Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Fluidized Bed Hydrodynamics at Elevated Temperatures

Abstract:

Fluidized bed gasifiers operate at elevated temperatures, and experimental measurements for the hydrodynamic parameters at high temperatures are difficult and time consuming, making computational fluid dynamics simulation useful for such investigation. In this study, Opensource computational fluid dynamics code, OpenFOAM, was used to investigate temperature effect on the fluidized bed hydrodynamics on a 3D fluidized bed model using Eulerian-Eulerian approach. Silica sand of particle sizes of 500, 335 and 233 𝜇m was used as the bed materials under temperatures between 25 and 400 °C. To validate the simulation model, a laboratory scale fluidized bed unit was used to conduct experiments for the same range of temperature and sand particle sizes. The results revealed that the temperature of the bed materials greatly affect fluidized bed hydrodynamics. The minimum fluidization velocity increased with the sand particle diameter but decreased with the temperature. On the other hand, the bed porosity at the minimum fluidization point increased marginally with both the temperature and the particle size of the bed materials. Further analysis showed that the expanded bed height increased with the temperature for a specific superficial velocity while the bubbles grew in size with both the air flow rates and the temperature. The numerical model results were compared with the experimental results based on minimum fluidization velocity, bed porosity and pressure drop at the minimum fluidization point. The hydrodynamic results of the numerical model were in good agreement with the experimental results.

• Periodical: International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa (Volume 64)
• Pages: 51-70
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-a41tm2
• Online since: June 2023
• Authors: Fredrick Njuguna*, Hiram Ndiritu, Benson Gathitu, Meshack Hawi, Jotham Munyalo
• Keywords: Computational Fluid Dynamics, Fluidized Bed Hydrodynamics, Gasifier, OpenFOAM

References

[1] S. Janet L., R. Jay, and S. Freyr, Renewables 2018-Global status report. A comprehensive annual overview of the state of renewable energy. Advancing the global renewable energy transition-Highlights of the REN21 Renewables 2018 Global Status Report in perspective. (2018).

DOI: 10.3390/resources8030139

[2] K. Sasujit, N. Homdoung, and N. Tippayawong, Production of Producer Gas from Densified Agricultural Biomass in Downdraft Gasifier and Its Application to Small Diesel Engines, Energy Eng. 119 (2022) 2150-2167.

DOI: 10.32604/ee.2022.022069

[3] A. Al-Farraji and H. Taofeeq, Effect of elevated temperature and silica sand particle size on minimum fluidization velocity in an atmospheric bubbling fluidized bed, Chinese J. Chem. Eng. 28 (2020) 2985–2992

DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2020.07.054

[4] A. Ghaly, A. Ergudenler, and V. Ramakrishnan, Effect of Distributor Plate Configuration on Pressure Drop in a Bubbling Fluidized Bed Reactor, Adv. Res. 3 (2015) 251–268.

DOI: 10.9734/air/2015/8240

[5] Y.M. Chang, C. M. Chou, K. T. Su, C. Y. Hung, and C. H. Wu, Elutriation characteristics of fine particles from bubbling fluidized bed incineration for sludge cake treatment, Waste Manag. 25 (2005) 249–263.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2004.08.013

[6] D. Mandal, D. Sathiyamoorthy, and M. Vinjamur, Void fraction and effective thermal conductivity of binary particulate bed, Fusion Eng. Des. 88 (2013) 216–225.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.02.033

[7] M. Rasteh, F. Farhadi, and G. Ahmadi, Empirical models for minimum fluidization velocity of particles with different size distribution in tapered fluidized beds, Powder Technol. 338, (2018) 563–575.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.07.077

[8] R. Chirone, M. Poletto, D. Barletta, and P. Lettieri, The effect of temperature on the minimum fluidization conditions of industrial cohesive particles, Powder Technol. 362 (2020) 307–322.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.11.102

[9] Y. Shao, J. Gu, W. Zhong, and A. Yu, Determination of minimum fluidization velocity in fluidized bed at elevated pressures and temperatures using CFD simulations, Powder Technol. 350 (2019) 81–90.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.03.039

[10] S. Gosavi, N. Kulkarni, C. S. Mathpati, and D. Mandal, CFD modeling to determine the minimum fluidization velocity of particles in gas-solid fluidized bed at different temperatures, Powder Technol. 327 (2018) 109–119.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2017.12.026

[11] S. Shrestha, J. Q. Gan, and Z. Y. Zhou, Micromechanical analysis of bubbles formed in fluidized beds operated with a continuous single jet, Powder Technol. 357 (2019) 398–407.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.08.091

[12] R. Issaoui and L. Ben Mansour, Experimental study of temperature effects on bubble characteristics and gas holdup in electroflotation column, Desalin. Water Treat. 162 (2019) 186-192.

DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2019.24407

[13] N. Nemati, R. Zarghami, and N. Mostoufi, Investigation of Hydrodynamics of High-Temperature Fluidized Beds by Pressure Fluctuations, Chem. Eng. Technol. 39 (2016) 1527–1536.

