Application of Associated and Non-Associated Flow Metal Plasticity for F.S.S Sheet

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the last decade, several phenomenological yield criteria for anisotropic material has been proposed to improve the modeling predictions about sheet metal-forming processes. In regard to this engineering application, two proprieties of models have been used. If the yield function and the plastic potential are not same (not equal), the normality rule is non associative flow rule (NAFR), otherwise, when the stresses yield has been completely coupled to the anisotropic strain rate ratio (plastic potential), is called the associated flow rule (AFR). The non-associated flow rule is largely adopted to predict a plastic behavior for metal forming, accurately about à strong mechanical anisotropy presents in sheet metal forming processes. However, various studies described the limits of the AFR concept in dealing with highly anisotropic materials. In this study, the quadratic Hill1948 yield criteria is considered to predict mechanical behavior under AFR and NAFR approach. Experiment and modeling predictions behaviour of normalized anisotropic coefficient r (θ) and σ (θ) evolved with θ in sheet plane. and the equibiaxial yield stress σb was assumed σb=1 but the rb-values was computed from Yld96 [15].

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

473-480

Citation:

Online since:

January 2021

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R.P.R. Cardoso, O.B. Adetoro, A generalisation of the Hill's quadratic yield function for planar plastic anisotropy to consider loading direction, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 128–129 (2017) 253–268.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.04.024

Google Scholar

[2] O. Chahaoui, M. L. Fares, D. Piot, F. Montheillet, Monoclinic effects and orthotropic estimation for the behaviour of rolled sheet, Journal of Materials Science 46: (2011)1655-1667.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-010-4983-5

Google Scholar

[3] N. Brinis, B. Regaiguia, O. Chahaoui, N. Maatougui, M. L Fares, Modelling Mechanical Properties of AISI 439-430Ti Ferritic Stainless-Steel Sheet, Journal of Solid Mechanics Vol. 11, No. 2, (2019). pp.425-439.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.297.31

Google Scholar

[4] R. Hill, A theory of yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic materials. Proceedings: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Science, Royal Society London, A193 (1948) 281-297.

Google Scholar

[5] Monica Iordache1, Mihaela Teaca1, 2, Isabelle Charpentier2, Marion Martiny2, Gérard Ferron2 Identification of sheet metal plastic anisotropy, and optimization of initial blank shape in deep drawing' the annals of "dunărea de jos, university of galaţi fascicle v, technologies in machine building, ISSN (2009) 1221- 4566.

Google Scholar

[6] W.A Spitzig, R.J Sober, and O Richmond, Pressure dependence of yielding and associated volume expansion in tempered martensite, Acta Metallurgica, 23(7): (1975) 885 – 893.

DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(75)90205-9

Google Scholar

[7] W.A. Spitzig and O. Richmond, The effect of pressure on the flow stress of metals, Acta Metallurgica, 32(3):457 – 463, (1984).

DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(84)90119-6

Google Scholar

[8] T.B. Stoughton, A non-associated flow rule for sheet metal forming, International Journal of Plasticity, 18(5–6): (2002) 687–714.

DOI: 10.1016/s0749-6419(01)00053-5

Google Scholar

[9] M. Safaei, M. G., Lee, S. L. Zang, and W. D. Waele, An evolutionary anisotropic model for sheet metals based on non-associated flow approach, Comput. Mater. Sci. (2014) 81, 15-29.

DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.05.035

Google Scholar

[10] H. Aretz, Numerical analysis of diffuse and localized necking in orthotropic sheet metals, International Journal of Plasticity 23 (2007) 798–840.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.07.005

Google Scholar

[11] O. Cazacu, F. Barlat, Generalization of Drucker's yield criterion to orthotropy, Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids 6 (2001) 613–630.

DOI: 10.1177/108128650100600603

Google Scholar

[12] M. Kawka, A. Makinouchi, Plastic anisotropy in FEM analysis using degenerated solid element, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 60 (1996) 239–242.

DOI: 10.1016/0924-0136(96)02336-9

Google Scholar

[13] O. Chahaoui, M.L. fares, D. Piot, F. Montheillet, Mechanical Modeling of the Macroscopic Behavior for Anisotropic and Heterogeneous Alloys, Metals and Materials International. Vol. 19, No. 5 (2013), p.1005~1019.

DOI: 10.1007/s12540-013-5013-3

Google Scholar

[14] N. Brinis, B. Regaiguia, O. Chahaoui, N. Maatougui, M. L Fares, Modelling Mechanical Properties of AISI 439-430Ti Ferritic Stainless-Steel Sheet, Journal of Solid Mechanics Vol. 11, No. 2, (2019) pp.425-439.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.297.31

Google Scholar

[15] F Barlat, R.C Becker, T. Hayashida,Y. Maeda, M. Yanagawa, K. Chung, J.C Brem, D.J Lege, K Matsui., S.J. Murtha, S Hattori., Yielding description of solution strengthened aluminium alloys,   International Journal of Plasticity 13: ,(1997) 185–401.

DOI: 10.1016/s0749-6419(97)80005-8

Google Scholar