3D-Printed Protective Button Covers for Technical Devices

Article Preview

Abstract:

Protective foils for buttons fabricated using 3D printing with TPU (Thermoplastic Polyurethane) material offer innovative solutions for enhancing durability, functionality, and user experience in various applications. TPU, known for its elasticity, abrasion resistance, and transparency, is ideal for creating thin, flexible foils that shield buttons from wear, moisture, and contaminants while maintaining tactile feedback. The 3D printing process allows for precise customization, enabling the production of foils that fit specific button designs with high accuracy. This approach is particularly beneficial in sectors like consumer electronics, automotive, and industrial equipment, where buttons are subject to frequent use and harsh conditions. Moreover, TPU's resilience ensures long-lasting protection without compromising the aesthetic or ergonomic qualities of the buttons. The integration of 3D printing technology facilitates rapid prototyping and production, allowing for quick iterations and tailored solutions to meet diverse protective needs. Overall, the use of TPU in 3D-printed protective foils represents a significant advancement in the design and manufacture of durable, high-performance button covers.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

55-64

Citation:

Online since:

November 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] 3D LifePrints UK Ltd (2020). Medical 3D Printing at the Point of Care - Improving Patient Outcomes With 3D Technologies.

Google Scholar

[2] Parikh, H.H., Jadav, R., Joshi, P. (2023). 3-D Printing: A Review of Manufacturing Methods, Materials, Scope and Challenges, and Applications.

Google Scholar

[3] Vallejo, D.O., Aroca, I., Lara, P., Paguay, A. (2024). Mechanical Testing and Durability Evaluation of 3D Printed Magnetic Closures for Adaptive Fashion.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-63437-6_1

Google Scholar

[4] https: //www.wevolver.com/article/how-3d-printing-is-enabling-faster-design-higher-productivity-and-more-customization-in-manufacturing.

Google Scholar

[5] https://oxmaint.com/blog/post/5-causes-of-equipment-failure.

Google Scholar

[6] Aramide, B.P., Popoola, A.P.I., Sadiku, E.R., Aramide, F.O., Jamiru, T., Pityana, S.L. (2021). Wear-resistant metals and Composites.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-36268-3_177

Google Scholar

[7] https://limblecmms.com/blog/equipment-failure/.

Google Scholar

[8] Matos, M.A., Rocha, A.M.A.C. & Costa, L.A. Many-objective optimization of build part orientation in additive manufacturing.

Google Scholar

[9] Bertling, J., Rommel, S. (2016). A Critical View of 3D Printing Regarding Industrial Mass Customization Versus Individual Desktop Fabrication. In: Ferdinand, JP., Petschow, U., Dickel, S. (eds) The Decentralized and Networked Future of Value Creation.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-31686-4_5

Google Scholar

[10] Chadha, U., Abrol, A., Vora, N.P. et al. Performance evaluation of 3D printing technologies: a review, recent advances, current challenges, and future directions.

DOI: 10.1007/s40964-021-00257-4

Google Scholar

[11] Arefin, A. M. E., Khatri, N. R., Kulkarni, N., & Egan, P. F. (2021). Polymer 3D Printing Review: Materials, Process, and Design Strategies for Medical Applications.

DOI: 10.3390/polym13091499

Google Scholar

[12] Iftekar, S.F.; Aabid, A.; Amir, A.; Baig, M. Advancements and Limitations in 3D Printing Materials and Technologies: A Critical Review. Polymers 2023.

DOI: 10.3390/polym15112519

Google Scholar

[13] Cook, R. D., Malkus, D. S., Plesha, M. E., & Witt, R. J. (2002). Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis.

Google Scholar

[14] Manero, A.; Sparkman, J.; Dombrowski, M.; Smith, P.; Senthil, P.; Smith, S.; Rivera, V.; Chi, A. Evolving 3D-Printing Strategies for Structural and Cosmetic Components in Upper Limb Prosthesis.

DOI: 10.3390/prosthesis5010013

Google Scholar

[15] Kristiawan, R. B., Imaduddin, F., Ariawan, D., Ubaidillah, & Arifin, Z. (2021). A review of the fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing: Filament processing, materials, and printing parameters.

DOI: 10.1515/eng-2021-0063

Google Scholar

[16] https://omnexus.specialchem.com/selection-guide/thermoplastic-polyurethanes-tpu.

Google Scholar

[17] Xu, T., Shen, W., Lin, X., & Xie, Y. M. (2020). Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU) Material Affected by Various Processing Parameters.

DOI: 10.3390/polym12123010

Google Scholar

[18] https://www.creality.com/products/ender-5-pro-3d-printer.

Google Scholar

[19] Naba Kumar Kalita, Minna Hakkarainen, Integrating biodegradable polyesters in a circular economy, Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry Volume 40, 2023, 100751, ISSN 2452-2236.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2022.100751

Google Scholar

[20] Nishida, H. (2011). Development of materials and technologies for control of polymer recycling.

Google Scholar

[21] https://www.matweb.com/.

Google Scholar

[22] https://3dsolved.com/best-filament-to-3d-print-phone-cases/.

Google Scholar

[23] https://www.mufasaspecialties.biz/jual-thermoplastic-polyurethane/.

Google Scholar

[24] https://patents.google.com/patent/EP2271712B1/en.

Google Scholar

[25] https://reliancerubberindustries.com/materials/silicone/?utm_source.

Google Scholar

[26] https://www.angreen.com/news/density-of-thermoplastic-polyurethane-in-different-applications-in-cable.html?utm_source.

Google Scholar

[27] https://www.rubber-tools.com/silicone-rubber-density-lb-in3-guide-in-depth/?utm_source.

Google Scholar