Analyses of Deteriorating Old Masonry Buildings; Characterisation of Materials for Establishment of their Compatible Repairs

Article Preview

Abstract:

Most of the Governmental and religious building structures in Rungwe district are masonry structures built during the German East Africa period. These structures are deteriorating despite of various efforts on their repair intervention using modern cements and paints. This paper studies the types of mineral binders used, composition and physical characteristics of these in-situ mortar materials for the purpose of deciding on their appropriate compatible repair materials. Field observations and investigations, laboratory materials testing and review of the literature showed that the in-situ mortar materials constituted of sub-hydraulic lime mineral binders to natural sand (1:3) mortars. Currently there are no producers of hydraulic lime in Africa and a limited production worldwide. Mix design and analysis of locally available hydrated lime plus pozzolana natural sand (1:3) mortar material have shown compatibility in chemical and major physical properties and characteristics with the substrate in-situ hardened sub-hydraulic masonry mortars. Therefore use of these repair mortars is recommended for compatible repairs to these masonry structures and as a regional alternative to cement based materials for low rise masonry structures.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

47-61

Citation:

Online since:

April 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Schoner, W., Brunner, M. and Mrema, A. (1987). General Introduction to the Structure and Behaviour of Building Materials. Dar es salaam: Faculty of Engineering, University of Dar es salaam.

DOI: 10.18697/ajfand.99.19680

Google Scholar

[2] Palomo, A., Branco-Varela, M. T., Martinez-Ramirez, S., Puertas, F and Fortes, C. Vol. 47 No. 245. (1997). Historical Mortars, Characterization and Durability, New Tendencies for Research. Journal of Materials and Structure, 29-43.

Google Scholar

[3] Ngoma, A. M. (2009). Characterisation and Consolidation of Historical Lime Mortars in Cultural Heritage Buildings and Associated Structures in East Africa. Trika-BKN, Bulletin 101.

Google Scholar

[4] Collepard, M. (1990). Degradation and Restoration of Masonry Walls of Historic Buildings. Journal of Materials and Structure, Volume 23, (134), 81-102.

Google Scholar

[5] Yates, T. and Ferguson, A. (2008). The Use of Lime-based Mortars in New Build. Urmesham, U.K.: NHBC Foundation.

Google Scholar

[6] Sanjurjo-Sánchez J., Trindade, M.J., Blanco-Rotea R., Benavides G. R., Fernández M. D., Burbidge C., Prudêncio M.I. and Dias M.I., . (2010).

Google Scholar

[7] Chever, L. Pavia, R. and Howard, R. (2010). Physical Properties of magnesian Lime Mortars. Materials and Structures, 43, 283-296.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-009-9488-9

Google Scholar

[8] Allen, G. C. and Ball, R. J. (2010). Mechanical Properties of Hydraulic Lime Mortars. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 101.

Google Scholar

[9] Ellison, P. T. (1998). Thesis in Historic Conservation. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Libraries.

Google Scholar

[10] Swolfs, M. and Goeminne, T. . (2009). Building with Lime – Exchange of Experiences from Academic Producers in the Field. Arte Constructo Molenberglei, 18 / B-2627.

Google Scholar

[11] Mindess, S. and Darwin, D. . (2003). Concrete (Vol. Second Edition). England: Pearson Education Limited.

Google Scholar

[12] Groot, C., Ashall, G. and Hughes, J. (2004). Characterization of Old Mortars with Respect to Repai. Italy: RILEM TC 167-COM.

Google Scholar

[13] Hughes, J. and Callebault, K. . (2004). In-Situ Visual Analysis and Practicle Sampling of Historic Mortars. In J. a. Hughes, Characterization of Old Mortars with Respect to Repair. Italy: RILEM TC 167-COM.

DOI: 10.1617/2912143675.002

Google Scholar

[14] Middendorf, B, Hughes, J. J, Callebault, K, Baronio, G and Papayianni, I. (2005). Investigative Methods for the Characterization of Historic Mortars. Part 1 . Journal of Materials and Structure, Volume 38, (134)., 771-780.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02479290

Google Scholar

[15] Schnabel, L. (2009). Mortar Analysis Part 2: Analytical Methods. In Journal of preservation Technology, Vol. XL, No. 2.

Google Scholar

[16] Schueremans, l., Cizer, O., Janssens, E., Serre, G. and Van Balen, K. (2011).

Google Scholar

[17] Ersen, A., Gürdal, E., Güleç, A., Yöney, N. Y., Pekmezci, I. P., and Verdön I. ( 2010). An Evaluation of Binders and Aggregates Used in Artificial Stone Architectural Claddings and Elements in Late 19th - Early 20th Centuries. Metu. Jfa, 207-221.

