Numerical Modeling of Pure and Metal-Foam Loaded PCMs

Article Preview

Abstract:

Despite many desirable properties, most phase change materials (PCMs) undergo timing issues during the phase change process due to a low thermal conductivity, which limits their application in heat storages. Thus, many techniques have been pointed out to overcome these disadvantages and improve heat transfer, such as coupling PCMs with metal inserts, like high porosity open-cell metal foams. Indeed, the presence of a metal foam increases the effective thermal conductivity of the composite medium and speeds up the charging and discharging phases. In the present paper, a numerical model developed in COMSOL ambient has been calibrated by comparison with experimental results on the melting of pure and metal-foam loaded PCMs, placed in a small case and heated from the top by an electric resistance. The numerical model considers the metal foam as a static solid, filled with a phase changing fluid and employs a literature correlation to evaluate the effective thermal conductivity of the composite medium. The performance of two different paraffinic PCMs (RT35 and RT35HC by Rubitherm GmbH, D), loaded either with a copper foam (20 PPI, 95% porosity, by Porometal, China) or with an aluminum one (10 PPI, 96% porosity, by Recemat, NL) has been investigated in terms of speed rate of the phase change front, time required to complete the melting process, temperature distribution and effect of foam porosity. The obtained results clearly evidence the significant heat transfer improvement yielded by metal foams, whose presence increases the effective thermal conductivity of the composite medium (from 0.2 to 7.03 W/mK for copper foam and to 3.52 W/mK for aluminum one), leading to a significant decrease of the charging time and to a lower temperature gradient within the PCM (from about 16 to 3 K).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

231-241

Citation:

Online since:

November 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Dongellini, C. Naldi, C. Moser, S. Varga, G.L. Morini, Primary energy saving potential of a solar-driven ejector cooling system: a case study for a Portuguese residential building, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2116 (2021) 012117.

DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/2116/1/012117

Google Scholar

[2] R. Zeinelabdein, S. Omer, G. Gan, Critical review of latent heat storage systems for free cooling in buildings, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 82 (2018) 2843–2868.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.046

Google Scholar

[3] M.M. El Idi, M. Karkri, Heating and cooling conditions effects on the kinetic of phase change of PCM embedded in metal foam, Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 21 (2020), 100716.

DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2020.100716

Google Scholar

[4] H. Xu, Y. Wang, X. Han, Analytical considerations of thermal storage and interface evolution of a PCM with/without porous media, Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Flow 30 (2020) 373–400.

DOI: 10.1108/hff-02-2019-0094

Google Scholar

[5] N. Bianco, S. Busiello, M. Iasiello, G.M. Mauro, Finned heat sinks with phase change materials and metal foams: Pareto optimization to address cost and operation time, Appl. Therm. Eng. 197 (2021), 117436.

DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117436

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Khattari, T. El Rhafiki, N. Choab, T. Kousksou, M. Alaphilippe, Y. Zeraouli, Apparent heat capacity method to investigate heat transfer in a composite phase change material, J. Energy Storage 28 (2020), 101239.

DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2020.101239

Google Scholar

[7] M. Iten, S. Liu, A. Shukla, Experimental validation of an air-PCM storage unit comparing the effective heat capacity and enthalpy methods through CFD simulations, Energy 155 (2018) 495–503.

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.128

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Khattari, T. El Rhafiki, N. Choab, T. Kousksou, M. Alaphilippe, Y. Zeraouli, Apparent heat capacity method to investigate heat transfer in a composite phase change material, J. Energy Storage 28 (2020), 101239.

DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2020.101239

Google Scholar

[9] A. Caggiano, C. Mankel, E. Koenders, Reviewing theoretical and numerical models for PCM-embedded cementitious composites, Buildings 9 (2019) 3.

DOI: 10.3390/buildings9010003

Google Scholar

[10] A.S. Fleischer, Thermal Energy Storage Using Phase Change Materials – Fundamentals and Applications, Springer, Minneapolis, (2015).

Google Scholar

[11] A. Bhattacharya, V.V. Calmidi, R.L. Mahajan, Thermophysical properties of high porosity metal foams, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 45 (2002) 1017–1031.

DOI: 10.1016/s0017-9310(01)00220-4

Google Scholar

[12] C. Naldi, M. Dongellini, G.L. Morini, The evaluation of the effective thermal conductivity of metal-foam loaded phase change materials, J. Energy Storage 51 (2022), 104450.

DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2022.104450

Google Scholar

[13] COMSOL Multiphysics, Heat transfer module user's guide. Information on https://doc.comsol.com/.

Google Scholar