Oxidative Biodegradation of Dacarbazine-Containing Composite Materials Based on Hydrophilic Polyurethane Urea under Model Conditions of the Inflammatory Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study investigates the biodegradability of composite materials containing dacarbazine (DAC), synthesized from hydrophilic polyurethane-ureas (PUUs) incorporating fragments of 4,4′-diaminodiphenylmethane (DADPh) and a poly(vinyl alcohol)-poly(ethylene glycol) (PVA-PEG) graft copolymer under simulated inflammatory conditions mimicking blood contact. Biodegradability was assessed using Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, tensile testing, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and Transmission Optical Microscopy (TOM) by analyzing changes in the structural, mechanical, thermophysical properties, and composite surface morphology after 1, 3, and 6 months of incubation in Fenton’s reagent. The results revealed that DAC-containing composites undergo surface structural rearrangements characterized by alterations in hydrogen bonding and partial cleavage of chemical bonds under oxidative conditions. These findings confirm that PUU-based DAC composites containing DADPh and PVA-PEG fragments are susceptible to oxidative degradation in Fenton’s reagent. The biodegradability of these materials ensures controlled DAC release during progressive polymer matrix degradation, highlighting their potential as temporary implantable systems for localized delivery of the antitumor agent DAC.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

33-49

Citation:

Online since:

July 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. Wendels, L. Avérous. Biobased polyurethanes for biomedical applications, Bioactive Materials. 6(4), (2021), 1083–1106.

DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.10.002

Google Scholar

[2] M. Cui, Z. Chai, Y. Lu, J. Zhu, J. Chen. Developments of polyurethane in biomedical applications: A review, Resources Chemicals and Materials. 2(4), (2023), 262-276.

DOI: 10.1016/j.recm.2023.07.004

Google Scholar

[3] L.C. Rusu, L.C. Ardelean, A.A. Jitariu, C.A. Miu, C.G. Streian. An Insight into the Structural Diversity and Clinical Applicability of Polyurethanes in Biomedicine, Polymers. 12(5), (2020), 1197.

DOI: 10.3390/polym12051197

Google Scholar

[4] S S. Azarmgin, B. Torabinejad, R. Kalantarzadeh, H. Garcia, C.A. Velazquez, G. Lopez, M. Vazquez, G. Rosales, B.S. Heidari, S.M. Davachi. Polyurethanes and Their Biomedical Applications, ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 10(11), (2024), 6828-6859.

DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01352

Google Scholar

[5] A. Rubio Hernández-Sampelayo, L. Diñeiro, D.M. González-García, E. Martínez Campos, R. Navarro, Á. Marcos-Fernández. Biodegradable Polyurethanes for Tissue Engineering: Influence of L-Lactide Content on Degradation and Mechanical Properties, Polymers (Basel). 17(12), (2025), 1685.

DOI: 10.3390/polym17121685

Google Scholar

[6] M. Sobczak, K. Kedra. Biomedical Polyurethanes for Anti-Cancer Drug Delivery Systems: A Brief, Comprehensive Review, Int J Mol Sci. 23(15), (2022), 8181.

DOI: 10.3390/ijms23158181

Google Scholar

[7] R. Iyer, T. Nguyen, D. Padanilam, C. Xu, D. Saha, K.T Nguyen, Y. Hong. Glutathione-responsive biodegradable polyurethane nanoparticles for lung cancer treatment, J Control Release. 321, (2020), 363–371.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.02.021

Google Scholar

[8] H.C. Wu, Y. Feng, X.Y. Song, C.Y. Song, J.L. Chen, Y.C. Wang, X.L. He, R.C. Liang, J.H. Li, H. Tan. Implantable Polyurethane Scaffolds Loading with PEG-Paclitaxel Conjugates for the Treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme, Chinese Journal of Polymer Science. 40(5), (2022), 491–503.

