Decline of Real Power Loss by the Combination of Ant Colony Optimization and Simulated Annealing Algorithm

Article Preview

Abstract:

Combination of ant colony optimization (ACO) algorithm and simulated annealing (SA) algorithm has been done to solve the reactive power problem.In this proposed combined algorithm (CA), the leads of parallel, collaborative and positive feedback of the ACO algorithm has been used to apply the global exploration in the current temperature. An adaptive modification threshold approach is used to progress the space exploration and balance the local exploitation. When the calculation process of the ACO algorithm falls into the inactivity, immediately SA algorithm is used to get a local optimal solution. Obtained finest solution of the ACO algorithm is considered as primary solution for SA algorithm, and then a fine exploration is executed in the neighborhood. Very importantly the probabilistic jumping property of the SA algorithm is used effectively to avoid solution falling into local optimum. The proposed combined algorithm (CA) approach has been tested in standard IEEE 30 bus test system and simulation results show obviously about the better performance of the proposed algorithm in reducing the real power loss with control variables within the limits.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

113-119

Citation:

Online since:

April 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Alsac. O and B. Scott, (1973) Optimal load flow with steady state security, IEEE Transaction. PAS , pp.745-751.

Google Scholar

[2] Lee K. Y , Paru Y. M, Oritz J. L, (1985) A united approach to optimal real and reactive power dispatch, , IEEE Transactions on power Apparatus and systems, PAS-104 : 1147-1153.

DOI: 10.1109/tpas.1985.323466

Google Scholar

[3] Monticelli. A,M.V. F Pereira , and S. Granville, (1987) Security constrained optimal power flow with post contingency corrective rescheduling, , IEEE Transactions on Power Systems : PWRS-2, No. 1, pp.175-182.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.1987.4335095

Google Scholar

[4] Deeb. N , ShahidehpurS. M, (1990) Linear reactive power optimization in a large power network using the decomposition approach, IEEE Transactions on power system, 5(2) : 428-435.

DOI: 10.1109/59.54549

Google Scholar

[5] Hobson. E, (1980), Network consrained reactive power control using linear programming, IEEE Transactions on power systems PAS -99 (4) , pp.868-877.

DOI: 10.1109/tpas.1980.319715

Google Scholar

[6] Lee .K. Y ,Y. M Park , and J. L Oritz, (1993) Fuel –cost optimization for both real and reactive power dispatches, , IEE Proc; 131C, (3), pp.85-93.

Google Scholar

[7] Mangoli.M. K and K.Y. Lee, (1993), Optimal real and reactive power control using linear programming, , Electr. PowerSyst. Res, Vol. 26, pp.1-10.

Google Scholar

[8] Canizares.C. A,A.C.Z. de Souza and V.H. Quintana , (1996) Comparison of performance indices for detection of proximity to voltage collapse , ', vol. 11. no. 3, pp.1441-1450.

DOI: 10.1109/59.535685

Google Scholar

[9] Berizzi.C. Bovo,M. Merlo, andM. Delfanti, (2012), A ga approach to compare orpf objective functions including secondary voltage regulation, Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 84, no. 1, p.187 – 194.

DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2011.11.014

Google Scholar

[10] Roy. P,S. Ghoshal, andS. Thakur, (2012).

Google Scholar

[11] Hu. Z,X. Wang, andG. Taylor, (2010), Stochastic optimal reactive power dispatch: Formulation and solution method, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 32, no. 6, p.615 – 621.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2009.11.018

Google Scholar

[12] Eleftherios I. Amoiralis, Pavlos S. Georgilakis, Marina A. Tsili, Antonios G. Kladas, (2010).

Google Scholar

[13] Dorigo. M and L. M. Gambardella, (1997) Ant colony system, a cooperative learning approach to the traveling salesman problem, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp.53-66.

DOI: 10.1109/4235.585892

Google Scholar

[14] Huiling Bao, (2015) A Two-Phase Hybrid Optimization Algorithm for Solving Complex Optimization Problems, (2015), International Journal of Smart Home Vol. 9, No. 10, pp.27-36.

DOI: 10.14257/ijsh.2015.9.10.04

Google Scholar

[15] Wu.Q. H,Y.J. Cao, andJ.Y. Wen, (1998), Optimal reactive power dispatch using an adaptive genetic algorithm, Int.J. Elect. Power Energy Syst. Vol 20. Pp. 563-569.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-0615(98)00016-7

Google Scholar

[16] Zhao. B,C.X. Guo, andY.J. CAO, (2005), Multiagent-based particle swarm optimization approach for optimal reactive power dispatch, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. Vol. 20, no. 2, pp.1070-1078.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2005.846064

Google Scholar

[17] Mahadevan. K, KannanP. S, (2010)Comprehensive Learning Particle Swarm Optimization for Reactive Power Dispatch, Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 10, No. 2, p.641–52.

DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2009.08.038

Google Scholar

[18] Khazali.A. H,M. Kalantar, (2011), Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch based on Harmony Search Algorithm, Electrical Power and Energy Systems, Vol. 33, No. 3, p.684–692.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2010.11.018

Google Scholar

[19] Sakthivel. S,M. Gayathri,V. Manimozhi, (2013), A Nature Inspired Optimization Algorithm for Reactive Power Control in a Power System, International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, p.29-33Vol. 2, Issue-1.

Google Scholar