Drying Kinetics Evaluation of Solid Red Bricks

Article Preview

Abstract:

Moisture is one of the most deteriorating factors of buildings. The moisture content depends on hygroscopic equilibrium between buildings materials and environment, which is determined by the drying and wetting rate of masonry. So, the moisture content is not only determined by the water that is absorbed by the material, but also by the amount of water that is evaporated under favourable conditions, which is described by the drying process.This work presents the results of an experimental evaluation of the drying kinetics of solid red brick, considering the bulk moisture transfer. The drying kinetics was assessed considering different environment conditions (air temperature and humidity). The experimental results showed that the drying flux is extremely dependent of temperature and relative humidity in the first stage of the drying process. The values obtained were between 0.025 kg/m2h (T=15oC and RH=80%) and 0.135 kg/m2h (T=30oC and RH=50%), for the worst and better drying ambient conditions.Different first-order kinetics models, available in the literature, were adjusted to describe the drying process and estimate the equilibrium moisture content of the samples. The results point that Midilli et al. model allows the best fit and that the drying time constant is strongly affected by the drying air conditions. It was also estimated the apparent molecular diffusion coefficient for solid red brick samples and its variation with temperature.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

119-134

Citation:

Online since:

February 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] E. Barreira, J.M.P.Q. Delgado and V.P. de Freitas: Wetting and Drying of Building Materials, Drying and Wetting of Building Materials and Components, Chap. 3, 51–69, edited by J.M.P.Q. Delgado, Book Series: Building Pathology and Rehabilitation - Vol. 4, Springer, ISBN: 978-3-319-04531-3 (2014).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-04531-3_3

Google Scholar

[2] T. Bednar: Approximation of Liquid Moisture Transport Coefficient of Porous Building Materials by Suction and Drying Experiments. Demands on Determination of Drying Curve (Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Building Physics in the Nordic Countries. Trondheim. Norway. p.493.

Google Scholar

[3] J. Crank: The mathematics of diffusion (Oxford Science. New York. 1975).

Google Scholar

[4] J.M.P.Q. Delgado. N.M.M. Ramos and V.P. de Freitas: Can moisture buffer performance be estimated from sorption kinetics? J. Building Physics, Vol. 29 (4): 281-299 (2006).

DOI: 10.1177/1744259106062568

Google Scholar

[5] L. Derdour. H. Desmorieux and J. Andrieu: A contribution to the characteristic drying curve concept: Application to the drying of plaster. Drying Technology, Vol. 18 (1): 237-260 (2000).

DOI: 10.1080/07373930008917702

Google Scholar

[6] V.P. de Freitas: Moisture Transfer in Building Walls, PhD Thesis, Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, Portugal, 1992 (in Portuguese).

Google Scholar

[7] V.P. de Freitas, V. Abrantes and P. Crausse: Moisture migration in building walls – Analysis of the interface phenomena. Building and Environment, Vol. 31(2): 99-108 (1996).

DOI: 10.1016/0360-1323(95)00027-5

Google Scholar

[8] C.L. Hii, C. L Law and M. Cloke: Modeling using a new thin layer drying model and product quality of cocoa. Journal of Food Engineering, Vol. 90: 191–198 (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.06.022

Google Scholar

[9] M. Karoglou, A. Moropoulou, Z.B. Maroulisa and M.K. Krokida: Drying Kinetics of Some Building Materials. Drying Technology, Vol. 23 (1-2): 305-315 (2005).

DOI: 10.1081/drt-200047926

Google Scholar

[10] M. Krus and A. Holm: Simple Methods to Approximate the Liquid Transport Coefficients Describing the Absorption and Drying Process (Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Building Physics in the Nordic Countries. Goteborg. Norway. p.241. 1999).

Google Scholar

[11] M. Planinic´, D. Velic´, S. Tomas, M. Bilic´ and A. Bucic: Modelling of drying and rehydration of carrots using Pelegs model. European Food Research Technology, Vol. 221: 445-451 (2005).

DOI: 10.1007/s00217-005-1200-x

Google Scholar

[12] Z.B. Maroulis and G.D. Saravacos: Food Process Design (Marcel Dekker, New York, USA. 2003).

Google Scholar

[13] H. Midilli, H. Kucuk and Z. Yapar: A New Model for Single-Layer Drying. Drying Technology, Vol. 20(7): 1503-1513(2002).

DOI: 10.1081/drt-120005864

Google Scholar

[14] M. Peleg: An empirical model for the description of moisture sorption curves. Journal of Food Science, Vol. 53: 1216–1219 (1988).

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1988.tb13565.x

Google Scholar

[15] I.T. Toğrul and D. Pehlivan: Modelling of drying kinetics of single apricot. Journal of Food Engineering, Vol. 58 (1): 23-32 (2003).

DOI: 10.1016/s0260-8774(02)00329-1

Google Scholar

[16] T.L. Thompson, R.M. Peart and G.H. Foster: Mathematical Simulation of Corn Drying­A New Model. Transactions of the ASAE, 11, 582-586 (1968).

Google Scholar

[17] M. Turhan, S. Sayar and S. Gunasekaran: Application of Peleg model to study water absorption in chickpea during soaking. Journal of Food Engineering, Vol. 53: 153-159 (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/s0260-8774(01)00152-2

Google Scholar

[18] A. Yagcıoglu, A. Degirmencioglu and F. Cagatay: Drying Characteristic of Laurel Leaves under Different Conditions (Proceedings of the 7th International Congress on Agricultural Mechanization and Energy. May 26-27. Adana. Turkey. 1999).

Google Scholar

[19] C.Y. Wang and R.P. Singh: Single Layer Drying Equation for RoughRice. ASAE Press, St. Joseph, MI, USA, (1978).

Google Scholar

[20] WUFI: WUFI Pro 5. 3 Fraunhofer – IBP, Holzkirchen, Germany (2014).

Google Scholar