DOI: 10.1007/s10118-022-2695-3

Google Scholar

[9] H. Yin, B. Du, Y. Chen, N. Song, Z. Li, J. Li, F. Luo, H. Tan. Dual-encapsulated biodegradable 3D scaffold from liposome and waterborne polyurethane for local drug control release in breast cancer therapy, Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition. 31(17), (2020), 2220-2237.

DOI: 10.1080/09205063.2020.1796230

Google Scholar

[10] D. Wienen, T. Gries, S.L. Cooper, D.E. Heath. An overview of polyurethane biomaterials and their use in drug delivery, Journal of Controlled Release. 363, (2023), 376-388.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.09.036

Google Scholar

[11] J.Y. Cherng, T.Y. Hou, M.F. Shih, H. Talsma, W.E. Hennink. Polyurethane-based drug delivery systems, International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 450(1–2), (2013), 145-162.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.04.063

Google Scholar

[12] N. Bose, K. Rajappan. Summary on polyurethane-based drug delivery system in perspective for future implantable drug system, International Journal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials. 73(18), (2024), 1629-1648.

DOI: 10.1080/00914037.2023.2301647

Google Scholar

[13] J.V. Cauich-Rodríguez, L.H. Chan-Chan, F. Hernandez-Sánchez, M.J. Cervantes-Uc. Degradation of Polyurethanes for Cardiovascular Applications, Advances in Biomaterials Science and Biomedical Applications. (2013), 51–82.

Google Scholar

[14] P. Bhavsar, M. Bhave, H.K. Webb. Solving the plastic dilemma: the fungal and bacterial biodegradability of polyurethanes, World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 39(5), (2023), 122.

DOI: 10.1007/s11274-023-03558-8

Google Scholar

[15] Z. Miri, S. Farè, Q. Ma, H.J. Haugen. Updates on polyurethane and its multifunctional applications in biomedical engineering, Progress in Biomedical Engineering. 5 (4), (2023), 042001.

DOI: 10.1088/2516-1091/acef84

Google Scholar

[16] A. Carnicer-Lombarte, S.-T. Chen, G.G. Malliaras, D.G. Barone. Foreign Body Reaction to Implanted Biomaterials and Its Impact in Nerve Neuroprosthetics, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9, (2021), 622524.

DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.622524

Google Scholar

[17] A. Kaushal, Y. Zhang, L.L Ballantyne, L.E. Fitzpatrick. The extended effect of adsorbed damage-associated molecular patterns and Toll-like receptor 2 signaling on macrophage-material interactions, Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 10, (2022), 959512.

DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.959512

Google Scholar

[18] Y.V.R. Gomes, A.A. Tavares, R.C. Barbosa, A.F. Tomaz, W.J.B. Sousa, L.C.C. Oliveira, S.M.L. Silva, M.V.L. Fook. Biological responses to biomaterials: a review, Braz J Med Biol Res. 58, (2025), e14599.

DOI: 10.1590/1414-431x2025e14599

Google Scholar

[19] A.S. Mathew, K. Sreenivasan, P.V. Mohanan, T.V. Kumary, M. Mohanty. Polyurethane Degradation in the Biological Milieu, Trendsin Biomaterials and Artificial Organs. 19(2), (2006), 115–121.

Google Scholar

[20] E. Novo, M. Parola. Redox mechanisms in hepatic chronic wound healing and fibrogenesis, Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair. 1, (2008), 5.

DOI: 10.1186/1755-1536-1-5

Google Scholar

[21] C. Zhang, L. Liu, Y. Pan, R. Qin, W. Wang, M. Zhou, Y. Zhang. Detection methodologies and mechanisms of reactive oxygen species generated in Fenton/Fenton-like processes, Separation and Purification Technology. 355(A), (2025), 129578.

DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2024.129578

Google Scholar

[22] T.P. Mamenko, S.Ya. Kots. Lipid peroxidation of cell membranes in the formation and regulation of plant protective reactions, Ukrainian Botanical Journal. 77(4), (2020), 331–343.

