Welding Defects Detection in Radiographic Images Using an Improved Denoising Technique Combined with an Enhanced Chan-Vese Model

Article Preview

Abstract:

The detection of welding defects is becoming an important operation in the industry and the field of non-destructive testing. Among the most used techniques in the detection of weld defects, it is radiography. The radiographic images acquired are generally of low contrast, poor quality, and uneven lighting. Therefore, the detection of welding defects becomes a difficult task. In this work, a new hybrid approach based on the combination of several techniques is proposed. It consists of three stages: firstly, we define the region of interest (ROI). Secondly, a preprocessing operation based on an improved version of denoising by soft thresholding of wavelet coefficients and an optimized threshold is applied to improve the image quality (noise reduction, contrast enhancement). Thirdly, an enhanced Chan-Vese model is proposed to segment the denoised ROI region. This enhanced model is based on the choice of a cluster obtained by the Fuzzy C-Mean algorithm (FCM) as the initial contour. The proposed approach is applied to the various radiographic welding images from the GDxray database to extract the characteristics of the welding defects. The results obtained clearly show the effectiveness of the proposed approach compared to conventional techniques.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

155-172

Citation:

Online since:

May 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A.Suaila, I. M. Idris, M.Yupiter, Weld defect Features Extraction on Digital Radiographic Image using Chan-Vese Model, IEEE 9th International Colloquim on signal and its Application, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, (2013) 67-72.

DOI: 10.1109/cspa.2013.6530016

Google Scholar

[2] M.Sundaram, J.Prabin, G.Jaffino, Weld in Defects Extraction for radiographic images using C-means segmentation method, IEEE International conference on communication and network technologies, Sivakasi, India, (2014) 79-83.

DOI: 10.1109/cnt.2014.7062729

Google Scholar

[3] N. Chetih, N. Ramou, Z .Messali A.Serir, Y. Boutiche, Micrographic image segmentation using level set model based on possibilistic C-Means clustering, IEEE European conference on electrical engineering and computer science, Bern, Switzerland, (2017) 188-192.

DOI: 10.1109/eecs.2017.43

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Boutiche, Local segmentation via an implicit region-based deformable model applied to weld defects extraction, International Journal of Computer and Information Technology. 2(4) (2013) 815-820.

Google Scholar

[5] N. Ramou, Segmentation of Weld Defects Using Multiphase Level Set by the Piecewise-Smooth Mumford-Shah Model, Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing. 55(2) (2019) 155–161.

DOI: 10.1134/s1061830919020074

Google Scholar

[6] E Yahaghi, The detection of weld defect images using shape-from-shading and wavelet denoising methods, Insight-Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring. 56(6) (2014) 308-311.

DOI: 10.1784/insi.2014.56.6.308

Google Scholar

[7] E. Yahaghi, M. Mirzapour, A. Movafeghi, B. Rokrok, Interlaced bilateral filtering and wavelet thresholding for flaw detection in the radiography of weldments, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135, 42 (2020).

DOI: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00119-y

Google Scholar

[8] H. Jiang, R. Wang, Z. Gao, J. Gao, H. Wang, Classification of weld defects based on the analytical hierarchy process and Dempster–Shafer evidence theory. J Intell Manuf 30 (4) (2019) 2013–(2024).

DOI: 10.1007/s10845-017-1369-4

Google Scholar

[9] H. Zhu, W. Ge, Z Liu, Deep Learning-Based Classification of Weld Surface Defects, Appl. Sci., 9 (16) (2019) 3312.

Google Scholar

[10] J. Zapata, R. Vilar, R. Ruiz, Performance evaluation of an automatic inspection system of weld defects in radiographic images based on neuro-classifiers, Expert Syst. Appl. 38(7) (2011) 8812–8824.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.092

Google Scholar

[11] J. Kumar, R.S. Anand, S.P. Srivastava, Flaws classification using ANN for radiographic weld images, IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN), Noida, India, (2014)145-150.

DOI: 10.1109/spin.2014.6776938

Google Scholar

[12] R. Vilar, J. Zapata, R. Ruiz, An automatic system of classification of weld defects in radiographic images, NDT E International. 42(5) (2009) 467–476.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.02.004

Google Scholar

[13] M.Barstugan, Y.S. Ceran, M. Yilmaz and N.A. Dundar, Detection of Defects on Single-Bead Welding by Machine Learning Methods, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 895(1) (2020).

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/895/1/012012

Google Scholar

[14] W. Khalifa, O. Abouelatta, E. Gadelmawla, I. Elewa, Classification of Welding Defects Using Gray Level Histogram Techniques via Neural Network, Mansoura Engineering Journal. 39(4) (2014) 1-13.

DOI: 10.21608/bfemu.2020.102839

Google Scholar

[15] D. Mery, M. A. Berti, Automatic detection of welding defects using texture features, Insight-Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring 45(10) (2003) 676-681.

DOI: 10.1784/insi.45.10.676.52952

Google Scholar

[16] D. Mery, R.R. da Silva, L.P. Calôba, and J. Rebello, Pattern recognition in the automatic inspection of aluminum castings, In Insight-Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, 45 (7) (2003) 475-483.

DOI: 10.1784/insi.45.7.475.54452

Google Scholar

[17] J. Fang, K. Wang, Weld Pool Image Segmentation of Hump Formation Based on Fuzzy C-Means and Chan-Vese Model, J. of Materi Eng and Perform. 28 (2019) 4467–4476.

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-019-04168-y

Google Scholar

[18] H. Pan, W. Liu, L. Li, G. Zhou, A novel level set approach for image segmentation with landmark constraints, Optik. 182 (2019) 257–268.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.01.009

Google Scholar

[19] T. Chan, L. Vese, An Active Contour Model without Edges, IEEE Trans. Image Processing. 10 (2) (2001) 266-277.

DOI: 10.1109/83.902291

Google Scholar

[20] L.A. Vese, T.F. Chan, A Multiphase Level Set Framework for Image Segmentation Using the Mumford–Shah Model, International Journal of Computer Vision 50(3) (2002) 271-293.

Google Scholar

[21] D. Mumford, J. Shah, Optimal approximations by piecewise smooth functions and associated variational problems, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics. 42(5) (1989) 577-685.

DOI: 10.1002/cpa.3160420503

Google Scholar

[22] G. Chang, B. Yu, and M. Vetterli, Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 9 (9) (2000) 1532–1546.

DOI: 10.1109/83.862633

Google Scholar

[23] J. C. Dunn, A Fuzzy Relative of the ISODATA Process and its Use in Detecting Compact Well-Separated Clusters, Journal of Cybernetics 3(3) (1973) 32-57.

DOI: 10.1080/01969727308546046

Google Scholar

[24] J.C. Bezdek, Objective function clustering, in Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms, Springer, Boston, MA, 1981, pp.43-93.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-0450-1_3

Google Scholar

[25] Information on https://domingomery.ing.puc.cl/material/gdxray/.

Google Scholar

[26] N.D.H. Thanh, D. Sergey, V.B.S. Prasath, N.H. Hai, Blood vessels Segmentation method for retinal fundus images based on adaptive principal curvature and image derivative operators, International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences, Moscow, Russia (2019).

DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-2-w12-211-2019

Google Scholar

[27] G. Csurka, D. Larlus, F. Perronnin, and F. Meylan, What is a good evaluation measure for semantic segmentation?, BMVC, 27 (2013).

DOI: 10.5244/c.27.32

Google Scholar