A Deeper Analysis of Using Single and Integrated Use of Enterprise Architecture Modeling Languages

Abstract:

Selecting the right modeling approach for Enterprise Architecture (EA) is pivotal for optimizing organizational effectiveness. This paper investigates the use of ArchiMate as a standalone tool versus its integration with UML and BPMN through comprehensive SWOT and SPACE analyses. The SWOT analysis highlights that ArchiMate’s strengths include its simplicity and ease of learning, which streamline user training and implementation. However, its limited scope may not suffice for more intricate scenarios, potentially leading to user dissatisfaction due to its narrower capabilities. Opportunities for improvement lie in leveraging ArchiMate's learnability and exploring hybrid approaches that combine its simplicity with the strengths of other languages. Threats include the growing complexity of enterprise environments and potential resistance from users accustomed to integrated systems. The SPACE analysis underscores ArchiMate's financial efficiency and specialized expertise, making it a valuable choice for less complex modeling needs. In contrast, the integrated approach offers a more robust solution for handling complex environments, providing a strategic advantage through enhanced versatility and detail. This integration supports more nuanced and detailed modeling, aligning better with sophisticated EA requirements. These findings equip organizations with insights to make informed decisions about whether to adopt ArchiMate exclusively or integrate it with UML and BPMN, ensuring alignment with their specific EA needs and strategic objectives.

• Periodical: Engineering Headway (Volume 27)
• Pages: 729-738
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-WUC3Ys
• Online since: October 2025
• Authors: Aisha Edna Alicia Sanyoto*
• Keywords: ArchiMate, Enterprise Architecture Modeling, SPACE Analysis, SWOT Analysis

References

[1] D. Van Leeuwen, H. Ter Doest, M. Lankhorst, A tool integration workbench for enterprise architecture - Integrating heterogeneous models and tools, ICEIS 2004 - Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems 6 (2004) 470-478.

DOI: 10.5220/0002610804700478

[2] P. Bernus, L. Nemes, G. Schmidt, Handbook on enterprise architecture, Springer, Berlin, 2003.

[3] A.E.A. Sanyoto, M.C. Saputra, I. Aknuranda, Analyzing the impact of UML, BPMN, and ArchiMate integration from user perspective, in: Proc. 2024 10th International Conference on Computing and Artificial Intelligence (ICCAI '24), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2024, pp.409-414.

DOI: 10.1145/3669754.3669817

[4] E. Gürel, SWOT analysis: A theoretical review, J. Int. Soc. Res. 10 (2017) 994-1006.

DOI: 10.17719/jisr.2017.1832

[5] S.M. Ghochani, F. Kazami, M.K. Alavije, Application of SPACE Matrix, Developing Country Studies 2 (2012) 50-59.

[6] The Open Group, ArchiMate® 3.1 Specification, Accessed Jun. 30, 2024. Available: https://publications.opengroup.org/architecture/archimate-3-1-specification

[7] Object Management Group, Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) Version 2.0, Accessed Jun. 30, 2024. Available: https://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/.

[8] C. Schalles, Usability evaluation of modeling languages: An empirical research study, vol. 9783658000, 2013.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-00051-6

[9] C. He, M. Ma, P. Wang, Extract interpretability-accuracy balanced rules from artificial neural networks: A review, Neurocomputing 387 (2020) 346-358.

DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2020.01.036

[10] D. Zhang, Y. Gong, The comparison of LightGBM and XGBoost coupling factor analysis and prediagnosis of acute liver failure, IEEE Access 8 (2020) 220990-221003.

DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3042848

[11] T. Vaulet, et al., Gradient boosted trees with individual explanations: An alternative to logistic regression for viability prediction in the first trimester of pregnancy, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 213 (2022) 106520.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106520

[12] Heart Disease- UCI Machine Learning Repository, Accessed Jun. 30, 2024. Available: https://archive.ics.uci.edu/dataset/45/heart+disease.

[13] Enhancing DoS Detection in SmartGrid: Leveraging ML Using PCA and Explainable AI | IEEE Conference Publication |IEEE Xplore, Accessed Jun. 30, 2024. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10534453.

[14] M. Bugaj, K. Wrobel, J. Iwaniec, Model explainability using SHAP values for LightGBM predictions, in: 2021 IEEE XVIIth International Conference on the Perspective Technologies and Methods in MEMS Design (MEMSTECH), 2021, pp.102-106.

DOI: 10.1109/MEMSTECH53091.2021.9468078

[15] C. Kahraman, I. Kaya, A fuzzy multicriteria methodology for selection among energy alternatives, Expert Syst. Appl. 37 (2010) 6270-6281.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.110

[16] Y. Wang, C. Wang, Evaluating enterprise architecture frameworks from a usability perspective, Enterp. Inf. Syst. 8 (2014) 463-488.

DOI: 10.1080/17517575.2013.776118

[17] A.Smirnov, L. Shilov, N. Chilov, Ontology-based data integration for enterprise knowledge management, IFIP Int. Fed. Inf. Process. 97 (2007)151-161.

[18] J. Debbabi, A. Lemay, F. Lang, Concepts and methods for verifying UML models, Springer, Berlin, 2010.