Photosynthetic Responses of Mangrove Plant (Rhizophora apiculata) to Elevated Atmospheric CO2 Concentration

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to choose tree species that are climate change-adaptive, this study looked into the photosynthetic characteristics of the mangrove plant R. apiculata in response to increased atmospheric CO2 concentration. The seedlings were cultivated for nearly three months in environment-controlled growth chambers with two CO2 concentration combinations: (i) 28oC + CO2 420±20 ppm (control) and (ii) 28oC + CO2 650±20 ppm (elevated). Reduced tree height and physiological characteristics, such as protein and nitrogen levels and chlorophyll, were seen in the seedlings under the increased treatment. Specifically, a significant decrease in chlorophyll that is directly linked to the carbon dioxide fixative reaction system was the outcome of the increased treatment. Under the increased treatment, varying degrees of loss in photosynthetic characteristics were observed. Furthermore, at higher CO2, there was a noticeable decrease in the characteristics of the CO2 fixative reaction system, including the triose phosphate utilization (TPU) limitation (33%) lower rate, the ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) regeneration rate (35%), and the Rubisco activity rate (33%). These findings imply that the reduced CO2 fixative reaction system, rather than the photochemical reaction system, may be responsible for the low level of photosynthetic capability. Keywords: Mangrove, Photosynthetic rates, Rubisco, Elevated CO2

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Engineering Headway (Volume 35)

Pages:

31-41

Citation:

Online since:

February 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] NASA, 2022: Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Mauna Loa daily May 2022.NOAA,https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/mlo.html.

Google Scholar

[2] Lal, R, 2020: Managing soils for negative feedback to climate change and positive impact on food and nutritional security. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2: 66(1):1-9.

DOI: 10.1080/00380768.2020.1718548

Google Scholar

[3] IPCC, 2018: In-depth Q&A: The IPCC's special report on climate change at 1.5oC. Carbon Brief,08.10.2018,https://www.carbonbrief.org/in-depth-qa-ipccs-special-report-on-climatechange-at-one point-five-c.

Google Scholar

[4] Kim, P. G., Lee, E. J., 2001c: Ecophysiology of photosynthesis 3: Photosynthetic responses to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration and temperature. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 3: 238-243

Google Scholar

[5] Tamimi, B., Wan Julaina, W. A., Nizam, M. S, Zain, C. R. C. M. 2019: Elevated CO2 concentration and air temperature impacts on mangrove plants (Rhizophora apiculata) under controlled environment. Iraqi Journal of Science, 1658-1666.

DOI: 10.24996/ijs.2019.60.8.1

Google Scholar

[6] Kim, K. W, Oh, C. Y, Lee, J.C, Lee, S, Kim, P.G, 2013: Alteration of leaf surface structures of poplars under elevated air temperature and carbon dioxide concentration. Applied Microscopy 43:110–116.

DOI: 10.9729/am.2013.43.3.110

Google Scholar

[7] Lee, H.S, Lee, S, Lee, J.C, Kim, K. W, Kim, P.G, 2013: Effects of Elevated CO2 Concentration and Temperature on Physiological Characters of Liriodendron tulipifera. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 15:145–152.

DOI: 10.5532/kjafm.2013.15.3.145

Google Scholar

[8] Clough, B, 2012: Continuing The Journey Amongst Mangroves. ISME Mangrove Educational Book Series No. 1. https://www.scribd.com/document/233575072/Continuing-the-Journey-Amongst-Mangroves-Clough-2013-Part-I

DOI: 10.1163/9789004322714_cclc_2015-0014-001

Google Scholar

[9] Ball, M.C, Cochrane, M.J, Rawson, M.H, 1997: Growth and Water Use of the Mangroves Rhizophora apiculata and R. stylosa in Response to Salinity and Humidity under Ambient and Elevated Concentrations of Atmospheric CO2. Plant, Cell and Environment 20: 1158–66.

DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-144.x

Google Scholar

[10] Giri, Chandra, Jordan Long, Sawaid Abbas, Mani R, Murali, F. M, Qamer, B, Pengra, D, Thau, 2015: Distribution and Dynamics of Mangrove Forests of South Asia Journal of Environmental Management 148: 101–11. https://doi.org/.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.020

Google Scholar

[11] Hassan, M.d, Kamrul, Vipak Jintana, Suvi Kuittinen, Ari Pappinen, 2018 : Management Practices and Aboveground Biomass Production Patterns of Rhizophora Apiculata Plantation: Study from a Mangrove Area in Samut Songkram Province, Thailand. BioResources 13 (4) 7826–50.

DOI: 10.15376/biores.13.4.7826-7850

Google Scholar

[12] Wan Juliana, W.A, Razali, M. S, Latiff, A, 2014: Mangrove Ecosystems of Asia: Status, Challenges and Management Strategies, distribution and rarity of Rhizophoraceae in peninsular Malaysia. Springer. 23-36.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-8582-7_2

Google Scholar

[13] Nurdin, C.M, Kusharto, I, Tanziha, M, Januwati, 2009: Chlorophyll Level of Various Geen Leaves and Copper-chlorophyll derivatives and its Charaterization. Jurnal Gizi Dan Pangan 4: 13-19.

DOI: 10.25182/jgp.2009.4.1.13-19

Google Scholar

[14] Arnon, D. I, 1949: Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant physiology 24(1) 1.