DOI: 10.15407/ukrbotj77.04.331

Google Scholar

[23] Z.Zhao. Hydroxyl radical generations form the physiologically relevant Fenton-like reactions, Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 208, (2023), 510–515.

DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2023.09.013

Google Scholar

[24] Shoda S., Hyodo F., Tachibana Y., Kiniwa M., Naganuma T., Eto H., Koyasu N., Murata M., Matsuo M. Imaging of Hydroxyl-Radical Generation Using Dynamic Nuclear Polarization-Magnetic Resonance Imaging and a Spin-Trapping Agent. Analytical Chemistry. 92(21), (2020), 14408–14414.

DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02331

Google Scholar

[25] Y. Kril, A.M. Havrylyuk, V.V. Chopyak, Yu.Ya. Kit, A.V. Kotsiuruba, R.S. Stoika. The functional activity changes in rat's neutrophils in experimental collagen arthritis, The Animal Biology. 16(3), (2014), 60–67.

Google Scholar

[26] E.M. Christenson, J.M. Anderson, A. Hiltner. Oxidative mechanisms of poly(carbonateurethane) and poly(etherurethane) biodegradation: in vivo and in vitro correlations, J Biomed Mater Res A. 70(2), (2004), 245–55.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30067

Google Scholar

[27] G.T. Howard. Biodegradation of polyurethane: a review, International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 49(4), (2002), 245-252.

DOI: 10.1016/s0964-8305(02)00051-3

Google Scholar

[28] A. Raczyńska, A. Góra, I. André. An overview on polyurethane-degrading enzymes, Biotechnol Adv. 77, (2024), 108439.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2024.108439

Google Scholar

[29] X. Jin, J. Dong, X. Guo, M. Ding, R. Bao, Y. Luo. Current advances in polyurethane biodegradation, Polymer International. 71(12), (2022), 1384-1392.

DOI: 10.1002/pi.6360

Google Scholar

[30] J. Wojturska. Enzymatic degradation of polyurethanes. Part II. Influence of the chemical structure of the polyurethanes and enzymatic hydrolysis conditions, Polimery. 56(3), (2011), 177-184.

DOI: 10.14314/polimery.2011.177

Google Scholar

[31] F. Di Bisceglie, F. Quartinello, R. Vielnascher, G.M. Guebitz. A. Pellis Cutinase-Catalyzed Polyester-Polyurethane Degradation: Elucidation of the Hydrolysis Mechanism, Polymers. 14(3), (2022), 411.

DOI: 10.3390/polym14030411

Google Scholar

[32] J.E. McBane, J.P. Santerre, R.S. Labow. The interaction between hydrolytic and oxidative pathways in macrophage-mediated polyurethane degradation, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 82A(4), (2007), 984-994.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31263

Google Scholar

[33] S.J. Stachelek, I. Alferiev, M. Ueda, E.C. Eckels, K.T. Gleason, R.J. Levy. Prevention of polyurethane oxidative degradation with phenolic antioxidants covalently attached to the hard segments: Structure–function relationships, J Biomed Mater Res A. 94(3), (2010), 751–759.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32755

Google Scholar

[34] S.J Stachelek, I. Alferiev, H. Choi, C.W. Chan, B. Zubiate, M. Sacks, R. Composto, I-W. Chen, R.J. Levy. Prevention of oxidative degradation of polyurethane by covalent attachment of di-tert-butylphenol residues, J Biomed Mater Res A. 78(4), (2006), 653-61.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30828

Google Scholar

[35] J. Brzeska, A. Tercjak, W. Sikorska, B. Mendrek, M. Kowalczuk, M. Rutkowska. Degradability of Polyurethanes and Their Blends with Polylactide, Chitosan and Starch. Polymers. 13(8), (2021), 1202.

DOI: 10.3390/polym13081202

Google Scholar

[36] T. Vislohuzova, R. Rozhnova, T. Kiselova, G. Kozlova. Development and research of composite materials with dacarbazine based on polyurethane-urea with fragments of polyvinyl alcohol-polyethylene glycol graft copolymer in the structure, Polimernyi Zhurnal. 46(2), (2024), 135–144.

