FEM Analysis of a Crack in a Bimaterial Plate Based on the Crack Tip Stress Method

Hironobu Nisitani; T. Teranishi

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.243-244.387

Paper Titles

Analysis of Concrete Fracture Evolution by Simulation and Acoustic Emission
p.363

Development and Application of the Strain Energy Density Criterion to Three-Dimensional I-II Mixed-Mode Fracture
p.369

Stress Intensity Factors for Interaction between Interface Crack and Internal Crack and for Kinked Interface Crack in Bonded Semi-Infinite Planes
p.375

Dynamic Ductile Fracture Toughness Test and Numerical Simulation for Ultra-High Pressure Gas Pipelines
p.381

FEM Analysis of a Crack in a Bimaterial Plate Based on the Crack Tip Stress Method
p.387

Fracture Mechanics Parameters Governing Delaminated Interfaces in IC Packages Subjected to Unsteady Thermal Stress
p.393

Experimental Observation of Final Void Volume Fraction at Fracture in Constrained Metal Matrix Composites
p.399

The Void Size Effect in Metallic Materials
p.405

Damage Identification Based Simulations for a Class of Nonlinear Structures
p.411

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vols. 243-244FEM Analysis of a Crack in a Bimaterial Plate...

FEM Analysis of a Crack in a Bimaterial Plate Based on the Crack Tip Stress Method

Abstract:

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Progress in Experimental and Computational Mechanics in Engineering

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 243-244)

Pages:

387-392

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.243-244.387

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2003

Authors:

Hironobu Nisitani, T. Teranishi

Keywords:

Bimaterials, Body Force Method, Finite Element Model (FEM), Stress Intensity Factor (SIF)

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

Google Scholar

9 Fig. 9 Relation between F1,appr and a/w a/w 0 F1,appr h/w=0.5

2 0.3 0.4 0.5

[1] 0

[1] 1

[1] 2

[1] 3

[1] 0

05 Plane stress, L/2w=1, ǌ=G2/G1=0.1, ǵ1=ǵ2=0.3

Google Scholar

25 Fig. 10 Relation between F2,appr and a/w a/w 0 F2,appr

Google Scholar

2 0.3 0.4 0.5

Google Scholar

[1] 0

Google Scholar

1 h/w=0.05 Plane stress, L/2w=1, ǌ=G2/G1=0.1, ǵ1=ǵ2=0.3

Google Scholar

9 Fig. 9 Relation between F1,appr and a/w a/w 0 F1,appr h/w=0.5

Google Scholar

2 0.3 0.4 0.5

Google Scholar

9 Fig. 9 Relation between F1,appr and a/w a/w 0 F1,appr h/w=0.5

2 0.3 0.4 0.5

[1] 0

[1] 1

[1] 2

[1] 3

[1] 0

05 Plane stress, L/2w=1, ǌ=G2/G1=0.1, ǵ1=ǵ2=0.3

Google Scholar

25 Fig. 10 Relation between F2,appr and a/w a/w 0

[1] 0

[1] 1

[1] 2

[1] 3

[1] 0

05 Plane stress, L/2w=1, ǌ=G2/G1=0.1, ǵ1=ǵ2=0.3

Google Scholar

25 Fig. 10 Relation between F2,appr and a/w a/w 0 F2,appr

Google Scholar

2 0.3 0.4 0.5

Google Scholar

[1] 0

Google Scholar

1 h/w=0.05 Plane stress, L/2w=1, ǌ=G2/G1=0.1, ǵ1=ǵ2=0.3

Google Scholar