Sensitivity Analysis of Multiphase Flow in a well Using PROSPER

Article Preview

Abstract:

Pressure drop in a vertical or deviated borehole has been found to be due to hydrostatic changes and friction as a result of the produced fluids flowing to the surface. When oil flows upwards, the flowing pressure along the tubing string drops, and this makes gas to start liberating. Thus, multiphase flow forms in the tubing string. Hence, adequate modelling of vertical lift performance is required to predict the pressure drop and subsequently the wellbore pressure because many factors are involved [1]. In this work, sensitivity analysis of multiphase flow in a well has been carried out with the aid of PROSPER in which the most accurate correlation was chosen from twelve selected built-in correlations present in the program to predict the pressure drop via gradient matching. A sensitivity analysis of the well was further performed to investigate the parameters such as tubing diameter, gas-oil ratio and wellhead pressure that were affecting the vertical lift performance of a high water cut well. The results obtained from the correlation matching showed that Dun and Ros [2] original correlation was the best fit correlation for the well. The results of the sensitivity analysis revealed that reduction of wellhead pressure from 600 psi to 400 psi could increase liquid rate by 41%. An adjustment of wellhead pressure was found to give the most significant impact on the production rate of the well as compared to other two parameters studied.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

39-53

Citation:

Online since:

June 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] I. Ismail, L.T. Shern, A. Samsuri, M.S. Issham, L.H. Sid, N.H. Yusof, N.V. Boyou and Z. Zakaria. Determination of the best-fit multiphase flow correlation for high water-cut wells using PROSPER. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 80(3) (2018) 155–164.

DOI: 10.11113/jt.v80.11563

Google Scholar

[2] H. Duns Jr. and N.C.J. Ros. Vertical flow of gas and liquid mixtures in wells. 6th World Petroleum Congress, Frankfurt, Section II-Paper 22-PD6 ed, (1963).

Google Scholar

[3] Petroleum Experts, GAP User Manual, Multiphase Production Optimisation, (2003).

Google Scholar

[4] M. Golan and C. Whitson. Well Performance. Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Second Edition, (1995).

Google Scholar

[5] A.O. Gidado. Sensitivity Analysis of Multiphase Flow in a Well Using PROSPER. A Research Thesis Submitted to Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria, (2019).

DOI: 10.29252/arakmu.10.5.17

Google Scholar

[6] A. Saltelli, M. Ratto, T. Andres, F. Campologo, J. Cariboni, D. Gatelli, M. Saisana and S. Tarantola. Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer. John Wiley and Sons, (2008).

DOI: 10.1002/9780470725184

Google Scholar

[7] J.K. Pucknell, J.N. Manson and E.G. Vervest. An evaluation of recent mechanistic models of multiphase flow for predicting pressure drop in oil and gas wells. Aberdeen: offshore European Conference, (1993).

DOI: 10.2118/26682-ms

Google Scholar

[8] A.U. Yahaya and A.A. Gahtani. A comparative study between empirical correlations and mechanical model of vertical multiphase flow. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE-136931-MS (2010) 1-8.

DOI: 10.2118/136931-ms

Google Scholar

[9] Petroleum Experts. GAP User Manual, Multiphase Production Optimisation, (2010).

Google Scholar

[10] A. Kerunwa and S.O. Arharhire. Modelling well performance in Niger Delta reservoir using tuned vertical lift performance (VLP) correlation. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 3(3) (2017) 387-391.

Google Scholar

[11] S. Al-Lawati. Gas-lift nodal analysis model - economical optimization approach. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Supplementary/SPE-171345 (2014) 1-11.

DOI: 10.2118/171345-ms

Google Scholar

[12] I.E. Tetoros. Design of a Continuous Gas Lift System to Initiate Production in a Dead Well. MSc Thesis submitted to Technical University of Crete, (2015).

Google Scholar

[13] J.V. Vogel. Inflow performance relationships for solution-gas drive wells. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 20(1) (1968) 83–92.

DOI: 10.2118/1476-pa

Google Scholar

[14] O. Fevang, M.G. Foossmark, K.N. Kulkarni, H.T. Lauritsen and S.M. Skjaeveland. Vertical lift models. Denmark: EAGE Annual conference & Exhibition Copenhage, (2012).

Google Scholar

[15] J. Orkiszewski. Predicting two-phase pressure drop in vertical pipe. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 19(06) (1967) 829–838.

DOI: 10.2118/1546-pa

Google Scholar