DOI: 10.4305/metu.jfa.2010.2.11

Google Scholar

[18] Lindqvist, J. E. and Maurenbrecher, P. (2008). RILEM TC 203-RHM: Repair Mortars for Historic Masonry. Testing of Hardened Mortars, A Process of Questioning and Intepreting. Materials and Structures.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-008-9455-x

Google Scholar

[19] Moropoulou, A., Bakolas, A. and Bisbikou, K. (1995). Characterisation of Ancient, Byzantine and Later Historic Mortars by Thermal and X-ray Diffraction TechniqueS . Thermochimicaca Acta, p.779 – 795.

DOI: 10.1016/0040-6031(95)02571-5

Google Scholar

[20] Franzini, F., Leoni, L. and Lezzerini, M. (2000).

Google Scholar

[21] Al-mukhtar, M. and Beck, K. (2005). Physical-Mechanical Characterization of Hydraulic and Non-Hydraulic Lime Based Mortars For a French Porous Limestone. 45071 Orléans Cedex 2, France: CNRS – CRMD.

Google Scholar

[22] Livingston, R. (1993). Materials Analysis of the Hagia Sophia Basilica. Structural Repair and Maintenance of Historic Buildings, Computational mechanics Publications, Volume II, pp.15-32.

Google Scholar

[23] Lindqvist, J.E. and Johansson, S. (2005). Sub-hydraulic Binders in Historic Mortars. International RILEM Workshop on Repair Mortars for Historic Masonry 2005 (pp. p.224 – 230). Italy: RILEM Proceedings Pro 67.

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4635-0_6

Google Scholar

[24] Wansom, S., Janjaturaphan, S. and Sinthupinyo, S. (2009). Pozzolanic Activity of Rice Husk Ash : Comparison of Various Electrical Methods. Journal of Metals, Materials and Minerals, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp.1-7.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.08.013

Google Scholar

[25] Moropoulou, A. B. (2001). The Effects of Limestone Characteristics and Calcinations Temperature to the Reactivity of Quicklime. Cement and Concrete Research, pp.633-639. Additional Readings.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(00)00490-7

Google Scholar

[1] Al-mukhtar, M. a. -M. -H. (1898). bbbb. 45071 Orléans Cedex 2, France, . : CNRS – CRMD.

Google Scholar

[2] Thomson, M, Lindqvist, J. E, Elsen, J. and Groot, C.J.W. P, (2004),. (2004). Porosity of Mortars" in "Characterization of Old Mortars with Respect to Repair,. (pp.75-105). italy: RILEM TC 167-COM.

DOI: 10.1617/14077

Google Scholar

[3] RILEM 167-COM, K. Van Balen, I. Papayianni, R. P.J. Van Hees, L. Binda. (2005). Characterisation of old mortars with respect to their repair. Materials and Structure, 38, 781-785.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02479291

Google Scholar

[4] Maurenbrecher, P. (2012). Requirements for Repointing Mortars for Historic Masonry. Repair Mortars for Historic Masonry, RILEM TC 203-RHM (pp.1303-1309). K. U LEUVEN: E &F.N. SPON.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-012-9849-7

Google Scholar

[5] Institution, B. S. (1992). BS 882: Specification for Aggregates from Natural Sources for Concrete. London: BSI.

Google Scholar

[6] Institution, B. S. (1998). BS EN 4551-2: Methods of Testing Mortars, Screeds and Plasters: Part 1. Chemical Analysis and Aggregate Grading, " (Vol. 2). London: BSI.

DOI: 10.3403/01392957

Google Scholar

[7] Institution, B. S. (1998). BS EN 4551-1: Methods of Testing Mortars, Screeds and Plasters: Part 1. Physical Testing, ",. London: BSI.

DOI: 10.3403/01240942u

Google Scholar

[8] Institution, B. S. (2000). BS EN 197-1: Cement: Part 1. Composition, Specification and Conformity Criteria for Common Cements. London: BSI.

Google Scholar

[9] Institution, B. S. (2002). BS EN 1015: Methods of Testing Mortars for Masonry. London: BSI.

Google Scholar

[10] Institution, B. S. (2010). BS EN 459-1: Building Lime: Part 1. Definition, Specification and Conformity. London: BSI.

Google Scholar

[11] Groot, C. (2012). RILEM TC 203: Repair Mortars for Historic Masonry: Performance Requirements for Renders and Plasters. Materials and Structures, 45, 1277-1285.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-012-9916-0

Google Scholar

[12] Elizabeth, S. G. (2004). Standard Practice for Determining the Components of Historic Cementitious Materials (Vols. Publication No. 2002-20. ). University of Delaware : National Center for Preservation Technology and Training.

Google Scholar

[13] Binda, L., Papayianni, I. and Toumbakari, E. and van Hees, R. P.J. (2004).

Google Scholar

[14] Çizer, Ö. (2004). Investigation of Lime Mortar Characteristics for the Conservation of the Ottoman Baths in Seferihisar-Urla Region, . Turkey: İzmir Institute of Technology.

Google Scholar

[15] Haule, E. (2012). " , ). Evaluating Earthquake Disaster Risk Management in Schools in Rungwe Volcanic Province in Tanzania. Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, Volume 4(1), Article 44.

DOI: 10.4102/jamba.v4i1.44

Google Scholar