Maximizing High Value Light Products by Catalytic Cracking of VGO Produced by Iraqi Refinery over Formulated FCC Catalyst

Article Preview

Abstract:

Prototype of FCC catalyst were formulated by mixing the stabilised Y zeolites (68wt%) with polyvinal alcohol (PVA) (7%) as a solution binder and bentonite (25%). The Y zeolite including the original HY with Si/Al of 2.6 (cat.-2.6) and dealuminated HY with Si/Al of 30 (cat.-30) were used and tested for catalytic cracking of Iraqi vacuum gas oil (VGO) obtained from Al-Dura refinery using a pilot plant. The cracking process was carried out at a temperature of 520 °C and atmospheric pressure, The weight ratio of catalyst / oil ratio was 3 and 5. The results show that higher conversion of 77 wt. % and better product distribution (gasoline, kerosene and gas oil) could be obtained over cat.30 resulting to a good liquid product yield. The catalytic activity, in terms of VGO conversion was not affected over cat.-30 in spite of its lower acidity, suggesting the determinate of mesoporosity in the Y zeolite (cat.-30) catalysed cracking reactions. A higher yield of ~ 67 wt% to mid-distillates (i.e.Naphtha and kerosene) was as a result of the improvements in the diffusion to and from catalyst structure.

You have full access to the following eBook
You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

7-16

Citation:

Online since:

August 2023

Export:

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Wei, Y.; Parmentier, T. E.; de Jong, K. P.; Zecevic, J., Tailoring and visualizing the pore architecture of hierarchical zeolites. Chem Soc Rev 2015, 44 (20), 7234-61.

DOI: 10.1039/c5cs00155b

Google Scholar

[2] Usman, Abdulhafiz, et al. "Catalytic cracking of crude oil to light olefins and naphtha: Experimental and kinetic modeling." Chemical engineering research and design 120 (2017): 121-137

DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2017.01.027

Google Scholar

[3] Hashemi R, Nassar NN, Pereira Almao P. Nanoparticle technology for heavy oil in-situ upgrading and recovery enhancement: Opportunities and challenges. Appl Energy 2014; 133: 374–87.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.069

Google Scholar

[4] Fumoto E, Tago T, Masuda T. Production of lighter fuels by cracking petroleum residual oils with steam over zirconia-supporting iron oxide catalysts. Energy and Fuels 2006; 20: 1–6.

DOI: 10.1021/ef050105t

Google Scholar

[5] Box D, Wakeman T, Smith J. The end of cheap oil the consequences. Ecologist 2005; 35: 046.

Google Scholar

[6] Santos RG, Loh W, Bannwart AC, Trevisan O V. An overview of heavy oil properties and its recovery and transportation methods. Brazilian J Chem Eng 2014; 31: 571–90.

DOI: 10.1590/0104-6632.20140313s00001853

Google Scholar

[7] Meyer RF, Attanasi ED. Heavy oil and natural bitumen-strategic petroleum resources. United States Geol Surv 2003; 70-03: 1–6.

DOI: 10.3133/fs07003

Google Scholar

[8] Ibarra, Álvaro, et al. "A hybrid FCC/HZSM-5 catalyst for the catalytic cracking of a VGO/Bio-oil blend in FCC conditions." Catalysts 10.10 (2020): 1157.‏

DOI: 10.3390/catal10101157

Google Scholar

[9] Speight J. The Refinery of the Future. Burlington: Elsevier Science: Burlington, 2010.

Google Scholar

[10] Vermeiren W, Gilson J-P. Impact of Zeolites on the Petroleum and Petrochemical Industry. Top Catal 2009; 52: 1131–61.

DOI: 10.1007/s11244-009-9271-8

Google Scholar

[11] Robert A. Meyers. Handbook of Petroleum Refining Processes. New York: McGraw- Hill, 2004.

Google Scholar

[12] García, J.R., Fals, J., Dietta, L.E., & Sedran, U. (2022). VGO from shale oil. FCC processability and co-processing with conventional VGO. Fuel, 328, 125327.‏

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125327

Google Scholar

[13] Sonthisawate, T., et al., Catalytic cracking reaction of vacuum gas oil and atmospheric residue by zeolite-containing microporous and mesoporous composites using Curie point pyrolyzer. Fuel Processing Technology, 2016. 142: pp.337-344

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.10.016

Google Scholar

[14] FLANIGEN EM, KHATAMI H, SZYMANSKI HA. Infrared Structural Studies of Zeolite Frameworks. 1974: 201–29.

DOI: 10.1021/ba-1971-0101.ch016

Google Scholar

[15] Sing KSW. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984). Pure Appl Chem 1985; 57: 603–19.

DOI: 10.1351/pac198557040603

Google Scholar

[16] Husein MM, Alkhaldi SJ. In Situ Preparation of Alumina Nanoparticles in Heavy Oil and Their Thermal Cracking Performance. Energy & Fuels 2014; 28: 6563–9.

DOI: 10.1021/ef5012963

Google Scholar

[17] Corma A, Martínez C, Sauvanaud L. New materials as FCC active matrix components for maximizing diesel (light cycle oil, LCO) and minimizing its aromatic content. Catal Today 2007; 127: 3–16.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2007.03.056

Google Scholar

[18] Li, Kunhao and Valla, Julia and Garcia-Martinez J. Realizing the commercial potential of hierarchical zeolites: new opportunities in catalytic cracking. ChemCatChem 2014; 6: 46–66.

DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201300345

Google Scholar

[19] Zhai S, Zhang Y, Wu D, Sun Y, Wang S. Comparative study on the structural, acidic and catalytic properties of nano-sized and large-particulate mesoporous aluminosilicates. Top Catal 2006; 39: 227–35.

DOI: 10.1007/s11244-006-0061-2

Google Scholar

[20] Harding R., Peters A., Nee JR. New developments in FCC catalyst technology. Appl Catal

Google Scholar

[21] Marketing specifications guide of Iraqi petroleum products (2013)

Google Scholar