DOI: 10.15407/polymerj.46.02.135

Google Scholar

[37] A. Hervieu, C. Re´be´, F. Ve´gran, F. Chalmin, M. Bruchard, P. Vabres, L. Apetoh, F. Ghiringhelli, G. Mignot. Dacarbazine-Mediated Upregulation of NKG2D Ligands on Tumor Cells Activates NK and CD8 T Cells and Restrains Melanoma Growth, Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 133(2), (2013), 499-508.

DOI: 10.1038/jid.2012.273

Google Scholar

[38] G. Jiang, R-H. Li, C. Sun, Y-Q. Liu, J-N. Zheng. Dacarbazine Combined Targeted Therapy versus Dacarbazine Alone in Patients with Malignant Melanoma: A Meta-Analysis, PLoS ONE, 9(12), (2014), e111920.

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111920

Google Scholar

[39] A.M. Eggermont, J.M. Kirkwood. Re-evaluating the role of dacarbazine in metastatic melanoma: what have we learned in 30 years? European Journal of Cancer. 40(12), (2004), 1825–1836.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.04.030

Google Scholar

[40] M.R. Middleton, J.J. Grob, N. Aaronson, G. Fierlbeck, W. Tilgen, S. Seiter, M. Gore, S. Aamdal, J. Cebon, A. Coates, B. Dreno, M. Henz, D. Schadendorf, A. Kapp, J. Weiss, U. Fraass, P. Statkevich, M. Muller, N. Thatcher. Randomized phase III study of temozolomide versus dacarbazine in the treatment of patients with advanced metastatic malignant melanoma, Journal of Clinical Oncology. 18(1), (2000), 158–166.

DOI: 10.1200/jco.2000.18.1.158

Google Scholar

[41] T. Vislohuzova, R. Rozhnova, T. Kiselova, G. Kozlova, L. Palona. Investigation of the biodegradation of polyurethane-ureas containing fragments of graft copolymer polyvinyl alcohol–polyethylene glycol in the structure under model conditions of the inflammatory process, Polimernyi Zhurnal. 47(1), (2025), 30–38.

DOI: 10.15407/polymerj.47.01.030

Google Scholar

[42] E. Pretsch, P. Bёllmann, C. Affolter. Structure determination of organic compounds. Tables of Spectral Data. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York. 2000.

Google Scholar

[43] C. Brian Smith. Infrared Spectroscopy of Polymers XIII: Polyurethanes, Spectroscopy. 38(7), (2023),14–16.

Google Scholar

[44] ISO 527-3:2018 Plastics — Determination of tensile propertiesPart 3: Test conditions for films and sheets

Google Scholar

[45] ISO 11357-1 Plastics ‒ Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) ‒ Part 1: General principles

Google Scholar

[46] ISO 11357-2 Plastics ‒ Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) ‒ Part 2: Determination of glass transition temperature and step height

DOI: 10.3403/30257999

Google Scholar

[47] B. Wunderlich. Thermal Analysis of Polymeric Materials, first ed., Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2005.

Google Scholar

[48] l.B. Ravat, M. Grivet, A. Chambaudet. Evolution of the degradation and oxidation of polyurethane versus the electron irradiation parameters: Fluence, flux and temperature, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 179(2), (2001), 243-248.

DOI: 10.1016/s0168-583x(01)00571-7

Google Scholar

[49] T. Zhang, F. Xie, J. Motuzas, P. Bryant, V. Kurusingal, J.M. Colwell, B. Laycock. Early-stage photodegradation of aromatic poly(urethane-urea) elastomers, Polymer Degradation and Stability. 157, (2018), 181-198.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.09.020

Google Scholar

[50] A.T. Neffe, G. Tronci, A. Alteheld, A. Lendlein. Controlled Change of Mechanical Properties during Hydrolytic Degradation of Polyester Urethane Networks, Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics. 211(2), (2010), 182-194.

