A Hybrid Human–Vehicle Dynamic Model for Motion Sickness Estimation in Intelligent Driving Scenarios

Article Preview

Abstract:

With the development of intelligent driving technology, there are more and more complaints about motion sickness from passengers in autonomous vehicles. A precise tool is needed to measure ride comfort. This paper proposes a motion sickness estimation method that combines vehicle dynamics with human factors. It integrates the six-degree-of-freedom SVC model into a comprehensive human-car interaction framework. Real-world experiments collected relevant data from in-vehicle tests, the average accuracy rate of head linear acceleration prediction is 89.1%, and the accuracy rate of angular velocity prediction is 84.6%. The heart rate variability data and participant feedback are consistent with the model prediction. This consistency means the method can capture real passenger motion perception. It helps to improve the ride comfort of autonomous driving.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

171-188

Citation:

Online since:

July 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. Sun, A.P. Petropulu, H.V. Poor, MIMO radar for advanced driver-assistance systems and autonomous driving: Advantages and challenges, IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 37 (2020) 98-117

DOI: 10.1109/MSP.2020.2978507

Google Scholar

[2] J. Iskander, M. Attia, K. Saleh, D. Nahavandi, A. Abobakr, S. Mohamed, H. Asadi, A. Khosravi, C.P. Lim, M. Hossny, From car sickness to autonomous car sickness: A review, Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 62 (2019) 716-726

DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.02.020

Google Scholar

[3] X. Ge, Ultra-reliable low-latency communications in autonomous vehicular networks, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 68 (2019) 5005-5016

DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2019.2903793

Google Scholar

[4] J.T. Reason, Motion sickness adaptation: a neural mismatch model, J. R. Soc. Med. 71 (1978) 819-829

DOI: 10.1177/014107687807101109

Google Scholar

[5] M. Treisman, Motion sickness: an evolutionary hypothesis, Science 197 (1977) 493-495

DOI: 10.1126/science.301659

Google Scholar

[6] T.A. Stoffregen, L.J. Smart Jr, Postural instability precedes motion sickness, Brain Res. Bull. 47 (1998) 437-448

DOI: 10.1016/S0361-9230(98)00102-6

Google Scholar

[7] K.E. Cullen, Vestibular processing during natural self-motion: implications for perception and action, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 20 (2019) 346-363

DOI: 10.1038/s41583-019-0153-1

Google Scholar

[8] W. Bles, J.E. Bos, B. De Graaf, E. Groen, A.H. Wertheim, Motion sickness: only one provocative conflict?, Brain Res. Bull. 47 (1998) 481-487

DOI: 10.1016/S0361-9230(98)00115-4

Google Scholar

[9] A.M. Sufrinko, N.E. Kegel, A. Mucha, M.W. Collins, A.P. Kontos, History of high motion sickness susceptibility predicts vestibular dysfunction following sport/recreation-related concussion, Clin. J. Sport Med. 29 (2019) 318-323

DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000528

Google Scholar

[10] T. Wada, N. Kamij, A mathematical model of motion sickness in 6DOF motion and its application to vehicle passengers, arXiv preprint (2015) arXiv:1504.05261

Google Scholar

[11] R. Tan, R. Gao, W. Li, K. Cao, Y. Li, C. Lv, F.-Y. Wang, D. Cao, Xsickness in intelligent mobile spaces and metaverses, IEEE Intell. Syst. 37 (2022) 86-94

DOI: 10.1109/MIS.2022.3208485

Google Scholar

[12] C. Certosini, Human-vehicle interaction in automated vehicles: The issue of carsickness, 2020.

Google Scholar

[13] Y. Zheng, B. Shyrokau, T. Keviczky, Comfort-oriented driving: performance comparison between human drivers and motion planners, arXiv preprint (2023) arXiv:2301.10538

Google Scholar

[14] K.E. Money, Motion sickness, Physiol. Rev. 50 (1970) 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev. 1970.50.1.1

Google Scholar

[15] C.G. Fowler, A. Sweet, E. Steffel, Effects of motion sickness severity on the vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials, J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 25 (2014) 814-822

DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.25.9.4

Google Scholar

[16] X. Zhang, Y. Sun, Motion sickness predictors in college students and their first experience sailing at sea, Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perform. 91 (2020) 71-78

