The Role of Gold Nanoparticles in Sonosensitization of Human Cervical Carcinoma Cell Line under Ultrasound Irradiation: An In Vitro Study

Article Preview

Abstract:

Abstract:Purpose: The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the combined effects of ultrasound irradiation as a non-invasive and non-ionizing radiation with gold nanoparticles as ultrasound sensitizers on the HeLa cells.Materials and Methods: First, Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) were prepared, and the characterizations of nanoparticles were analyzed using TEM and UV-vis. Different concentrations of nanoparticles (0.2, 1, 5, 25 and 50 μg/ml) were used. Then, cytotoxicity of the GNPs was studied on HeLa cells, and finally concentrations of 0.2, 1 and 5 µg/mL were chosen for supplementary studies. The effects of nanoparticles and ultrasound irradiation with different intensities (0.5, 1 and 1.5 W/cm2) as well as the combination of ultrasound radiation with various concentrations of nanoparticles on 24, 48 and 72 h post-experiment cells’ viability were estimated by MTT and trypan blue assay.Results: Results showed that the sonosensitizing effect of nanoparticles mainly depended on the intensity of ultrasound waves and the concentration of GNPs. By increasing the concentration of GNPs and ultrasound intensity, the nanoparticle's effect of sensitizer was also increased. Moreover, as expected, the highest effect was observed at the highest intensities (1.5 W/cm2) of ultrasound wave and high concentrations (5 μg/ml) of GNPs 72 h after exposure to ultrasound irradiation.Conclusions: It is revealed that GNPs can be used as sonosensitizers of HeLa cells to ultrasound irradiation in order to produce an efficient treatment.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1-14

Citation:

Online since:

August 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 66 (2016) 7–30.

Google Scholar

[2] Halperin EC, Brady LW, Wazer DE, Perez CA Perez & Brady's principles and practice of radiation oncology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Google Scholar

[3] Chen H, Zhou X, Gao Y, et al Recent progress in development of new sonosensitizers for sonodynamic cancer therapy. Drug Discov Today. 19 (2014) 502–509.

DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.01.010

Google Scholar

[4] Shen S, Wu L, Liu J, et al Core–shell structured Fe3O4@ TiO2-doxorubicin nanoparticles for targeted chemo-sonodynamic therapy of cancer. Int J Pharm. 486 (2015) 380–388.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.03.070

Google Scholar

[5] Beik J, Abed Z, Shakeri-Zadeh A, et al Evaluation of the sonosensitizing properties of nano-graphene oxide in comparison with iron oxide and gold nanoparticles. Phys E Low-dimensional Syst Nanostructures. 81 (2016) 308–314.

DOI: 10.1016/j.physe.2016.03.023

Google Scholar

[6] Rosenthal I, Sostaric JZ, Riesz P Sonodynamic therapy––a review of the synergistic effects of drugs and ultrasound. Ultrason Sonochem. 11 (2004) 349–363.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2004.03.004

Google Scholar

[7] Barati AH, Mokhtari-Dizaji M Ultrasound dose fractionation in sonodynamic therapy. Ultrasound Med Biol. 36 (2010) 880–887.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.03.010

Google Scholar

[8] Trendowski M The promise of sonodynamic therapy. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 33 (2014) 143–160.

DOI: 10.1007/s10555-013-9461-5

Google Scholar

[9] Canavese G, Ancona A, Racca L, et al Nanoparticle-assisted ultrasound: A special focus on sonodynamic therapy against cancer. Chem Eng J. 340 (2018) 155–172.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.01.060

Google Scholar

[10] Harada Y, Ogawa K, Irie Y, et al Ultrasound activation of TiO2 in melanoma tumors. J Control Release. 149 (2011) 190–195.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.10.012

Google Scholar

[11] Wan G-Y, Liu Y, Chen B-W, et al Recent advances of sonodynamic therapy in cancer treatment. Cancer Biol Med. 13 (2016) 325.

Google Scholar

[12] Baghbani F, Chegeni M, Moztarzadeh F, et al Ultrasonic nanotherapy of breast cancer using novel ultrasound-responsive alginate-shelled perfluorohexane nanodroplets: In vitro and in vivo evaluation. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 77 (2017) 698–707.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.017

Google Scholar

[13] Xu H, Zhang X, Han R, et al Nanoparticles in sonodynamic therapy: state of the art review. RSC Adv. 6 (2016) 50697–50705.

DOI: 10.1039/c6ra06862f

Google Scholar

[14] Maeda H The enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect in tumor vasculature: the key role of tumor-selective macromolecular drug targeting. Adv Enzyme Regul. 41 (2001) 189–207.

DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2571(00)00013-3

Google Scholar

[15] Fakhimikabir H, Tavakoli MB, Zarrabi A, et al The role of folic acid-conjugated polyglycerol coated iron oxide nanoparticles on radiosensitivity with clinical electron beam (6 MeV) on human cervical carcinoma cell line: In vitro study. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol. 182 (2018) 71–76.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.03.023

Google Scholar

[16] Khoei S, Mahdavi SR, Fakhimikabir H, et al The role of iron oxide nanoparticles in the radiosensitization of human prostate carcinoma cell line DU145 at megavoltage radiation energies. Int J Radiat Biol. 90 (2014) 351–356.