DOI: 10.1104/pp.24.1.1

Google Scholar

[15] Mackinney, G, 1941: Absorption of light by chlorophyll solutions. J. biol. Chem 140(2) 315–322.

Google Scholar

[16] Pedrol, N, 2001: Handbook of Plant Ecophysiology Techniques. Handbook of Plant Ecophysiology Techniques, no. January 2001.

DOI: 10.1007/0-306-48057-3

Google Scholar

[17] Bradford, M. M, 1976: A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical biochemistry 72(1–2) 248–254.

DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3

Google Scholar

[18] Ethier, G. J. Livingston, N. J, 2004: On the need to incorporate sensitivity to CO2 transfer conductance into the Farquhar-von Caemmerer-Berry leaf photosynthesis model. Plant, Cell and Environment 27(2) 137–153

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01140.x

Google Scholar

[19] Wang P, Noor H, Zhong R, Sun M, Noor F, Gao Z, 2022: Growth Physiological Characteristics, and Fluorescence Characteristics of the Light-adapted State of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Response to Nitrogen Application Levels. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research.; 10(7): 437-48.

DOI: 10.12691/jfnr-10-7-1

Google Scholar

[20] Xu Y, Feng Z, Peng J, Tarvainen L, 2022: Elevated ozone decreases the activity of Rubisco in poplar but not its activation under fluctuating light. Tr ee Physiology. Apr 21.

DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpac043

Google Scholar

[21] Ma, D, Ding Q, Guo Z, Xu C, Liang P, Zhao Z, Song S, Zheng H.L, 2022: The genome of a mangrove plant, Avicennia marina, provides insights into adaptation to coastal intertidal habitats. Planta. 256(1):1-7.

DOI: 10.1007/s00425-022-03916-0

Google Scholar

[22] Lele N, Kripa MK, Panda M, Das SK, Nivas AH, Divakaran N, Naik-Gaonkar S, Sawant A, Pattnaik AK, Samal RN, Thangaradjou T. 2021: Seasonal variation in photosynthetic rates and satellite-based GPP estimation over mangrove forest. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. Feb;193(2):1-20.

DOI: 10.1007/s10661-021-08846-0

Google Scholar

[23] Sharma, P, Jha AB, Dubey R.S, 2019: Oxidative stress and antioxidative defense system in plants growing under abiotic stresses. In Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress, Fourth Edition Aug 6 (pp.93-136). CRC press.

DOI: 10.1201/9781351104609-7

Google Scholar

[24] Green, T, Gourdain, E, Hirschy, G, Sine, M, Geyer, M, Laun, N, Zude-Sasse, M, Durner, D, Koch, C, Rhemouga ,N, Schill, J, 2022: Farming System Perspective. In Handbook Digital Farming (pp.277-339). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-64378-5_5

Google Scholar

[25] Karkehabadi, S, 2005: Structure-function studies of ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase: activation, thermostability, and CO2/O2 specificity. Vol. 2005, no. 28.

Google Scholar

[26] Fabre, D, Yin, X, Dingkuhn, M, Clément-Vidal, A, Roques, S, Rouan, L., Soutiras, A., Luquet, D, 2019: Is triose phosphate utilization involved in the feedback inhibition of photosynthesis in rice under conditions of sink limitation. Journal of Experimental Botany 70: 5771–5783.

DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erz318

Google Scholar

[27] Zheng,Y, Li, F., Hao, L.A, Shedayi, A, Guo, L, Ma, C, Huang, B, 2018: The optimal CO2 concentrations for the growth of three perennial grass species. BMC Plant Biology 18(1)1–12

DOI: 10.1186/s12870-018-1243-3

Google Scholar

[28] Long, S. P, 1991: Modification of the response of photosynthetic productivity to rising temperature by atmospheric CO2 concentrations: has its importance been underestimated. Plant, Cell & Environment 14(8)729–739.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1991.tb01439.x

Google Scholar

[29] Reef, R, Slot, M, Motro, U, Motro, M, Motro, Y, Adame, M. F, Garcia, M, 2016: The effects of CO2 and nutrient fertilisation on the growth and temperature response of the mangrove Avicennia germinans. Photosynthesis Research 129(2)159–170

DOI: 10.1007/s11120-016-0278-2

Google Scholar

[30] Lee, S, Oh, C, Han, S, Kim, K. W, Kim, P, 2014: Photosynthetic Responses of Populus alba × glandulosa to Elevated CO2 Concentration and Air Temperature. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 16:22-28

DOI: 10.5532/KJAFM.2014.16.1.22

Google Scholar

[31] Onoda, Y, Hirose, T, Hikosaka, K, 2009: Does leaf photosynthesis adapt to CO2-enriched environments? An experiment on plants originating from three natural CO2 springs. New Phytologist 182: 698-709.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02786.x

Google Scholar

[32] Nakamura, I, Onoda, Y, Matsushima, N, Yokoyama, J, Kawata, M, Hikosaka, K, 2011: Phenotypic and genetic differences in a perennial herb across a natural gradient of CO2 concentration. Oecologia 165: 809-818.

DOI: 10.1007/s00442-010-1900-1

Google Scholar

[33] Tamimi, B. M., Wan Julaina, W. A, Nizam, M. S., Zain, C. R. C. M, 2021: Temperature Stress on Physiological and Morphological Traits in Rhizophora apiculata. Baghdad Science Journal, 18(4 Supplement).

DOI: 10.21123/bsj.2021.18.4(suppl.).1492

Google Scholar