An Improved Denoising of Medical Images Based on Hybrid Filter Approach and Assess Quality Metrics

Article Preview

Abstract:

Degradation of images and segmentation are the two most demanding fields for medical image processing, particularly when explicitly applied. The involvement of noise not only deteriorates the visual quality but also the precision of the segmentation which is vital to the medical diagnosis process of development. The complicated and monotonous main task is to manually denoise medical images such as CT, ultrasound and large numbers of clinical routine MRI images. The medical image must be denoised automatically. The proposed approach is associated with less complexity, this follows from the fact that, the design of system and time for optimization. Results show their efficacy for noise removal in medical ultrasound and MRI images .The final results of the proposed scheme in terms of noise reduction and structural preservation are excellent. However the proposed scheme is compared with existing methods and the performance of the proposed method in terms of visual quality, image quality index, peak SNR and PSNR is shown to be superior to existing methods.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

27-36

Citation:

Online since:

February 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] L. I. Rudin, S. Osher, and E. Fatemi, Nonlinear total variation-based noise removal algorithms,, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, vol. 60, no. 1-4, p.259–268, (1992).

DOI: 10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-f

Google Scholar

[2] G. Aubert and P. Kornprobst, Mathematical Problems in Image Processing, Partial Differential Equations and the Calculus of Variations, vol. 147 of Applied Mathematical Sciences, Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, New York, NY, USA, 2ndedition, (2006).

DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-44588-5

Google Scholar

[3] T. F. Chan and J. Shen, Image Processing and Analysis: Variational, PDE, Wavelet, and Stochastic Methods, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, USA,(2005).

DOI: 10.1186/1475-925x-5-38

Google Scholar

[4] J. Xu, A. Feng, Y. Hao, X. Zhang, and Y. Han, Image deblurring and denoising by an improved variational model,, International Journal of Electronics and Communications, vol. 70, no. 9, p.1128–1133, (2016).

DOI: 10.1016/j.aeue.2016.05.008

Google Scholar

[5] L. Jiang, J. Huang, X.-G. LV, and J. Liu, Alternating direction method for the high-order total variation-based Poisson noise removal problem,, Numerical Algorithms, vol. 69, no. 3, p.495–516, (2015).

DOI: 10.1007/s11075-014-9908-y

Google Scholar

[6] M. Elad and M. Aharon, Image denoising via sparse and redundant representations over learned dictionaries,, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 15, no. 12, p.3736–3745,(2006).

DOI: 10.1109/tip.2006.881969

Google Scholar

[7] N. Mustafa, J. Ping, S. Ahmed, and M. Giess, Medical image de-noising schemes using wavelet transform with fixed formthresholding,, International Journal of Advanced ComputerScience and Applications, vol. 6, no. 10, p.173–178, (2015).

DOI: 10.14569/ijacsa.2015.061024

Google Scholar

[8] W. Jifara, F. Jiang, S. Rho, M. Cheng, and S. Liu, Medicalimagedenoising using convolutional neural network: a residual learning approach,, The Journal of Supercomputing, p.1–15,(2017).

DOI: 10.1007/s11227-017-2080-0

Google Scholar

[9] F. Zhang, N. Cai, J. Wu, G. Cen, H. Wang, and X. Chen, Image denoising method based on a deep convolution neuralnetwork,, IET Image Processing, vol. 12, no. 4, p.485–493, (2018).

DOI: 10.1049/iet-ipr.2017.0389

Google Scholar

[10] K. Isogawa, T. Ida, T. Shiodera, and T. Takeguchi, Deep shrinkage convolutional neural network for adaptive noise reduction,, IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 25, no. 2, p.224–228, (2018).

DOI: 10.1109/lsp.2017.2782270

Google Scholar

[11] Liu C, Szeliski R, Kang SB, Zitnick CL, Freeman WT. Automatic estimation and removal of noise from a single image. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and MachineIntelligence. 2008 Feb; 30(2).

DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2007.1176

Google Scholar

[12] Anutam, Rajni. Performance analysis of image denoisingwith wavelet thresholding methods for different levels ofdecomposition. The International Journal of Multimediaand Its Applications. 2014 Jun; 6(3).

DOI: 10.5121/ijma.2014.6303

Google Scholar

[13] A. Piˇzurica, W. Philips, I. Lemahieu, and M. Acheroy, Despeckling SAR images using wavelets and a new class of adaptive shrinkage functions,, Proc. IEEE Internat. Conf. on Image Proc., ICIP 2001, Thessaloniki, Grece, Oct (2001).

DOI: 10.1109/icip.2001.958467

Google Scholar

[14] A. Buades, B. Coll, and J Morel.On image denoising methods.Technical Report 2004- 15, CMLA, (2004).

Google Scholar

[15] A. Buades, B. Coll, and J Morel.A non-local algorithm for image denoising.IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, (2005).

DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2005.38

Google Scholar

[16] A. Foi and G. Boracchi, Foveated self-similarity in nonlocal image filtering,, in SPIE Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XVII, vol. 8291. Burlingame, California, USA: SPIE, (2012).

DOI: 10.1117/12.912217

Google Scholar

[17] A. Buades, B. Coll, and J. Morel, A review of image denoising algorithms, with a new one,, Multiscale Modeling Simulation, vol. 4, no. 2, p.490, (2005).

DOI: 10.1137/040616024

Google Scholar