Corrosion Resistance of Vanadis 6 Steel after Conventional Heat Treatment and Sub-Zero Treatment in Cold Nitrogen Gas Followed by Tempering

Article Preview

Abstract:

The paper presents the results of study of corrosion resistance of Vanadis 6 steel after conventional heat treatment and sub-zero treatment at-140 °C for 17 h. It was found that sub-zero treatment leads generally to decrease in corrosion current, which is in turn reflected in lower corrosion rate of the material subjected to this kind of treatment. The corrosion potential of sub-zero treated specimens was more anodic, suggesting their more noble behavior in 3.5 % NaCl water solution. This behavior was ascribed to the presence of a huge number of small globular carbides in SZT specimens, which seemed to stabilize the protective oxide films on the surfaces. Tempering reduces the corrosion resistance of the steel since this treatment produces fine precipitates of alloyed carbides that deplete the matrix by chromium and thereby destabilizes the protective films on the steel surface.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

16-29

Citation:

Online since:

August 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. Ptačinová, V. Sedlická, M. Hudáková, I. Dlouhý, P. Jurči, Microstructure – Toughness relationships in sub-zero treated and tempered Vanadis 6 steel compared to conventional treatment, Materials Science & Engineering. A 702 (2017) 241-258.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.07.007

Google Scholar

[2] P. Jurči, M. Dománková, M. Hudáková, J. Ptačinová, M. Pašák, Characterization of microstructure and tempering response of conventionally quenched, short- and long-time sub-zero treated PM Vanadis 6 ledeburitic tool steel, Materials Characterization. 134 (2017) 398-415.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2017.10.029

Google Scholar

[3] P. Jurči, M. Dománková, L. Čaplovič, J. Ptačinová, J. Sobotová, P. Salabová, O. Prikner, B. Šuštaršič, D. Jenko, Microstructure and hardness of sub-zero treated and no tempered P/M Vanadis 6 ledeburitic tool steel, Vacuum. 111 (2015) 92-101.

DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2014.10.004

Google Scholar

[4] K. Amini, A. Akhbarizadeh, S. Javadpour, Effect of carbide distribution on corrosion behavior of the deep cryogenically treated 1.2080 steel, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance. 25 (2016) 365-373.

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-015-1858-6

Google Scholar

[5] J. Sobotova, P. Jurči, I. Dlouhy, The effect of subzero treatment on microstructure, fracture toughness, and wear resistance of Vanadis 6 tool steel, Materials Science & Engineering. A 652 (2016) 192-204.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.11.078

Google Scholar

[6] S. K. Bonagani, V. Bathula, V. Kain, Influence of tempering treatment on microstructure and pitting corrosion of 13 wt.% Cr martensitic stainless steel, Corrosion Science. 131 (2018) 340-354.

DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2017.12.012

Google Scholar

[7] J. Wan, Y. Lou, H. Ruan, The partition coefficient of alloying elements and its influence on the pitting corrosion resistance of 15Cr-2Ni duplex stainless steel, Corrosion Science. 139 (2018) 13-20.

DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2018.04.038

Google Scholar

[8] X. Cheng, Y. Wang, X. Li, C. Dong, Interaction between austein-ferrite phases on passive performance of 2205 duplex stainless steel, Journal of Materials Science & Technology. 34 (2018) 2140-2148.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2018.02.020

Google Scholar

[9] S. Lu, K. Yao, Y. Chen, M. Wang N. Chen, X. Ge, Effect of quenching and partitioning on the microstructure evolution and electrochemical properties of a martensitic stainless steel, Corrosion Science. 103 (2016) 95 – 104.

DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2015.11.010

Google Scholar

[10] ASTM G 102 – 89(2015)e1: Standard Practice for Calculation of Corrosion Rates and Related Information from Electrochemical Measurements, ASTM Book of Standards (2015).

Google Scholar

[11] J. Ďurica, P. Jurči, M. Kusý, J. Ptačinová, M. Sahul, M. Pašák, Microstructural evaluation of tool steel Vanadis 6 after sub-zero treatment at -140 °C without tempering, Manufacturing Technology. 18 (2018) 222 - 226.

DOI: 10.21062/ujep/81.2018/a/1213-2489/mt/18/2/222

Google Scholar

[12] D. Das, K.K. RAY, Structure – property correlation of sub-zero treated AISI D2 steel, Materials Science & Engineering. A 541 (2012) 45-60.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.01.130

Google Scholar

[13] M. Koneshlou, K. M. Asl, F. Khomamizadeh, Effect of cryogenic treatment on microstructure, mechanical and wear behaviors of AISI H13 hot work steel, Cryogenics. 51 (2011) 55-61.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2010.11.001

Google Scholar

[14] A. Akhbarizadeh, K. Amini, S. Javadpour, Effects of applying an external magnetic field during the deep cryogenic heat treatment on the corrosion resistance and wear behaviour of 1.2080 tool steel, Materials & Design. 41 (2012) 114 – 123.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.03.045

Google Scholar

[15] C.L. Briant, A. M.Ritter, The effect of cold work on the sensitization of 304 stainless steel, Scripta Metallurgica. 13 (1979) 177 – 181.

DOI: 10.1016/0036-9748(79)90288-6

Google Scholar

[16] J. Wu, B. Wang, Y. Zhang, R. Liu, Y. Xia, G. Li, W. Xue, Enhanced wear and corrosion resistance of plasma electrolytic carburized layer on T8 carbon steel, Materials Chemistry and Physics. 171 (2016) 50-56.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.09.047

Google Scholar