physics Research B 179, 543.

Google Scholar

[11] Chong, C. S., Chan, M. A. C. and Tan, L.F. (1993). Nucl. Tracks Radiation Measurements 22, 101.

Google Scholar

[12] Schweikani, R., Durrani, S. A. and Tsuruta, T. (1993). Nucl. Tracks Radiation Measurements 22, 153.

Google Scholar

[13] Chong, C. S., Ishak, I., Mahat, R. H. and Amin, Y. M. (1997). Radiation Measurements 28, 119.

Google Scholar

[14] Nikezic, D. and Yu, K. N. (2004). Materials Science and Engineering R46, 51.

Google Scholar

[15] Durrani, S.A. and Bull, R. K. (1987). Nuclear Track Detection: Principles, Methods and Applications, Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp.52-54.

Google Scholar

[16] Ramola, R.C., Chandra, S., Negi, A., Rana, J. M. S., Annapoorni, S., Sonkawade, R. G., Kulriya, P. K. and Srivastava, A. (2009). Physica B 404, 26.

DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2008.09.033

Google Scholar

[17] Zaki, M.F. (2008). J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41, 175404.

Google Scholar

[18] Singh, S. and Prasher, S. (2005). Radiation Measurements 40, 50.

Google Scholar

[19] Phukan, T., Kanjilal, D., Goswami, T.D. and Das, H.L. (2003). Radiation Measurements, 36, 611.

Google Scholar

[20] Virk, H. S. and Srivastava, A. K. (2001). Radiation Measurements 34, 65.

Google Scholar

[21] Enge, W.(1980). Nuclear track 4, 283.

Google Scholar

[22] Kocsis, Zs., Dwivedi, K.K. and Brandt, R. (1997). Radiation Measurements 28,177.

Google Scholar

[23] Khayrat, A.H. and Durrani, S.A. ( 2003). Radiation Measurements 30, 15.

Google Scholar

[24] Ziegler, J. F., SRIM-2013, www.SRIM2013.org

Google Scholar

[25] Nikezic, D. and Yu, K. N. (2006). Computer Phys. Communications 174, 160.

Google Scholar

[26] Kumar, R., Rajguru, S. and Das, D., Prasad, R. (2003). Radiation Measurements 36, 151.

Google Scholar

[27] Gaffar, M. A. and Abu El-Fadl. (1999). Crystal research technology 34(7), 915.

Google Scholar

[28] Urbach, F. (1953). Phys. Rev. 92, 1324.

Google Scholar

[29] Singh, S., Prasher, S. (2006). Nucl. Instrm. and Methods in Physics Research B, 244, 252.

Google Scholar

[30] Fleischer, R. L., Price, P. B. and Woods, R. T. (1969). Phys. Rev. 188(2), 563.

Google Scholar