Interfacial Welding of Two Different Reinforced Thermoplastics via TACOMA

Article Preview

Abstract:

Thermoplastic composites offer new opportunities for multifunctional lightweight structures through their ability to be joined by fusion welding. However, the welding of dissimilar thermoplastic composites remains challenging due to asymmetric melting behavior and heterogeneous reinforcement architectures, all of which influence interfacial quality and mechanical performance. Within the CONNECT project, this study focuses on the adhesion development between a short carbon fiber reinforced PEEK and a continuous carbon fiber reinforced LM-PAEK laminate. Welding was performed using the TACOMA platform, which allows precisely controlled and asymmetric conductive heating cycles. The influence of welding temperature and contact time on interface formation was examined through Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) tests under Mode I loading, complemented by surface topography and scanning electron microscopy. Results show that welding at 350 °C significantly enhances interfacial fracture toughness compared to 345 °C, reflecting increased chain mobility of the PEEK matrix while the LM-PAEK phase is already molten. However, prolonged contact times lead to reorientation of short fibers parallel to the interface within the molten PEEK suppressing fiber bridging mechanisms at the interface and reducing the resistance to crack initiation, resulting in lower measured GIC values. These findings provide new mechanistic insight into the welding of dissimilar PAEK-based composites and identify a narrow processing window in which asymmetric melting and reinforcement morphology jointly govern interfacial performance. The interfacial fracture toughness was evaluated using a mode I initiation energy approach, selected due to unstable crack propagation in this bi-material configuration.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

35-44

Citation:

Online since:

April 2026

Export:

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. Audoit, L. Rivière, J. Dandurand, A. Lonjon, E. Dantras, C. Lacabanne, Thermal mechanical and dielectric behavior of poly (aryl ether ketone) with low melting temperature, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 135(4) (2019) 2147–2157.

DOI: 10.1007/s10973-018-7292-x

Google Scholar

[2] L. B. Nohara, M. L. Costa, M. A. Alves, M. F. K. Takahashi, E. L. Nohara, M. C. Rezende, Processing of high-performance composites based on PEEK by aqueous suspension prepregging, Materials Research, 13 (2010) 245–252.

DOI: 10.1590/s1516-14392010000200020

Google Scholar

[3] J.P. Reis, M.F.S.F. de Moura, Mixed-mode I+II fracture behaviour of thermoplastic composites and their adhesive bonded joints, Composites Science and Technology, 271 (2025)111349.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2025.111349

Google Scholar

[4] J. Avenet, T. A. Cender, S. Le Corre, J.-L. Bailleul, A. Levy, Experimental correlation of rheological relaxation and interface healing times in welding thermoplastic PEKK composites. Composites Part A, 149 (2021) 106489.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106489

Google Scholar

[5] J.-N. Dai, S.-Q. Kou, High-content continuous carbon fibers reinforced PEEK matrix composite with ultra-high mechanical and wear performance at elevated temperature, Composite Structures, 295 (2022) 115837.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115837

Google Scholar

[6] W. Zhao, R. Yu, W. Dong, J. Luan, G. Wang, H. Zhang, et al., The influence of long carbon fiber and its orientation on the properties of three-dimensional needle-punched CF/PEEK composites, Composites Science and Technology, 203 (2021) 108565.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108565

Google Scholar

[7] P. Wang, B. Zou, S. Ding, C. Huang, Z. Shi, Y. Ma, et al., Preparation of short CF/GF reinforced PEEK composite filaments and their comprehensive properties evaluation for FDM-3D printing. Composites Part B: Engineering, 198 (2020) 108175.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108175

Google Scholar

[8] W. I. Lee, G. S. Springer, A Model of the Manufacturing Process of Thermoplastic Matrix Composites. Journal of Composite Materials, 21(11) (1987) 1017–1055.

DOI: 10.1177/002199838702101103

Google Scholar

[9] C. Ageorges, L. Ye, M. Hou, Advances in fusion bonding techniques for joining thermoplastic matrix composites: A review. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 32(6) (2001) 839–857.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-835x(00)00166-4

Google Scholar

[10] J. Avenet, A. Levy, J.-L. Bailleul, S. Le Corre , J. Delmas, Adhesion of high-performance thermoplastic composites: Development of a bench and procedure for kinetics identification, Composites Part A 138 (2020) 106054.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106054

Google Scholar

[11] S. Samborski, A. Gliszczynski, J. Rzeczkowski, N. Wiacek, Mode I Interlaminar Fracture of Glass/Epoxy Unidirectional Laminates. Part I: Experimental Studies. Materials 12 (2019) 1607.

DOI: 10.3390/ma12101607

Google Scholar