Mathematical Simulation Methods to Evaluate the Effects of Actions on Conditional Preventive Maintenance of Complex Systems

Abstract:

In this work, we propose two mathematical simulation methods to evaluate the results of conditional preventive maintenance strategies based on controls and inspections with optimal performance. In order to have an optimal availability of the equipment in question, the evaluation of the maintenance strategies associated with the controls will be treated by the method of the fault trees based on the decision binary diagram with the calculation engine ALBIZIA. The maintenance performance associated with inspections will be determined by Petri networks coupled with the Monte Carlo method.

• Periodical: International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa (Volume 35)
• Pages: 38-59
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/JERA.35.38
• Online since: March 2018
• Authors: Youssef Saada*, E.M. Yahyaoui, Nadia Ouadoudi, Rachid Skouri, Abdelmajid Daya
• Keywords: Availability, Binary Decision Diagram, Complex System, Monte Carlo Method, Reliability

References

[1] Hongxia. L, Xian. C, Wei. L, Analysis on Influencing Factors of Emergency based on System Engineering, International Symposium on Emergency Management 2011, Systems Engineering Procedia 5 ( 2012 ) 15 – 20, Elsevier.

DOI: 10.1016/j.sepro.2012.04.003

[2] Lesobre. R, Modélisation et optimisation de la maintenance et de la surveillance des Systèmes multi-composants, thèse de l'université de Grenoble Alpes, (2015).

[3] Chouikhi. H, Optimisation des stratégies de maintenance verte pour les systèmes de production de biens et de services, thèse de l'université de Lorraine, 13 Décembre (2012).

[4] Mustapha. N, Eric. C, Nabil. N, Joint redundancy and imperfect preventive maintenance optimization for series–parallel multi-state degraded systems, Reliability Engineering and System Safety 103 (2012) 51–60.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2012.03.004

[5] Maryam.H, Ferenc.S, Miklos.S, New One Cycle Criteria for Optimizing Preventive Replacement Policies, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Reference: RESS5543, 10/04/(2016).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.04.010

[6] Mohammad. D, Farhad. K, Mahdi. D, A Reliability-based approach to optimize preventive maintenance scheduling for coherent systems, Reliability Engineering and System Safety 126 (2014) 98–106.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2014.01.010

[7] Pascual. R, Meruane. V, Rey. P. A, On the effect of downtime costs and budget constraint on preventive and replacement policies, Reliability Engineering and System Safety 93 (2008) 144–151.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.12.002

[8] Ross S.M., Introduction to probability models. Elsevier (2007), India, 9 edition. 11.

[9] Baranger. C, Mathiaud. J, Méthode de Monte-Carlo, http://wwwdfr.ensta.fr/Cours/docs/D11- 2/ cours Monte Carlo ENSTA.pdf, 2012/2013, Date of access23/06/(2015).

[10] Chabot. J, Dutuit. Y, Rauzy. A, De l'usage de la simulation de MONTE-CARLO couplée aux réseaux de PETRI en sureté de fonctionnement ,3e Conférence Francophone de Modélisation et Simulation, Avril 2001 – Troyes (France).

DOI: 10.4267/2042/56170

[11] Renault. E, Linard. A, Diagrammes de Décision Binaires, https:/www.Irde.epita.fr/~renault/teaching/imc/3-bdd.pdf ,Date of access14/07/(2016).

[12] Thomase. P, Manuel d'utilisation MOCA-RP 13.21Version 31 Mars (2014).

[13] Jean. H, pratique de la maintenance préventive, DUNOD ISBN 21000656010.

[14] Thales, manuel technique partie1 CVOR 431N°de référence 83130 55133.

[15] Valaei. M. R, Behnamian. J, Allocation and sequencing in 1-out-of-N heterogeneous cold-standby systems: Multi-objective harmony search with dynamic parameters tuning Reliability Engineering and System Safety 157(2017)78–86.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.08.022

[16] David. W, Cold-standby redundancy optimization for non-repairable systems IIE Transactions, 33:6, 471-478.

DOI: 10.1080/07408170108936846

[17] Megdiche. M, Sûreté de fonctionnement des réseaux de distribution en présence de production décentralisée, Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble - INPG, (2004).

[18] Feizabadi. M, Eshraghniaye Jahromi. A, A new model for reliability optimization of series-parallel systems with non-homogeneous components Reliability Engineering and System Safety 157 (2017) 101–112.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.08.023

[19] Eryilmaz. S, A reliability model for a three-state degraded system having random degradation rates Reliability Engineering and System Safety 156 (2016) 59–63.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.07.011

[20] Basu. A. P, El Mawaziny. A. H, Estimates of Reliability of k-Out-of-m Structures in the Independent Exponential Case, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 73, No. 364 (1978), pp.850-854.

DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1978.10480111

[21] Hajipour Y., Taghipour. S, Non-Periodic Inspection Optimization of Multi- Component and k-out-of-m Systems, Reliability Engineering and System Safety ,Reference: RESS5619, (2016).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.08.008

[22] Alaswad. S, Xiang. Y, A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system, Reliability Engineering and System Safety 157 (2017) 54–63.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.08.009