DOI: 10.3109/09553002.2014.888104

Google Scholar

[17] Fakhimikabir H, Tavakoli MB, Zarrabi A, et al Could FA-PG-SPIONs act as a hyperthermia sensitizing agent? An in vitro study. J Therm Biol. 78 (2018) 73–83.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2018.09.010

Google Scholar

[18] Pan X, Wang H, Wang S, et al Sonodynamic therapy (SDT): a novel strategy for cancer nanotheranostics. Sci China Life Sci. (2018) 1–12.

DOI: 10.1007/s11427-017-9262-x

Google Scholar

[19] Shanei A, Mahdi M, Shanei MM Effect of gold nanoparticle size on acoustic cavitation using chemical dosimetry method. Ultrason Sonochem. 34 (2017) 45–50.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.05.010

Google Scholar

[20] Kennedy LC, Bickford LR, Lewinski NA, et al A new era for cancer treatment: gold‐nanoparticle‐mediated thermal therapies. Small. 7 (2011) 169–183.

DOI: 10.1002/smll.201000134

Google Scholar

[21] Shanei A, Sazgarnia A, Tayyebi Meibodi N, et al Sonodynamic therapy using protoporphyrin IX conjugated to gold nanoparticles: an in vivo study on a colon tumor model. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 15 (2012) 759–767.

Google Scholar

[22] Eshghi H, Sazgarnia A, Rahimizadeh M, et al Protoporphyrin IX–gold nanoparticle conjugates as an efficient photosensitizer in cervical cancer therapy. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 10 (2013) 304–312.

DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2013.02.003

Google Scholar

[23] Grabar KC, Freeman RG, Hommer MB, Natan MJ Preparation and characterization of Au colloid monolayers. Anal Chem. 67 (1995) 735–743.

DOI: 10.1021/ac00100a008

Google Scholar

[24] Sazgarnia A, Shanei A, Taheri AR, et al Therapeutic effects of acoustic cavitation in the presence of gold nanoparticles on a colon tumor model. J Ultrasound Med. 32 (2013) 475–483.

DOI: 10.7863/jum.2013.32.3.475

Google Scholar

[25] Sazgarnia A, Shanei A, Meibodi NT, et al A Novel Nanosonosensitizer for Sonodynamic Therapy. J Ultrasound Med. 30 (2011) 1321–1329.

DOI: 10.7863/jum.2011.30.10.1321

Google Scholar

[26] Khoshgard K, Hashemi B, Arbabi A, et al Radiosensitization effect of folate-conjugated gold nanoparticles on HeLa cancer cells under orthovoltage superficial radiotherapy techniques. Phys Med Biol. 59 (2014) 2249–2263.

DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/9/2249

Google Scholar

[27] Geng F, Song K, Xing JZ, et al Thio-glucose bound gold nanoparticles enhance radio-cytotoxic targeting of ovarian cancer. Nanotechnology. 22 (2011) 285101.

DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/22/28/285101

Google Scholar

[28] Liu Y, Liu X, Jin X, et al The dependence of radiation enhancement effect on the concentration of gold nanoparticles exposed to low-and high-LET radiations. Phys Medica. 31 (2015) 210–218.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.01.006

Google Scholar

[29] Patra HK, Banerjee S, Chaudhuri U, et al Cell selective response to gold nanoparticles. Nanomedicine Nanotechnology, Biol Med. 3 (2007) 111–119.

DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2007.03.005

Google Scholar

[30] Pan Y, Neuss S, Leifert A, et al Size‐dependent cytotoxicity of gold nanoparticles. Small. 3 (2007) 1941–(1949).

DOI: 10.1002/smll.200700378

Google Scholar

[31] Kang B, Mackey MA, El-Sayed MA Nuclear targeting of gold nanoparticles in cancer cells induces DNA damage, causing cytokinesis arrest and apoptosis. J Am Chem Soc. 132 (2010) 1517–1519.

DOI: 10.1021/ja9102698

Google Scholar

[32] Yamaguchi S, Kobayashi H, Narita T, et al Sonodynamic therapy using water-dispersed TiO2-polyethylene glycol compound on glioma cells: Comparison of cytotoxic mechanism with photodynamic therapy. Ultrason Sonochem. 18 (2011) 1197–1204.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.12.017

Google Scholar

[33] Liang L, Xie S, Jiang L, et al The combined effects of hematoporphyrin monomethyl ether-SDT and doxorubicin on the proliferation of QBC939 cell lines. Ultrasound Med Biol. 39 (2013) 146–160.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.08.017

Google Scholar

[34] Holland CK, Apfel RE Thresholds for transient cavitation produced by pulsed ultrasound in a controlled nuclei environment. J Acoust Soc Am. 88 (1990) 2059–(2069).

DOI: 10.1121/1.400102

Google Scholar

[35] Brazzale C, Canaparo R, Racca L, et al Enhanced selective sonosensitizing efficacy of ultrasound-based anticancer treatment by targeted gold nanoparticles. Nanomedicine. 11 (2016) 3053–3070.

DOI: 10.2217/nnm-2016-0293

Google Scholar

[36] Kosheleva OK, Lai T-C, Chen NG, et al Selective killing of cancer cells by nanoparticle-assisted ultrasound. J Nanobiotechnology. 14 (2016) 46.

DOI: 10.1186/s12951-016-0194-9

Google Scholar