DOI: 10.1002/ceat.201500443

[14] H. Zhou, H. Gao, Z. Fang, J. Yang, and M. Wu, Analysis of Gas-Solid Flow Characteristics in a Spouted Fluidized Bed Dryer by Means of Computational Particle Fluid Dynamics, Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing. 16 (2020) 813-826

DOI: 10.32604/fdmp.2020.010150

[15] U. Kumar and V. K. Agarwal, Simulation of 3D gas–solid fluidized bed reactor hydrodynamics, Part. Sci. Technol. 35 (2017) 1–13.

DOI: 10.1080/02726351.2015.1119227

[16] C. Loha, H. Chattopadhyay, and P. K. Chatterjee, Euler-Euler CFD modeling of fluidized bed: Influence of specularity coefficient on hydrodynamic behavior, Particuology, 11 (2013) 673–680.

DOI: 10.1016/j.partic.2012.08.007

[17] Y. Behjat, S. Shahhosseini, and S. H. Hashemabadi, CFD modeling of hydrodynamic and heat transfer in fluidized bed reactors, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 35 (2008) 357–368.

DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2007.09.011

[18] S. I. Ngo, Y. Il Lim, D. Lee, and M. W. Seo, Flow behavior and heat transfer in bubbling fluidized-bed with immersed heat exchange tubes for CO2 methanation, Powder Technol. 380 (2021) 462–474.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2020.11.027

[19] N. Xie, F. Battaglia, and S. Pannala, Effects of using two- versus three-dimensional computational modeling of fluidized beds. Part I, hydrodynamics, Powder Technol. 182 (2008) 1–13.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2007.07.005

[20] J. Chang, G. Wang, J. Gao, K. Zhang, H. Chen, and Y. Yang, CFD modeling of particle – particle heat transfer in dense gas-solid fl uidized beds of binary mixture, Powder Technol. 217 (2012) 50–60.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2011.10.008

[21] Z. Fu, J. Zhu, S. Barghi, Y. Zhao, Z. Luo, and C. Duan, Minimum fluidization velocity of binary mixtures of medium particles in the air dense medium fluidized bed, Chem. Eng. Sci. 207 (2019) 194–201.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2019.06.005

[22] A. Al-Akaishi, A. Valera-Medina, C. T. Chong, and R. Marsh, CFD Analysis of the Fluidised Bed Hydrodynamic Behaviour inside an Isothermal Gasifier with different Perforated Plate Distributors, in Energy Procedia. 142 (2017) 835–840.

DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.134

[23] D. A. Dos Santos, S. Baluni, and A. Bück, Eulerian multiphase simulation of the particle dynamics in a fluidized bed opposed gas jet mill, Processes. 8 (2020) 1–19.

DOI: 10.3390/pr8121621

[24] W. Rong et al., Numerical study of the solid flow behavior in a rotating drum based on a multiphase CFD model accounting for solid frictional viscosity and wall friction, Powder Technol. 361 (2020) 87–98.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.10.034

[25] W. Rong et al., Numerical study of the solid flow behavior in a rotating drum based on a multiphase CFD model accounting for solid frictional viscosity and wall friction, Powder Technol. 361 (2020) 87–98.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.10.034

[26] F. Marchelli, Q. Hou, B. Bosio, E. Arato, and A. Yu, Comparison of different drag models in CFD-DEM simulations of spouted beds, Powder Technol. 360 (2020) 1253–1270.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.10.058

[27] V.H. Bhusare, M.K. Dhiman, D.V. Kalaga, S. Roy, and J.B. Joshi, CFD simulations of a bubble column with and without internals by using OpenFOAM, Chem. Eng. J. 317 (2017) 157–174.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.01.128

[28] C. Loha, H. Chattopadhyay, and P. K. Chatterjee, Effect of coefficient of restitution in Euler-Euler CFD simulation of fluidized-bed hydrodynamics, Particuology. 15(2014) 170–177.

DOI: 10.1016/j.partic.2013.07.001

[29] I. Eslami Afrooz, C.M. Sinnathambi, S. Karuppanan, D. Ling, and C. Ching, CFD Simulation of Bubbling Fluidized Bed: Effect of Distributor Plate Orifice Pattern Configuration on Hydrodynamics of Gas-Solid Mixing, Eng. and Applied Sci. 11 (2016) 11954-11959.

DOI: 10.1002/mawe.201600761

[30] F. Alobaid et al., Progress in CFD Simulations of Fluidized Beds for Chemical and Energy Process Engineering, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.p.91 (2022).

[31] D. Escudero and T.J. Heindel, Bed height and material density effects on fluidized bed hydrodynamics, Chem. Eng. Sci. 66 (2011) 3648–3655.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2011.04.036

[32] N.J. Kulkarni, C.S. Mathpati, D. Mandal, and V. H. Dalvi, Minimum Fluidization Velocity of Intermediate Sized Particles in Conventional and Packed Fluidized Bed, Int. J. Chem. React. Eng. 17 (2019).

DOI: 10.1515/ijcre-2018-0321

[33] S. Shukrullah, M. A. Javed, M. Y. Naz, Y. Khan, M. A. S. Alkanhal, and H. Anwar, PIV and statistical analysis of a swirling bed process carried out using a hybrid model of axial blade distributor, Processes. 7 (2019).

DOI: 10.3390/pr7100697