A Study on the Influence of Metal Sheet Enclosure on Temperature Uniformity in FDM Printing Environments

Article Preview

Abstract:

For fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing, maintaining consistent local ambient temperature is critical to prevent warping, poor layer adhesion, and dimensional errors. This study investigated the efficacy of a metal sheet enclosure in preserving thermal uniformity during FDM printing, addressing the limited information on metal enclosures' performance. Experiments were conducted using ABS filament on a Creality Ender 3 Pro, comparing an open-frame setup with a custom 500x600x620mm metal sheet enclosure. Results show the metal enclosure significantly enhanced thermal stability. The open-frame setup exhibited unstable temperatures, fluctuating from a peak of 58.0°C to 36°C, averaging 49.5°C. Conversely, the metal enclosure maintained a stable plateau between 65-67°C for most of the print, reaching a peak of 72.0°C and averaging 63.0°C. Qualitatively, open-frame prints displayed surface cracking and suboptimal layer adhesion, while enclosed prints showed markedly improved surface finish with no visible cracks and smoother layers. The metal enclosure acts as a thermal buffer, mitigating environmental changes and convective heat loss, thus improving print quality and reliability by ensuring thermal consistency in FDM 3D printing.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] U.M. Dilberoglu, B. Gharehpapagh, U. Yaman, and M. Dolen, The Role of Additive Manufacturing in the Era of Industry 4.0, Procedia Manuf., 2017.

DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.148

Google Scholar

[2] O. A. Mohamed, S. H. Masood, and J. L. Bhowmik,Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects,Adv. Manuf., 2015.

DOI: 10.1007/s40436-014-0097-7

Google Scholar

[3] R. Manghnani, "An Exploratory Study: The impact of Additive Manufacturing on the Automobile Industry," Int. J. Curr. Eng. Technol., vol. 5, no. 5, p.3407–3410, 2015.

Google Scholar

[4] S. Huajun, Internal constant temperature system of 3D printer,2016.

Google Scholar

[5] S.H. Bong, B. Nematollahi, A. Nazari, M. Xia, and J. Sanjayan, Method of Optimisation for Ambient Temperature Cured Sustainable Geopolymers for 3D Printing Construction Applications,Materials (Basel)., vol. 12, no. 6, 2019.

DOI: 10.3390/ma12060902

Google Scholar

[6] J.M. Gardner, C.J. Stelter, E.A. Yashin, and E.J. Siochi,High Temperature Thermoplastic Additive Manufacturing Using Low-Cost, Open-Source Hardware,2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.sti.nasa.gov.

Google Scholar

[7] T. May, B. Eslami, and K. Fouladi, Optimization of 3D printer enclosure environment,Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 118, p.2233–2246, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:236417102.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-021-08034-x

Google Scholar

[8] M. Li, "Multifunctional integrated 3D printing building enclosure wall." 2019.

Google Scholar

[9] A. Kholil, E.A. Syaefudin, A. Juniar, M.K. Rohim, and S.T. Dwiyati, Simulation of temperature distribution in 3D printing heated chamber on orientation and temperature variations with ABS material,vol. 2596, 2023.

DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/2596/1/012007

Google Scholar

[10] R.H. Kingston, "Chapter 2 - Interaction of Radiation with Matter: Absorption, Emission, and Lasers," in Optics and Photonics, R. H. B. T.-O. S. Kingston Detectors, and Systems, Ed. Burlington: Academic Press, 1995, p.33–47.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-012408655-5/50003-2

Google Scholar