Numerical Multiphysics CFD Modelling of Porosity Evolution in Thermoset Prepreg Microstructures

Article Preview

Abstract:

Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers (CFRPs) are essential to the aerospace industry, offering superior strength-to-weight ratios. Currently, the manufacturing of primary structures via standard autoclave curing is a robust, mastered process that successfully minimizes defects, keeping porosity levels below critical thresholds (typically < 1 %). Consequently, porosity is generally not considered as an issue in standard, optimized production lines.However, this stability may be affected by emerging industrial paradigms aimed at increasing production rates and reducing costs. The shift toward accelerated manufacturing – characterized by rapid heating rates, shortened cure cycles and by new manufacturing processes – and the introduction of complex material architectures risk re-introducing significant porosity. In parallel, there is currently no numerical model capable of accurately predicting porosity formation and evolution under these complex conditions. Existing simulation approaches are typically macroscopic and rely on homogenized porous media assumptions, failing to capture the essential micro-scale interactions between bubbles and fibres.To address this gap, this study presents an extended, custom multi-physics Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) solver built upon an existing OpenFOAM framework. The goal is to provide the first predictive tool for void evolution within realistic microstructures. The numerical framework couples a two-phase compressible flow model with the complete thermo-chemo-rheological physics of thermoset curing.The solver is applied to 2D Representative Volume Elements (RVEs) of a prepreg ply. Simulations of a standard autoclave cycle demonstrated the solver's ability to capture micro-scale dynamics, showing how voids are compressed and transported during the resin viscosity drop before being frozen at gelation. A parametric study comparing 3-bars and 7-bars pressures confirmed the model's physical ability in predicting void volume reduction.While currently focused on mechanical compression, the tool is designed to support the development of future manufacturing cycles. Future work will incorporate moisture diffusion physics and includes experimental validation via X-ray micro-tomography and in-situ synchrotron monitoring.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1-10

Citation:

Online since:

April 2026

Export:

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Mehdikhani, L. Gorbatikh, I. Verpoest, S. V. Lomov, Voids in fiber-reinforced polymer composites: A review on their formation, characteristics, and effects on mechanical performance, J. Compos. Mater. 53 (2018) 1579–1669.

DOI: 10.1177/0021998318772152

Google Scholar

[2] W. Hu, L. Grunenfelder, T. Centea, S. Nutt, In situ monitoring and analysis of void evolution in unidirectional prepreg, J. Compos. Mater. 52 (2018) 1–14.

DOI: 10.1177/0021998318759183

Google Scholar

[3] J.J. Torres, M. Simmons, F. Sket, C. González, An analysis of void formation mechanisms in out-of-autoclave prepregs by means of X-ray computed tomography, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 117 (2019) 230–242.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.11.010

Google Scholar

[4] N.N. Kermani, P. Simacek, S. G. Advani, Porosity predictions during co-cure of honeycomb core prepreg sandwich structures, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 132 (2020) 105824.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105824

Google Scholar

[5] B. de Parscau du Plessix, S. le Corre, F. Jacquemin, P. Lefebure, V. Sobotka, Improved simplified approach for the prediction of porosity growth during the curing of composite parts, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 90 (2016) 549–558.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.024

Google Scholar

[6] S. Sourour, M. R. Kamal, Differential scanning calorimetry of epoxy cure: isothermal cure kinetics, Thermochim. Acta 14 (1–2) (1976) 41–59.

DOI: 10.1016/0040-6031(76)80056-1

Google Scholar

[7] M.L. Williams, R. F. Landel, J. D. Ferry, The temperature dependence of relaxation mechanisms in amorphous polymers and other glass-forming liquids, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77 (1955) 3701–3707.

DOI: 10.1021/ja01619a008

Google Scholar

[8] J.M. Castro, C. W. Macosko, Kinetics and rheology of typical polyurethane reaction injection molding systems, Soc. Plast. Eng. Tech. Pap. Annu. Tech. Conf. 38 (1980) 434–438.

Google Scholar

[9] C. Greenshields, H. Weller, Notes on Computational Fluid Dynamics: General Principles, CFD Direct Ltd, Reading, UK, 2022.

Google Scholar

[10] L.K. Grunenfelder, S. R. Nutt, Void formation in composite prepregs—Effect of dissolved moisture, Compos. Sci. Technol. 70 (16) (2010) 2304–2309.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.09.009

Google Scholar