Depolymerization of Cellulose Components from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunches in Bleaching and Delignification Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

Oil palm empty fruit bunches (OPEFB) are oil palm industry waste which is indeed abundant. OPEFB waste has been explorated to make fiber, cellulose, and its derivatives. In the process of extracting cellulose, there is depolymerization of several components, both hemicellulose, lignin, color, and structural elements. The combination of bleaching under acidic conditions and alkaline delignification gave different changes, one of which depends on the type of bleacher, concentration, reaction time, and the number of stages carried out. This study aimed to examine the effect of NaClO2 concentration and bleaching time on the physical and chemical characteristics that indicate the depolymerization process of OPEFB fiber. Depolymerization can be indicated by changes in the cellulose color, the content of cellulose, and the changes in cellulose crystallinity. The change of cellulose mass was affected by the bleacher concentration and the bleaching time. High concentrations of bleacher will reduce the cellulose mass significantly. Similarly, the depolymerization of the chromophore elements in OPEFB fiber will show a change in color from brown to gray-white with different brightness intensities. The XRD test indicated that there was a correlation between low crystallinity with the use of high bleacher concentrations.

You have full access to the following eBook
You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

41-49

Citation:

Online since:

August 2023

Export:

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S.H. Chang, An overview of empty fruit bunch from oil palm as feedstock for bio-oil production, Biomass and Bioenergy 62 (2014) 174–181.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.01.002

Google Scholar

[2] A.D. French, Glucose, not cellobiose, is the repeating unit of cellulose and why that is important, Cellulose 24 (2017), 4605–4609, 2017.

DOI: 10.1007/s10570-017-1450-3

Google Scholar

[3] B. Fei, R.A. Wach, H. Mitomo, F. Yoshii, T. Kume, Hydrogel of biodegradable cellulose derivatives. I. Radiation-induced crosslinking of CMC, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 78 (2000) 278–283.

DOI: 10.1002/1097-4628(20001010)78:2<278::aid-app60>3.0.co;2-9

Google Scholar

[4] F.N. Mohammad Padzil, S. H. Lee, Z. M. A. ari Ainun, C. H. Lee, L. C. Abdullah, Potential of oil palm empty fruit bunch resources in nanocellulose hydrogel production for versatile applications: A review, Materials 13 (2020).

DOI: 10.3390/ma13051245

Google Scholar

[5] R. Datta, Acidogenic fermentation of lignocellulose–acid yield and conversion of components, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 23 (1981) 2167–2170.

DOI: 10.1002/bit.260230921

Google Scholar

[6] L. Segal, J.J. Creely, A.E. Martin, C. M. Conrad, An Empirical Method for Estimating the Degree of Crystallinity of Native Cellulose Using the X-Ray Diffractometer, Text. Res. J. 29 (1959) 786–794.

DOI: 10.1177/004051755902901003

Google Scholar

[7] H. Kristanoko, F. Kusnandar, D. Herawati, Analisis warna berbasis smartphone android dan aplikasinya dalam pendugaan umur simpan konsentrat apel, agriTECH 41 (2021) 211.

DOI: 10.22146/agritech.52956

Google Scholar

[8] T. H. Kim, Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass, Bioprocess. Technol. Biorefinery Sustain. Prod. Fuels, Chem. Polym. (2013) 91–110.

Google Scholar

[9] O. Sevastyanova, J. Li, G. Geilerstedt, On the reaction mechanism of the thermal yellowing of bleached chemical pulps, Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J 21 (2006), 188–192.

DOI: 10.3183/npprj-2006-21-02-p188-192

Google Scholar

[10] A. Castellan S. Grelier, Color reversion of cellulosic and lignocellulosic fibers, Lignocellul. Fibers Wood Handb. Renew. Mater. Today's Environ. (2016) 531–551.

DOI: 10.1002/9781118773727.ch21

Google Scholar

[11] G. Gellerstedt, M. Pettersson, E. L. Lindfors, D. Robert, Reactions of lignin in chlorine dioxide bleaching of kraft pulps, Res. Chem. Intermed. 21 (1995) 441–456.

DOI: 10.1007/bf03052269

Google Scholar

[12] W. Farhat, R. A. Venditti, M. Hubbe, M. Taha, F. Becquart, and A. Ayoub, A review of water-resistant hemicellulose-based materials: processing and applications, ChemSusChem. 10 (2017), 305–323.

DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201601047

Google Scholar

[13] C. Chio, M. Sain, and W. Qin, Lignin utilization: A review of lignin depolymerization from various aspects, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 107 (2019), 232–249.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.008

Google Scholar

[14] S. K. Evans, O. N. Wesley, O. Nathan, and M. J. Moloto, Chemically purified cellulose and its nanocrystals from sugarcane baggase: isolation and characterization, Heliyon 10 (2019), p. e02635.

DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02635

Google Scholar

[15] C. J. Knill and J. F. Kennedy, Degradation of cellulose under alkaline conditions, Carbohydr. Polym. 51 (2002) 281–300.

Google Scholar

[16] S. Karagöz, T. Bhaskar, A. Muto, and Y. Sakata, Hydrothermal upgrading of biomass: Effect of K2CO3 concentration and biomass/water ratio on products distribution, Bioresour. Technol. 97 (2006) 90–98.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.02.051

Google Scholar

[17] S. Nam, A. D. French, B. D. Condon, and M. Concha, Segal crystallinity index revisited by the simulation of X-ray diffraction patterns of cotton cellulose Iβ and cellulose II, Carbohydr. Polym. 135 (2016) 1–9.

DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.035

Google Scholar

[18] P. Langan, Y. Nishiyama, and H. Chanzy, X-ray structure of mercerized cellulose II at 1 Å resolution, Biomacromolecules 2 (2001) 410–416.

DOI: 10.1021/bm005612q

Google Scholar