DOI: 10.3357/amhp.5386.2020

Google Scholar

[17] J.F. Golding, Predicting individual differences in motion sickness susceptibility by questionnaire, Pers. Individ. Dif. 41 (2006) 237-248

DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.01.012

Google Scholar

[18] E. Chang, H.T. Kim, B. Yoo, Virtual reality sickness: a review of causes and measurements, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 36 (2020) 1658-1682

DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2020.1778351

Google Scholar

[19] T. Asawavichienjinda, S. Patarapak, Reliability of the Thai version of the motion sickness susceptibility questionnaire short-form, Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perform. 90 (2019) 26-31

DOI: 10.3357/amhp.5203.2019

Google Scholar

[20] D. Saredakis, A. Szpak, B. Birckhead, H.A.D. Keage, A. Rizzo, T. Loetscher, Factors associated with virtual reality sickness in head-mounted displays: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Front. Hum. Neurosci. 14 (2020) 96

DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00096

Google Scholar

[21] P. Kourtesis, S. Collina, L.A.A. Doumas, S.E. MacPherson, Validation of the virtual reality neuroscience questionnaire: maximum duration of immersive virtual reality sessions without the presence of pertinent adverse symptomatology, Front. Hum. Neurosci. 13 (2019) 417

DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00417

Google Scholar

[22] T.M. Lee, J.-C. Yoon, I.-K. Lee, Motion sickness prediction in stereoscopic videos using 3d convolutional neural networks, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 25 (2019) 1919-1927

DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2019.2899186

Google Scholar

[23] C.C.T. Guo, D.J.Z. Chen, I.Y. Wei, R.H.Y. So, R.T.F. Cheung, Correlations between individual susceptibility to visually induced motion sickness and decaying time constant of after-nystagmus, Appl. Ergon. 63 (2017) 1-8

DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.03.011

Google Scholar

[24] T. Gruden, N.B. Popović, K. Stojmenova, G. Jakus, N. Miljković, S. Tomažič, J. Sodnik, Electrogastrography in autonomous vehicles—an objective method for assessment of motion sickness in simulated driving environments, Sensors 21 (2021) 550

DOI: 10.3390/s21020550

Google Scholar

[25] T. Irmak, D.M. Pool, R. Happee, Objective and subjective responses to motion sickness: the group and the individual, Exp. Brain Res. 239 (2021) 515-531

DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05986-6

Google Scholar

[26] J. Smyth, S. Birrell, R. Woodman, P. Jennings, Exploring the utility of EDA and skin temperature as individual physiological correlates of motion sickness, Appl. Ergon. 92 (2021) 103315

DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103315

Google Scholar

[27] J.-Q. Wang, R.-R. Qi, L.-L. Pan, W. Zhou, L.-L. Zhang, Y.-L. Cai, Motion sickness and resting energy expenditure in Chinese male adults, Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perform. 87 (2016) 360-366

DOI: 10.3357/amhp.4438.2016

Google Scholar

[28] S. Coderre, H. Mandin, P.H. Harasym, G.H. Fick, Diagnostic reasoning strategies and diagnostic success, Med. Educ. 37 (2003) 695-703

DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01577.x

Google Scholar

[29] C. Xu, F. Huang, S. Liu, H. Wei, Z. Peng, Motion sickness prediction of electric vehicles for natural driving scenarios, Int. J. Automot. Technol. (2025) 1-16

DOI: 10.1007/s12239-025-00360-3

Google Scholar

[30] U. Kawakami, K. Sawada, Steering control considering motion sickness and vehicle performance via DDPG algorithm and 6-DoF-SVC model, in: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 2024, pp.1302-1307

DOI: 10.1109/smc54092.2024.10831355

Google Scholar

[31] S. Salter, C. Diels, P. Herriotts, S. Kanarachos, D. Thake, Model to predict motion sickness within autonomous vehicles, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D J. Automob. Eng. 234 (2020) 1330-1345

DOI: 10.1177/0954407019879785

Google Scholar

[32] Y. Wu, Q. Li, X. Chen, Multimodal in-vehicle interaction design to support situation awareness and reduce motion sickness in autonomous driving: a systematic review, in: International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 2025, pp.120-138

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-92712-6_8

Google Scholar