Voltage-Induced Director Orientations in IPS-Liquid Crystal Cells with Different Electrode Structures

Article Preview

Abstract:

In-plane switching (IPS) liquid crystal displays (LCDs) with low operating voltages and high contrast ratios can be achieved by optimizing the electrode structure. The optimized electrode structure may produce a strong transverse electric field within the IPS liquid crystal (LC) cell, resulting in a smaller on-state voltage (Von). This work investigates the electro-optical properties of IPS-LC cells with different electrode configurations through simulation studies. Four configurations are proposed herein, including two flat-IPS and two wall-IPS LC cells with different geometric dimensions. The results reveal that reducing the geometric dimensions within similar structures leads to a lower Von and a higher contrast ratio due to the stronger electric field generated by narrower electrodes and smaller gaps. The wall-IPS configuration exhibits a lower Von and a higher contrast ratio compared to the flat-IPS configuration because the stronger electric field can more effectively reorient the LC molecules in the wall-IPS LC cell. The voltage-induced director orientations in both the flat-IPS and wall-IPS configurations confirm that the transverse electric field in the wall electrodes is stronger than that in the flat electrodes at equivalent voltages. Consequently, the LC molecules experience significant reorientation, which results in a reduced Von and an increased contrast ratio in the wall-IPS LC cells. The wall IPS-LC cell with a low voltage and high contrast ratio has the potential for the development of high-performance advanced LC devices.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

33-38

Citation:

Online since:

June 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H.W. Chen, J. H. Lee, B. Y. Lin, S. Chen, and S. T. Wu: Light: Sci. Appl. Vol 7, 17168 (2018).

Google Scholar

[2] K. Yin, E. L. Hsiang, J. Zou, Y. Li, Z. Yang, Q. Yang, P. C. Lai, C. L. Lin, and S. T. Wu: Light: Sci. Appl. Vol 11, 161 (2022).

Google Scholar

[3] S. Halder, Y. Shin, Y. Peng, L. Wang, L. Duan, P. D. Schmalenberg, G. Qin, Y. Gao, E. M. Dede, D. K. Yang, and S. P. Rodrigues: Nat. Commun. Vol 15, 9760 (2024).

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54109-0

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Li, Z. Guo, Y. M. Zeng, L. Yu, L. L. Tian, and F. Chu: Displays Vol 80, 102562 (2023).

Google Scholar

[5] R. Suryantari, Y. H. Shih, H. Y. Chen, C. S. Wu, and C. Y. Huang: Opt. Lett. Vol 48, 77-80 (2023).

Google Scholar

[6] J. Liu, L. Li, Y. Um, H. Xu, and C. C. Hsie: Displays Vol 77, 102407 (2023).

Google Scholar

[7] Y. C. Chiang, R. Suryantari, S. H. Lin, H. M. Silalahi, W. F. Chiang, Y. H. Shih, W. K. Choi, and C. Y. Huang: Opt. Lett. Vol 48(24), 6412-6415 (2023).

DOI: 10.1364/ol.505221

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Guo, Y. Wang, C. Zhang, Q. Mu, X. Li, H. Dou, F. Chu, H. Ma, H. Zhang, and Y. Sun: Liq. Cryst. Vol 46(4), 523-534 (2019).

Google Scholar

[9] H. Fan, J. Cui, and Q. H. Wang: Liq. Cryst. Vol 42(4), 481-485 (2015).

Google Scholar

[10] H. Chen, Y. F. Lan, C. Y. Tsai, and S. T. Wu: Liq. Cryst. Vol 44(7), 1124-1130 (2017).

Google Scholar

[11] F. Zhou, Q. H. Wang, D. Wu, and C. Jianpeng: Chin. Opt. Lett. Vol 10, 022301 (2012).

Google Scholar

[12] L. L. Tian, F. Chu, H. Dou, X. Zhou, and Q. H. Wang: Liq. Cryst. Vol 45(8), 1259-1263 (2018).

Google Scholar