DOI: 10.1002/macp.200900441

Google Scholar

[51] Y. Feng, C. Li. Study on oxidative degradation behaviors of polyesterurethane network, Polymer Degradation and Stability. 91(8), (2006), 1711-1716.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.12.002

Google Scholar

[52] L.S. Dandeniyage, W. Knower, R. Adhikari, M. Bown, R. Shanks, B. Adhikari, P.A. Gunatillake. In vitro oxidative stability of high strength siloxane poly(urethane-urea) elastomers based on linked-macrodiol, J Biomed Mater Res Part B. 107(8), (2019), 2557-2565.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34346

Google Scholar

[53] M. Bulacu, E. van der Giessen. Molecular-dynamics simulation study of the glass transition in amorphous polymers with controlled chain stiffness, Phys. Rev. E. 76(1), (2007). 011807.

DOI: 10.1103/physreve.76.011807

Google Scholar

[54] Y. Ma, D. Yang, W. Shi, S. Li, Z. Fan, J. Tu, W. Wang. Preparation and properties of novel poly(propylene oxide)-block-polylactide-based polyurethane foams, Polymer Engineering and Science. 53(2), (2013), 343-352.

DOI: 10.1002/pen.23269

Google Scholar

[55] T.V. Vislohuzova, R.A. Rozhnova, N.A. Galatenko, L.F. Narazhayko. Investigation of Biodegradation and Properties of Polyurethane Foam Composite Materials with Lysozyme in Vitro, Polymernyi Zhurnal. 44(1), (2022), 41-52.

DOI: 10.15407/polymerj.44.01.041

Google Scholar

[56] D.J. Fouquette, N. Mccormick. Polyurethane Coating Composition. U.S. Patent 20200079965 A1 (2020).

Google Scholar

[57] X.F. Yang, C. Vang, D.E. Tallman, G.P. Bierwagen, S.G. Croll, S. Rohlik. Weathering degradation of a polyurethane coating, Polymer Degradation and Stability. 74, (2001), 341–351.

DOI: 10.1016/s0141-3910(01)00166-5

Google Scholar

[58] D. Arbeiter, T. Reske, M. Teske, D. Bajer, V. Senz, K.-P. Schmitz, N. Grabow, S. Oschatz. Influence of Drug Incorporation on the Physico-Chemical Properties of Poly(l-Lactide) Implant Coating Matrices—A Systematic Study, Polymers. 13(2), (2021), 292.

DOI: 10.3390/polym13020292

Google Scholar

[59] S.H. Choi, I.H. Cho, S. Park. Gemcitabine-incorporated polyurethane films for controlled release of an anticancer drug, Biomaterials Research. 23(1), (2019), 1–7.

DOI: 10.1186/s40824-019-0169-7

Google Scholar

[60] A .Takahara, A.J. Coury, R.W. Hergenrother, S.L. Cooper. Effect of soft segment chemistry on the biostability of segmented polyurethanes. I. In vitro oxidation, J Biomed Mater Res. 25(3), (1991), 341-356.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820250306

Google Scholar

[61] R. Zhu, X. Wang, J. Yang, Y. Wang, Z. Zhang, Y. Hou, F. Lin, Y. Li. Influence of Hard Segments on the Thermal, Phase-Separated Morphology, Mechanical, and Biological Properties of Polycarbonate Urethanes, Applied Sciences. 7(3), (2017), 306.

DOI: 10.3390/app7030306

Google Scholar

[62] D.S. Jacobs, S.R. Huang, Y.L. Cheng, S.A. Rabb, J.M. Gorham, P.J. Krommenhoek, L.L. Yu, T. Nguyen, L. Sung. Surface Degradation and Nanoparticle Release of a Commercial Nanosilica/Polyurethane Coating Under UV Exposure, J Coat Technol Res. 13(5), (2016), 735–751.

DOI: 10.1007/s11998-016-9796-2

Google Scholar