[1]
Ambrogio, G., Denapoli, L., Filice, L., Gagliardi, F., Muzzupappa, M., 2005. Application of Incremental Forming process for high customised medical product manufacturing. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 162-163, 156–162.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.148
Google Scholar
[2]
Duflou, J.R., Lauwers, B., Verbert, J., Gelaude, F., Tunckol, Y., 2005. Medical application of single point incremental forming: Cranial plate manufacturing, in: Virtual Modelling and Rapid Manufacturing - Advanced Research in Virtual and Rapid Prototyping. p.161–166.
DOI: 10.1201/9781003759591-25
Google Scholar
[3]
Fiorentino, A., Marenda, G.P., Marzi, R., Ceretti, E., Kemmoku, D.T., Lopes Da Silva, J. V., 2012. "Rapid prototyping techniques for individualized medical prosthesis manufacturing." Innovative Developments in Virtual and Physical Prototyping - Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Advanced Research and Rapid Prototyping 1, p.589–594.
DOI: 10.1201/b11341-94
Google Scholar
[4]
Bagudanch, I., García-Romeu, M.L., Ferrer, I., Ciurana, J., 2018. "Customized cranial implant manufactured by incremental sheet forming using a biocompatible polymer." Rapid Prototyping Journal 24, p.120–129.
DOI: 10.1108/rpj-06-2016-0089
Google Scholar
[5]
Centeno, Gabriel, Morales-Palma, D., Gonzalez-Perez-Somarriba, B., Bagudanch, I., Egea-Guerrero, J.J., Gonzalez-Perez, L.M., García-Romeu, M.L., Vallellano, C., 2017. "A functional methodology on the manufacturing of customized polymeric cranial prostheses from CAT using SPIF." Rapid Prototyping Journal 23, p.771–780.
DOI: 10.1108/rpj-02-2016-0031
Google Scholar
[6]
Yang Z, Chen F, Gatea S, Ou H. Design of the novel hot incremental sheet forming experimental setup, characterization of formability behavior of polyether-etherketone (PEEK). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2020;106:5365–81. https://doi.org/.
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-05035-0
Google Scholar
[7]
Chen LF, Chen F, Gatea S, Ou H. In: PEEK based cranial reconstruction using thermal assisted incremental sheet forming. 236; 2021. p.997–1004. https://doi. org/.
DOI: 10.1177/09544054211045904
Google Scholar
[8]
A. Rosa-Sainz, M.L. García-Romeu, I. Ferrer, M.B. Silva, G. Centeno, On the effective peek application for customized cranio-maxillofacial prostheses: An experimental formability analysis, J. Manuf. Process. 86 (2023) 66–84.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.12.044
Google Scholar
[9]
A. Rosa-Sainz, I. Ferrer, M.L. Garcia-Romeu, G. Centeno, Characterization of plastic formability and failure mechanisms in FDM additively manufactured PETG and PCL sheets, Polym Test 134 (2024).
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4696435
Google Scholar
[10]
M.L. Garcia-Romeu, I. Ferrer, C. Pasotti, J. Coma, A. Rosa-Sainz, G. Centeno, Preliminary study on the use of 3D printed biodegradable polymeric sheet for the manufacturing of medical prostheses by SPIF, in: Procedia CIRP, Elsevier B.V., 2022: p.76–81.
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2022.06.016
Google Scholar
[11]
Hasan, A. & Akhtar, S.S. Hybrid Manufacturing: A Critical Review on the Integration of Metal Additive Manufacturing and Forming 2025, Arabian J. Science and Engng. 1-30.
Google Scholar
[12]
Hafenecker J, Bartels D, Kuball CM, Kreß M, Rothfelder R, Schmidt M, et al. Hybrid process chains combining metal additive manufacturing and forming – A review. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 2023;46:98–115.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2023.08.002
Google Scholar
[13]
Ge T., Li Y., Gao D., Yang C., Li F. Hybridizing additive manufacturing and sheet forming process to manufacture complex components with multi-features: A review. J Manuf Proc 2024;124:345–64.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.06.032
Google Scholar
[14]
Ambrogio G, Gagliardi F, Muzzupappa M, Filice L. Additive-incremental forming hybrid manufacturing technique to improve customised part performance. J Manuf Proc. 2019;37:386–91.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.12.008
Google Scholar
[15]
Rosa-Sainz A, Centeno G, Silva MB, Vallellano C. Experimental investigation of polycarbonate sheets deformed by SPIF: formability, micro-mechanisms of failure and temperature analysis. J Mater Res Technol 2023;25:7546–65.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.07.075
Google Scholar