Mine Gas Flow in the Porous Massif and CFD Tool

Article Preview

Abstract:

There is a still dangerous effect in the form of methane leakage from coal seams in areas where mining activity still continuing or took place in the past. The issue of mining gas flow is still a matter that is necessary to pay attention and try to find new ways to solve this set of phenomena, no matter if it is the mining corridors or the flow in the rock massif. The number of measures to gradually reduce risk has been taken to protect the population. Nevertheless, the current situation is generally rated as serious as those risks still remain valid. Leakage of mine gases depend on many natural and technical mining conditions. With the closure of mines and thus the end of the ventilation situation considerably worse. This paper deals with the flow of dangerous mine gas, methane, through the rock mass using numerical flow modeling using CFD program Fluent. Using CFD codes can gain insight on the phenomenon under review and the results to take appropriate measures in the form of active or passive intervention.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

38-46

Citation:

Online since:

April 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] P. Bujok: Underground Hydraulics I. Scriptum VŠB-TUO. (1988).

Google Scholar

[2] D. Tiab, E. C. Donaldson: Petrophysics 2nd ed.: Theory and Practice of Measuring Reservoir Rock and Fluid Transport Properties. Boston, Gulf Professional Pub. 2004. XXVI. 889 p. ISBN 978-0-7506-7711-0.

Google Scholar

[3] L.W. Lake, J.R. Fanchi: Petroleum Engineering Handbook 2nd ed.: Theory and Practice of Measuring Reservoir Rock and Fluid Transport Properties TX: Society of Petroleum Engineers. 2006-2007. 7 v. in 8 v. ISBN 155563124X7.

Google Scholar

[4] O. Torsæter, M. Abtahi: Experimental Reservoir Engineering Laboratory Workbook. Norwegian University of Science and Technology. (2003).

Google Scholar

[5] H.A. Nooruddin, M.E. Hossain: Modified Kozeny–Carmen correlation for enhanced hydraulic flow unit characterization. Elsevier. 2011. DOI: 10. 1016/j. petrol. 2011. 11. 003.

DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2011.11.003

Google Scholar

[6] AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE: Recommended Practices for Core Analysis, Recommended Practice 40 Second Edition, February 1998; Available from: <http: /w3. energistics. org/RP40/rp40. pdf>.

Google Scholar

[7] Gases – Explosive and Flammability Concentration Limits` Available from: <http: /www. engineeringtoolbox. com/explosive-concentration-limits-d_423. html>.

Google Scholar

[8] QIAN, X. -M., LIU, M., LIU, Z. -Y., SUN, W. -L.: Numerical simulation of methane leakage diffusion in the space with multi-buildings. (2009) Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (English Edition), 18 (4), pp.388-394.

Google Scholar

[9] KOUDELKOVA, J., BENOVA, E.: Risk assessment from the output of mine gases. (2012).

Google Scholar

[10] TANGUTURI, K., BALUSU, R.: CFD modeling of methane gas distribution and control strategies in a gassy coal mine. (2014) Journal of Computational Multiphase Flows, 6 (1), pp.65-78.

DOI: 10.1260/1757-482x.6.1.65

Google Scholar

[11] STAŠA, P., CHOVANCOVÁ, K., KEBO, V., CHOVANEC, J., KODYM, O.: Research of CO2 Storage Possibilities to the Underground; Procedia Earth and Planetary Science – Volume 6, 2013; pages: 14-23, ISSN: 1878-5220; DOI: 10. 1016/j. proeps. 2013. 01. 002.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeps.2013.01.002

Google Scholar

[12] STAŠA, P., KEBO, V., FUCHSÍKOVÁ, P., KUBÁČ, L.: Modelling potential action for building protection against flow of methane from the underground using the Fluent software; Proceedings of the 13th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC), High Tatras, Podbanské, Slovak Republic, 2012; IEEE Catalog number: CFP1242L-CDR; ISBN: 978-1-4577-1866-3.

DOI: 10.1109/carpathiancc.2012.6228732

Google Scholar

[13] KEBO, V., STAŠA, P., BENEŠ, F.: Application of CFD programs and supercomputing in mining. In Mine planning and equipment selection; proceedings of the 22nd MPES conference: Dresden, Germany, 14th–19th October 2013. London: Springer, 2013, s. 899-910.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-02678-7_87

Google Scholar